Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of medigoxin in outpatients

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We compared our ability to predict the dose of medigoxin and of digoxin required to achieve a fixed serum concentration (the dose requirement) in 33 outpatients. Preliminary work supported the assumptions that the steady state glycoside concentration achieved was proportional to the daily dose given to an individual, and that the bioavailability of the different tablet presentations was similar for either glycoside. We were not able to predict the dose requirement from patient characteristics with any more certainty for medigoxin than for digoxin. Not only the between-patient variability in dose requirement, but also the within-patient variability, was similar for the two glycosides. However the digoxin used had a dissolution rate of over 90% in 1 h. When comparing medigoxin with digoxin of lower, or more variable dissolution rate, medigoxin may be preferable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • British Pharmacopoeia (1973), Appendum (1977), pp 18–19, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London

  • Coburn P, Kongola GMW, Mawer GE (1979) Comparison of medigoxin and digoxin in the control of atrial fibrillation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 8: 53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel C, Wood FS (1971) Fitting equations to data. John Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs SM, Mawer GE, Rodgers EM, Woodcock BG, Lucas SB (1976a) Can maintenance digoxin dose requirements be predicted? Br J Clin Pharmacol 3: 231–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs SM, Parkes J, Rodgers EM (1976b) Digoxin: linearity between dose and concentration. Br Med J 1: 694–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs SM, Rodgers EM, Woodcock BG (1976c) Equivalence of Lanoxin tablets. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3: 514–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan AM, Belfield A (1978) Enzyme multiplied immunoassay of serum digoxin using the LKB 2074 Calculating Absorptionmeter. In: Enzymes in health and disease. Inaug Scient Meet Int Soc Clin Enzymol London 1977. Karger, Basel, pp 115–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser EJ, Leach RH, Poston JW, Bold AM, Calank LS, Lepede AB (1973) Dissolution rates and bioavailability of digoxin tablets. Lancet 1: 1393

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward RP, Greenwood H, Hamer J (1978) Comparison of digoxin and medigoxin in normal subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 6: 81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelliffe RW, Brooker G (1974) A nomogram for digoxin therapy. Am J Med 57: 63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BF, Bye CE, Jones GE, Sabey GA (1976) The pharmacokinetics of beta-methyl digoxin compared with digoxin tablets and capsules. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 10: 231–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BF, Greer H, McCrerie J, Bye CE, Fowle A (1973) Rate of dissolution of digoxin tablets as a predictor of absorption. Lancet 1: 1473–1475

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann J, Abshagen U, Rietbrock N (1973) Cleavage of glycoside bonds of digoxin and derivatives as a function of pH and time. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 276: 149–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial (1978) Medigoxin. Lancet 2: 1135

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinow J, Olcay A, Schaumann W, Weiss W (1977) Serum glycoside concentrations after single or repeated intravenous doses of beta-methyl digoxin and digoxin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 11: 213–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson PW, Dobbs SM, McGill APJ, Rodgers EM (1978) A score for prescribing digoxin. Br Heart J 40: 177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson PW, Dobbs SM, Rodgers EM (1980) Ideal sampling time for drug assays. Br J Clin Pharmacol 9: 467–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfors A (1972) Plasma digoxin concentration — its relation to digoxin dosage and clinical effects in patients with atrial fibrillation. Br Heart J 34: 383–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers EM, Dobbs SM, Kenyon WI, Poston J (1977) Evaluation of digoxin capsules in outpatients. Br Med J 2: 234–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal AF, Vargas MG, Klass CS (1976) Evaluation of enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) for determination of serum digoxin. Clin Chem 22: 1899–1902

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé H (1967) The analysis of variance. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Siersbaek-Nielsen K, Hansen JM, Kampmann U, Kristensen M (1971) Rapid evaluation of creatinine clearance. Lancet 1: 1133–1134

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TW, Haber EJ (1970) Digoxin intoxication: the relationship of clinical presentation to serum digoxin concentration. J Clin Invest 49: 2377–2386

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun L, Spiehler V (1976) Radioimmunoassay and enzyme immunoassay compared for determination of digoxin. Clin Chem 22: 2029–2031

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, W.R.D., Rodgers, E.M., Nicholson, P.W. et al. Evaluation of medigoxin in outpatients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 19, 251–258 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00562801

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00562801

Key words

Navigation