Skip to main content
Log in

Coral transplantation as an aid to reef rehabilitation: evaluation of a case study in the Maldive Islands

  • Reports
  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As part of a study of reef rehabilitation, whole coral colonies (primarily Acropora, Pocillopora, Porites, Favia and Favites) were transplanted and cemented in place onto three approximately 20 m2 areas of Armorflex concrete mats on a 0.8–1.5 m deep reef-flat in the Maldives which had been severely degraded by coral mining. Growth, in situ mortality, and losses from mats due to wave action of a total of 530 transplants were monitored over 28 months. Natural recruitment of corals to both the transplanted Armorflex areas and concrete mats without transplants was also studied. Overall survivorship of corals 28 months after transplantation was 51%. Most losses of transplants due to wave action occurred during the first 7 months when 25% were lost, with only a further 5% of colonies being lost subsequently. Within 16 months most colonies had accreted naturally to the concrete mats. Thirty-two percent of transplants which remained attached died with Acropora hyacinthus and Pocillopora verrucosa having the highest mortality rates (approx. 50% mortality over two years) and Porites lobata and P. lutea the lowest (2.8 and 8.1% mortality respectively over two years). Growth rates were very variable with a quarter to a third of transplants showing negative growth during each inter-survey period. Acropora hyacinthus, A. cytherea and A. divaricata transplants had the highest growth rates (colony mean linear radial extension 4.15–5.81 cm y−1), followed by Pocillopora verrucosa (mean 2.51 cm y−1). Faviids and poritids had lowest growth rates. Favia and Favites showed the poorest response to transplantation whilst Acropora divaricata, which combined a high growth rate with relatively low mortality, appeared particularly amenable to transplantation. Natural recruitment did not differ significantly between concrete mats with and without transplanted corals. ‘Visible’ recruits were first recorded 10 months after emplacement of the mats and were predominantly Acropora and Pocillopora. On near vertical surfaces their density was almost 18 m−2. Recruits grew fast producing many 20–30 cm diameter colonies on the mats within 3.5 years. Growth and survival of transplants are compared with results of transplantation studies in other locations. We conclude: (1) species transplanted should be selected with care as certain species are significantly more amenable than others to transplantation, (2) the choice of whether fragments or whole colonies are transplanted may profoundly influence survival, (3) considerable loss of transplants is likely from higher energy sites whatever method of attachment, (4) transplantation should, in general, be undertaken only if recovery following natural recruitment is unlikely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcala AC, Gomez ED (1979) Recolonization and growth of hermatypic corals in dynamite-blasted coral reefs in the Central Visayas, Philippines. Proc Int Symp Mar Biogeogr Evol S Hemisphere 2:645–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcala AC, Gomez ED, Alcala LC (1982) Survival and growth of coral transplants in Central Philippines. Kalikasan, Philipp J Biol 11:136–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Auberson B (1982) Coral transplantation: an approach to the reestablishment of damaged reefs. Kalikasan, Philipp J Biol 11: 158–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock RC (1985) Growth and mortality of juvenile corals (Goniastrea, Platygyra and Acropora): the first year. Proc 5th Int Coral Reef Symp 4:355–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkeland C, Randall RH, Grim G (1979) Three methods of coral transplantation for the purpose of reestablishing a coral community in the thermal effluent area of the Tanguisson Power Plant. Univ Guam Mar Lab Tech Rep 60

  • Bouchon C, Jaubert J, Bouchon-Navaro Y (1981) Evolution of a semi-artificial reef built by transplanting coral heads. Tethys 10:173–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown BE, Dunne RP (1988) The environmental impact of coral mining on coral reefs in the Maldives, Environ Conser 15(2): 159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown BE, Howard LS (1985) Assessing the effects of stress on reef corals. Adv Mar Biol 22:1–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark S, Edwards AJ (1993) Coral transplantation: an application to rehabilitate reef-flat areas degraded by coral mining in the Maldives. Proc 7th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:636

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark S, Edwards AJ (1994) The use of artificial reef structures to rehabilitate reef flats degraded by coral mining in the Maldives. Bull Mar Sci 55:726–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis C (1985) Investigating reef recovery following a freighter grounding in the Key Largo National Marine Science Sanctuary, (Florida Keys, USA). Proc 5th Int Coral Reef Congr 6:471–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson-Shepherd AR, Warwick RM, Clarke KR, Brown BE (1992) An analysis of fish community responses to coral mining in the Maldives. Environ Biol Fishes 33:367–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AJ, Clark S (1992) Rehabilitation of coral reef flats using pre-cast concrete. Concrete 26 (1):16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AJ, Clark S (1993) Re-establishment of reef fish populations on a reef flat degraded by coral quarrying in the Maldives. Proc 7th Int Coral Reef Symp 1:593–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittings SR, Bright TJ, Choi A, Barnett RR (1988) The recovery process in a mechanically damaged coral reef community: recruitment and growth. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:225–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg RW (1995) Coral reefs in an urban embayment in Hawaii: a complex case history controlled by both natural and anthropogenic stress. Coral Reefs 14:253–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzman HM (1991) Restoration of coral reefs in Pacific Costa Rica. Conserv Biol 5:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harriott VJ, Fisk DA (1988a) Coral transplantation as a reef management option. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:375–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriott VJ, Fisk DA (1988b) Accelerated regeneration of hard corals: a manual for coral reef users and managers. GBRMPA Techn Memor 16

  • Hatcher BG, Johannes RE, Robertson AI (1989) Review of research relevant to the conservation of shallow tropical marine ecosystems. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 27:337–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Highsmith RC (1982) Reproduction by fragmentation in corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7:207–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JH, Diaz R (1988) Damage survey and restoration of M/V Wellwood grounding site, Molasses Reef, Key Largo National Marine Sanctuary. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:231–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Maragos JE (1974) Coral transplantation: a method to create, preserve and manage coral reefs. Univ Hawaii Sea Grant Prog AR-74-03

  • Maragos JE, Evans C, Holthus P (1985) Reef corals in Kaneohe Bay six years before and after termination of sewage discharges. Proc 5th Int Coral Reef Congr 4:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller SL, McFall GB, Hulbert AW (1993) Guidelines and recommendations for coral reef restoration in the Florida Keys National marine Sanctuary. National Undersea Research Center, University of North Carolina at Wilmington

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman H, Chuan CS (1994) Transplanting a coral reef: a Singapore community project. Coast Manag Trop Asia 3:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson RG (1981) Recovery and recolonization of coral reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 4:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucer-Rosario GP, Randall RH (1987) Preservation of rare coral species by transplantation: an examination of their recruitment and growth. Bull Mar Sci 41:585–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvat B (ed) (1987) Human impacts on coral reefs: facts and recommendations. Antenne Museum, École Pratique des Hautes Études, French Polynesia

  • Shinn EA (1976) Coral reef recovery in Florida and the Persian Gulf. Environ Geol 1:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace CC (1983) Visible and invisible coral recruitment. In: Baker JT, Carter RM, Sammarco PW, Stark KP (eds) Proc Inaug Great Barrier Reef Conf, James Cook University Press, Townsville, pp 259–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DM, Wolanski E, Andrews JC (1984) Transport mechanisms and the potential movement of planktonic larvae in the central region of the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 3: 229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis BL, Oliver JK (1988) Inter-reef dispersal of coral larvae following the annual mass spawning on the Great Barrier Reef. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:853–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodley JD (1992) The incidence of hurricanes on the north coast of Jamaica since 1870: are classic reef descriptions atypical? Hydrobiologia 247:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodley JD, Clark JR (1989) Rehabilitation of degraded coral reefs. Coastal Zone '89 Proc 6th Symp Coastal Ocean Manag 4: 3059–3075

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff JL (1984) Sponge-mediated coral reef growth and rejuvenation. Coral Reefs 3:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap HT, Gomez ED (1984) Growth of Acropora pulchra II. Responses of natural and transplanted colonies to temperature and day length. Mar Biol 81:209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap HT, Gomez ED (1985) Growth of Acropora pulchra III. Preliminary observations on the effects of transplantation and sediment on the growth and survival of transplants. Mar Biol 87:203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap HT, Licuanan WY, Gomez ED (1990) Studies on coral recovery and coral transplantation in the norther Philippines: aspects relevant to management and conservation. In: Yap HT (ed) Proc 1st ASEAMS Symp Southeast Asian Marine Science and Environmental Protection. UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies 116, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, pp 117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Yap HT, Aliño PM, Gomez ED (1992) Trends in growth and mortality of three coral species (Anthozoa: Scleractinia), including effects of transplantation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 83:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, S., Edwards, A.J. Coral transplantation as an aid to reef rehabilitation: evaluation of a case study in the Maldive Islands. Coral Reefs 14, 201–213 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334342

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00334342

Keywords

Navigation