Abstract
Field studies of the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta revealed a primarily monogamous mating system. However polygyny, polyandry and polygynandry were superimposed upon the primary system, with 9% of the marked males and 11% of the marked females in a field population mating more than once. In the laboratory males commonly mated multiply with fertile offspring resulting, while females were less likely than males to mate multiply. Monogamy under field conditions was enforced by two factors: (1) high travel costs to males, and (2) a significant decline in female receptivity after the first mating. Heavy males were more likely to be accepted by females both in the field, and in female choice experiments conducted in the laboratory. Finally, male weight determined the outcome of male-male agonistic interactions over females. One possible explanation for female choice in this system which lacks male parental investment is that females may be using male size as an indicator of future success of their offspring.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcock J, Buchmann SL (1985) The significance of post-insemination display by male Centris pallida (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). Z Tierpsychol 68:231–243
Austad SN (1984) Evolution of sperm priority patterns in spiders. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 223–249
Austad SN (1989) Life extension by dietary restriction in the bowl and doily spider, Frontinella pyramitela. Exp Gerontol 24:83–92
Christenson T, Cohn J (1988) Male advantage for egg fertilization in the golden orb-weaving spider (Nephila clavipes). J Comp Psych 102:312–318
Cooper WE, Vitt LJ (1993) Female mate choice of large male broadheaded skinks. Anim Behav 45:683–693
Crews D (1975) Psychobiology of reptilian reproduction. Science 189:1059–1065
Curtsinger JW (1991) Sperm competition and the evolution of multiple mating. Am Nat 138:93–102
Davies NB (1991) Mating systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral Ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 253–294
Davies NB, Lundberg A (1984) Food distribution and a variable mating system in the dunnock, Prunella modularis. J Anim Ecol 53:895–912
Dewsbury DA (1984) Sperm competition in muroid rodents. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 547–571
Dickinson JL (1992) Scramble competition polygyny in the milkweed leaf beetle: combat, mobility and the importance of being there. Behav Ecol 3:32–41
Dickinson JL. Rutowski RL (1989) The function of the mating plug in the chalcedon checkerspot butterfly. Anim Behav 38:154–162
Downes JA (1978) Feeding and mating in the insectivorous Ceratopogoninae (Diptera) Mem Entomol Soc Can 104:1–62
Dunn PO, Hannon SJ (1991) Intraspecific competition and the maintenance of monogamy in tree swallows. Behav Ecol 2: 258–266
Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection. and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223
Fincke OM (1986) Underwater oviposition in a damselfly (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) favors male vigilance, and multiple mating by females. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:405–412
Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford
Gering RL (1953) Structure and function of genitalia in some American agelenid spiders. Smithsonian Misc Coll 121:1–84
Gwynne DT (1986) Courtship feeding in katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): Investment in offspring or in obtaining fertilizations? Am Nat 128:342–352
Halliday T, Arnold SJ (1987) Multiple mating by females: a perspective from quantitative genetics. Anim Behav 35:939–941
Howard RD (1978) The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catcsbiana. Evolution 32:850–871
Jackson RR (1980) The mating strategy of Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae: Salticidae) 11. Sperm competition and the function of copulation. J Arachnol 8:217–240
Joy J, Crews D (1988) Male mating success in red-sided garter snakes: size is not important. Anim Behav 36: 1839–1841
Kessel EL (1955) The mating activities of balloon flies. Syst Zoo 4:997–1004
Kirkpatrick M (1982) Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1–12
Kodric-Brown A, Brown JH (1984) Truth in advertising: the kinds of traits favored by sexual selection. Am Nat 124:309–323
Laidlaw HH (1944) Artificial insemination of the queen bee (Apis mellifera L.): morphological basis and results. J Morphol 74: 429–465
Madsen T, Shine R, Loman J, Hakansson T (1992) Why do female adders copulate so frequently? Nature 355:440–441
Markow TA, Ankney PF (1984) Drosophila males contribute to oogenesis in a multiple mating species. Science 224:302–303
Marks RW, Seager RD, Barr LG (1988) Local ecology and multiple mating in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Am Nat 131 (6):918–923
Mathis A (1991) Large male advantage for access to females: evidence of male-male competition and female discrimination in a territorial salamander. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29: 133–138
Maynard Smith J, Riechert SE (1984) A conflicting tendency model of spider agonistic behavior: hybrid-pure line comparisons. Anim Behav 32: 564–578
McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1983) Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, London
Møller A (1990) Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Anim Behav 40:1185–1187
Nalepa C, Jones S (1991) Evolution of monogamy in termites. Biol Rev 66:83–97
Nicoletto PF (1991) The relationship between male ornamentation and swimming performance in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:365–370
Oberhauser K (1989) Effects of spermatophores on male and female monarch butterfly reproductive success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:237–246
Partridge L, Hoffmann A, Jones JS (1987) Male size and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura under field conditions. Anim Behav 35:468–476
Ridley M (1988) Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol Rev 63:509–549
Riechert SE (1974) The pattern of local web distribution in a desert spider: mechanisms and seasonal variation. J Anim Ecol 43: 733–746
Riechert SE (1978a) Energy-based territoriality in populations of the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta (Gertsch). Symp Zool Soc Lond 42:211–222
Riechert SE (1978b) Games spiders play: behavioral variability in territorial disputes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:135–162
Riechert SE (1979) Games spiders play 11. Resource assessment strategies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:121–128
Riechert SE (1981) The consequences of being territorial: spiders, a case study. Am Nat 117:871–892
Riechert SE (1985) Decision problems in multiple goal contexts: spider habitat selection. Z Tierpsychol 70:53–69
Riechert SE, Hays JM (1987) Nutritional ecology of spiders. In: Slansky F, Rodriguez JG (eds) Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders and related invertebrates. Wiley, New York, pp 645–672
Riechert SE, Maynard Smith J (1989) Genetic analyses of two behavioural traits linked to individual fitness in the desert spider, Agelenopsis aperta. Anim Behav 37:624–637
Riechert SE, Singer F (in press) Investigation of potential male mate choice in a monogamous spider. Anim Behav
Riechert SE, Tracy CR (1975) Thermal balance and prey availability: bases for a model relating web-site characteristics to spider reproductive success. Ecology 56:265–285
Riechert SE, Reeder WG, Allen T (1973) Patterns of spider distribution [Agelenopsis aperta (Gertsch)] in desert grassland and recent lava bed habitats, south-central New Mexico. J Anim Ecol 42:19–35
Robinson MH, Robinson B (1980) Comparative studies on the courtship and mating behavior of tropical araneid spiders. Pac Insects Monogr 36:1–218
Sandell M, Liberg O (1992) Roamers and stayers: a model on male mating tactics and mating systems. Am Nat 139:177–189
Singer F, Riechert SE (1994) Tests for sex differences in fitnesslinked traits in the spider, Agelenopsis apertu. J Insect Behav 7:517–532
Sullivan BK (1989) Mating system variation in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousii). Ethology 83:60–68
Suter RB, Parkhill VS (1990) Fitness consequences of prolonged copulation in the bowl and doily spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:369–373
Thornhill R (1976) Sexual selection and paternal investment in insects. Am Nat 110:153–163
Thornhill R (1992) Female preference for the pheromone of males with low fluctuating asymmetry in the Japanese scorpionfly (Panorpa japonica: Mecoptera). Behav Ecol 3:277–283
Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Watson PJ (1991a) Multiple paternity and first mate sperm precedence in the sierra dome spider, Linyphia litigiosa Keyserfng (Linyphiidae). Anim Behav 41:135–148
Watson PJ (1991b) Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in female sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Anim Behav 41:343–360
Wickler W, Seibt U (1981) Monogamy in crustacea and man. Z Tierpsychol 57:215–234
Wing SR (1988) Cost of mating for female insects: risk of predation in Photinus collustrans (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Am Nat 131:139–142
Wittenberger JF (1979) The evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. In: Master P, Vandenburgh J (eds) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology: social behavior and communication. Plenum, New York, pp 271–349
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by R.F.A. Moritz
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singer, F., Riechert, S.E. Mating system and mating success of the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36, 313–322 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167792
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167792