Skip to main content
Log in

Salt tolerant sugarbeet progeny from tissue cultures challenged with multiple salts

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lines of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) tolerant of multiple salts was accomplished by an in vitro multiple salt challenge. Petioles were placed on RV medium amended with 5 different salts along with Murashige and Skoog base salts for one month. Surviving shoots were cultured on RV medium to obtain petioles for subsequent challenges. During the first, second and third challenges, organogenically regenerated shoots developed from 5%, 46%, and 80% of the petioles, respectively. After the third multiple salt challenge, tolerant shoots were rooted and transplanted in soil. Salt was added to this soil at 1.0% by weight and plants were observed for 2 months. The ten most salt tolerant plants were vernalized to obtain seed. The R1 seed and controls were planted in soil containing 0%, 0.61% or 0.77% multiple salts per dry soil weight. Emergence of R1 seedlings was significantly greater than the controls under salt stress. Multiple salt tolerant R1 plants were maintained in salt amended soil to the 8–10 leaf stage and appeared as healthy and vigorous as the control growing in salt free soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beatty KD, Ehlig CF (1973) Amer Soc Sugarbeet Tech Vol 17, No 4:295–299

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chandler SF, Mandal BB, Thorpe TA (1986) J Plant Physiol 125:105–117

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chandler SF, Thorpe TA (1987) Plant Physiol 84: 106–111

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chandler SF, Vasil IK (1984) Plant Sci Lett 37: 157–164

    Google Scholar 

  5. Detrez C, Tetu T, Sangwan RS (1988) J of Exp Botany 39:917–926

    Google Scholar 

  6. Freytag AH, Anand, SC, Rao Arelli AP, Owens LD (1988) Plant Cell Reports 7:30–34

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Exp Cell Res 50:151–158

    Google Scholar 

  8. McCoy TJ (1987) Plant Cell Reports 6:31–34

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nabors MW, Dykes TA (1985) In: Biotechnology in international agricultural research. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, pp 121–138

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nabors MW, Gibb SE, Bernstein CS, Meis ME (1980) Z Pflanzenphysiol 97:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nabors MW, Kroskey CS, McHugh DM (1982) Z Pflanzenphysiol 105:341–349

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ramagopal S (1986) Plant Cell Reports 5:430–434

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pua EC, Thorpe TA (1986) J Plant Physiol 123: 241–248

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stavarek SJ, Rains DW (1984) In: Staples RC, Toenniessen GH (ed) Salinity tolerance in plants, Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 321–324

    Google Scholar 

  16. Toenniessen GH (1984) In: Staples RC, Toenniessen GH (ed) Salinity tolerance in plants: Strategies for crop improvement. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 399–413

    Google Scholar 

  17. Warne TR, Hickok LG (1987) Plant Science 52: 49–55

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G.C. Phillips

Contribution from Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. 10948. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA Mention of trade names does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by University of Missouri of Holly Sugar Corporation and does not imply their approval to the exclusion of other products.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freytag, A.H., Wrather, J.A. & Erichsen, A.W. Salt tolerant sugarbeet progeny from tissue cultures challenged with multiple salts. Plant Cell Reports 8, 647–650 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269984

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269984

Keywords

Navigation