Abstract
The ability of a high resolution (T106) version of the ECHAM3 general circulation model to simulate regional scale surface radiative fluxes has been assessed using observations from a new compilation of worldwide instrumentally-measured surface fluxes (Global Energy Balance Archive, GEBA). The focus is on the European region where the highest density of observations is found, and their use for the validation of global and regional climate models is demonstrated. The available data allow a separate assessment of the simulated fluxes of surface shortwave, longwave, and net radiation for this region. In summer, the incoming shortwave radiation calculated by the ECHAM3/T106 model is overestimated by 45 W m−2 over most of Europe, which implies a largely unrealistic forcing on the model surface scheme and excessive surface temperatures. In winter, too little incoming shortwave radiation reaches the model surface. Similar tendencies are found over large areas of the mid-latitudes. These biases are consistent with deficiencies in the simulation of cloud amount, relative humidity and clear sky radiative transfer. The incoming longwave radiation is underestimated at the European GEBA stations predominantly in summer. This largely compensates for the excessive shortwave flux, leading to annual mean net radiation values over Europe close to observations due to error cancellation, a feature already noted in the simulated global mean values in an earlier study. Furthermore, the annual cycle of the simulated surface net radiation is strongly affected by the deficiencies in the simulated incoming shortwave radiation. The high horizontal resolution of the GCM allows an assessment of orographically induced flux gradients based on observations from the European Alps. Although the model-calculated and observed flux fields substantially differ in their absolute values, several aspects of their gradients are realistically captured. The deficiencies identified in the model fields are generally consistent at most stations, indicating a high degree of representativeness of the measurements for their larger scale setting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barry RG (1992) Mountain weather and climate, 2nd ed. Routledge, London, pp 206–213
Beljaars ACM, Viterbo P (1994) The sensitivity of winter evaporation to the formulation of aerodynamic resistance in the ECMWF model. Boundary Layer Meteorol 71:135–150
Betts AK, Ball JH, Beljaars ACM (1993) Comparison between the land surface response of the ECMWF model and the FIFE-1987 data. Q J R Meteorol Soc 119:975–1001
Budyko MI (1974) Climate and life. Academic Press, New York, pp 140–192
Dümenil L, Todini E (1992) A rainfall runoff scheme for use in the Hamburg climate model. In: O'Kane JP (ed) Advances in numerical hydrology. A tribute to James Dooge. European Geophysical Society Series on Hydrological Sciences 1. Elsevier Science, pp 129–157
Fouquart Y, Bonnel B, Ramaswamy V (1991) Intercomparing shortwave radiation codes for climate studies. J Geophys Res 96D: 8929–8953
Garratt JR (1994) incoming shortwave fluxes at the surface — a comparison of GCM results with observations. J Clim 7:72–80
Garratt JR, Krummel PB, Kowalczyk EA (1993) The surface energy balance at local and regional scales — a comparison of general circulation model results with observations. J Clim 6:1090–1109
Gates WL (1992) AMIP: The atmospheric model intercomparison project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 73:1962–1970
Geleyn JF, Preuss HJ (1983) A new data set of satellite-derived surface albedo values for operational use at ECMWF. Arch Meteor Geophys Bioclim Ser A 32:353–359
Giorgetta M, Wild M (1995) the water vapour continuum and its representation in ECHAM4. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Rep 162
Giorgi F, Marinucci MR, Visconti G (1990) Use of a limited area model nested in a general circulation model for regional climate simulation over Europe. J Geophys Res 95D:18413–18431
Hense A, Kerschgens M, Raschke E (1982) An economical method for computing radiative transfer in circulation models. Q J R Meteorol See 108:231–252
Kerschgens MU, Pilz E, Raschke E (1978) A modified two stream approximation for computations of the solar radiation budget in a cloudy atmosphere. Tellus 30:429–435
Kiehl JT, Williamson DL (1991) Dependence of cloud amount on horizontal resolution in the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model. J Geophys Res 96D: 10 955–10 980
Le Roux X, Polcher J, Dedieu G, Menaut JC, Monteny BA (1994) Radiation exchanges above West African moist savannas: seasonal patterns and comparison with a GCM simulation. J Geophys Res 99D: 25 857–25 868
Luethi D, Cress C, Davies HC, Frei C, Schaer C (1995) Interannual variability and regional climate simulation. Theor Appl Climatol (in press)
Marinucci MR, Giorgi F, Beniston M, Wild M, Tschuck P, Ohmura A, Bernasconi A (1995) High resolution simulations of January and July climate over the western Alpine region with a nested regional modeling system. Theor Appl Climatol (in press)
Müller H (1984) Review paper on the radiation budget in the Alps. J Climatol 5:445–462
Müller G, Ohmura A (1993) Radiation annual report ETH 2 1990, 1991. Ztircher Geogr Schr 52, Zurich
Ohmura A, Schroff K (1983) Physical characteristics of the Davos-type pyrradiometer for short- and long-wave radiation. Arch Meteorol Bio Ser B 33:57–76
Ohmura A, Gilgen H (1991) Global Energy Balance Archive GEBA. Report 2: the GEBA database: interactive applications, retrieving data. Zürcher Geogr Schr 44, Zürich
Ohmura A, Gilgen H (1993) Re-evaluation of the global energy balance. Geophys Monogr 75, IUGG Vol 15:93–110
Ohmura A, Gilgen H, Wild M (1989) Global EnergyBalance Archive GEBA. Report 1: introduction. Zürcher Geograf Schr 34, Zürich
Ohmura A, Müller G, Schroff K, Konzelmann T (1990) Radiation annual report ETH 1 1987–1989. Zürcher Geograf Schr 39, Zürich
Phillips TJ, Corsetti LC, Grotch SL (1995) The impact of horizontal resolution on moist processes in the ECMWF model. Clim Dyn 11:85–102
Roeckner E, Rieland M, Keup E (1991) Modelling of cloud and radiation in the ECHAM model: ECMWF/WCRP Workshop on “clouds, radiative transfer and the hydrological cycle”. ECMWF, Reading, pp 199–222
Roeckner E, Arpe K, Bengtsson L, Brinkop S, Dümenil L, Esch M, Kirk E, Lunkeit F, Ponater M, Rockel B, Sausen R, Schlese U, Schubert S, Windelband M (1992) Simulation of the present day climate with the ECHAM model: impact of model physics and resolution. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Rep 93
Schüepp M (1963) Klimatologie der Schweiz Heft 4/H: Bewölkung und Nebel. Swiss Meteorological Office, Zürich
Shettle EP, Fenn R (1976) Models of the atmospheric aerosols and their optical properties. AGARD Conf Proc 183, AGARD-CP-183
Shuttleworth WJ, Dickinson RE (1989) Comments on “modelling tropical deforestation: a study of GCM land-surface parameterizations” by R. E. Dickinson and A. Henderson-Sellers. Q J R Meteorol Soc 115:1177–1179
Stephens GL (1978) Radiation profiles in extended water clouds: 2. parameterization schemes. J Atmos Sci 35:2123–2132
Urfer C, Gensler G, Ambrosetti F, Zenone E (1979) Klimatologie der Schweiz Band 2: Regionale Klimabeschreibungen, 2. Teil. Swiss Meteorological Office, Zürich
Warren SG, Hahn CJ, London J, Chervin RM, Jenne RL (1986) Global distribution of total cloud cover and cloud type amounts over land. DOE/ER/60085-Hl, NCAR/TN273 + STR
Wild M, Ohmura A, Gilgen H, Roeckner E (1995) Validation of GCM simulated radiative fluxes using surface observations. J Clim 8:1309–1324
Wilson CA, Mitchell JFB (1987) Simulated climate and C02-induced climate change over western Europe. Clim Change 10:11–42
Zdunkowski WG, Welch RM, Korb G (1980) An investigation of the structure of typical two stream methods for the calculation of solar fluxes and heating rates in clouds. Beitr Phys Atmos 53:147–166
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wild, M., Ohmura, A., Gilgen, H. et al. Regional climate simulation with a high resolution GCM: surface radiative fluxes. Climate Dynamics 11, 469–486 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207196
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207196