Skip to main content
Log in

The use of electrophoretic karyotypes in the classification of yeasts: Kluyveromyces marxianus and K. lactis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Current Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The relationship between varieties “marxianus” and “lactis” of Kluyveromyces marxianus was investigated. Strains of these varieties readily form hybrids, but their classification in one species has recently been contested. Enzyme patterns and the GC contents of their DNAs differed significantly. Moreover, DNA-DNA reassociation was less than 15%. Since the generally accepted definition of a species is based on gene exchange, we used two approaches for directly detecting genetic recombination in crosses between representatives of both species. First, multiple marked strains were crossed, and the offspring from the resulting hybrids analyzed. Secondly, the fate of individual chromosomes in identical crosses was followed by comparing the karyotypes of the parent strains, the hybrids formed between them, and the descendants of these hybrids. Karyotypes were obtained by orthogonal-field-altemation gel electrophoresis (OFAGE). Gene exchange was not detected with either method. We therefore concluded that the formation of hybrids, even when they produced viable offspring, was not sufficient to include var. “lactis” and var. “marxianus” in one species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bicknell JN, Douglas HC (1970) J Bacteriol 101:505–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeke JD, LaCroute F, Fink GR (1984) Mol Gen Genet 197:345–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Carle F, Olson MV (1984) Nucleic Acids Res 12:5647–5664

    Google Scholar 

  • Carle F, Olson MV (1985) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:3756–3760

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell M, Kock JFL, Lategan PM, Botes PJ, Britz TJ (1985) FEMS Microbiol Lett 30:373–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Hollenberg CP (1982) Curr Genet 6:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T (1976) In: Ayala FJ (ed) Molecular evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T, Ayala FJ, Stebbins GL, Valentine (1977) Evolution. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuson GB, Presley HL, Phaff HJ (1987) Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:371–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannsen E (1980) Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J Microbiol Serol 46:177–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannsen E, van der Walt JP (1978) Arch Microbiol 118:45–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonge P de, Jongh FCM de, Meijers R, Steensma HY, Scheffers WA (1986) Yeast 2:193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzman CP, Smiley MJ, Johnson CJ (1980) Int J Syst Bacteriol 30:503–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachance M-A, Phaff HJ (1979) Int J Syst Bacteriol 29:70–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini AV, Martini A (1987) Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:380–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer SA, Phaff HJ (1970) Taxonomic significance of DNA base composition in yeast. In: Ahearn DG (ed) Recent trends in yeast research, vol 1. Spectrum (Georgia State University), Atlanta, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakase T, Komagata K (1971) J Gen Appl Microbiol 17:227–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Poncet S, Fiol J-B (1972) Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J Microbiol Serol 38:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Price CW, Fuson GB, Phaff HJ (1978) Microbiol Rev 42:161–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouwenhorst RJ, Visser LE, Baan AA van der, Scheffers WA, Dijken JP van (1988) Appl Environ Microbiol 54:1131–1137

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman F, Fink GR, Hicks JB (1981) Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidenberg DG, Lachance M-A (1986) Int J Syst Bacteriol 36:94–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt JP van der (1956) Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J Microbiol Serol 22:321–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt JP van der (1970) Kluyveromyces van der Walt emend. van der Walt. In: Lodder J (ed) The yeasts: a taxonomic study. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 316–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt JP van der, Johannsen E (1984) Kluyveromyces van der Walt emend. van der Walt. In: Kreger-van Rij (ed) The yeasts: a taxonomic study. Elsevier, Amsterdam New York, pp 316–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada Y, Aizawa K, Matsumoto A, Nakagawa Y, Banno J (1987) J Gen Appl Microbiol 33:363–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarrow D (1975) In: Centraal Bureau voor Schimmelcultures Baam en Delft Progress Report 1974. Verhandelingen der Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeling Natuurkunde Tweede Reeks 66:57–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld BJM (1986) J Microbiol Methods 4:287–291

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steensma, H.Y., de Jongh, F.C.M. & Linnekamp, M. The use of electrophoretic karyotypes in the classification of yeasts: Kluyveromyces marxianus and K. lactis . Curr Genet 14, 311–317 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419987

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419987

Key words

Navigation