Summary
We compared our ability to predict the dose of medigoxin and of digoxin required to achieve a fixed serum concentration (the dose requirement) in 33 outpatients. Preliminary work supported the assumptions that the steady state glycoside concentration achieved was proportional to the daily dose given to an individual, and that the bioavailability of the different tablet presentations was similar for either glycoside. We were not able to predict the dose requirement from patient characteristics with any more certainty for medigoxin than for digoxin. Not only the between-patient variability in dose requirement, but also the within-patient variability, was similar for the two glycosides. However the digoxin used had a dissolution rate of over 90% in 1 h. When comparing medigoxin with digoxin of lower, or more variable dissolution rate, medigoxin may be preferable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
British Pharmacopoeia (1973), Appendum (1977), pp 18–19, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London
Coburn P, Kongola GMW, Mawer GE (1979) Comparison of medigoxin and digoxin in the control of atrial fibrillation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 8: 53–58
Daniel C, Wood FS (1971) Fitting equations to data. John Wiley, London
Dobbs SM, Mawer GE, Rodgers EM, Woodcock BG, Lucas SB (1976a) Can maintenance digoxin dose requirements be predicted? Br J Clin Pharmacol 3: 231–237
Dobbs SM, Parkes J, Rodgers EM (1976b) Digoxin: linearity between dose and concentration. Br Med J 1: 694–695
Dobbs SM, Rodgers EM, Woodcock BG (1976c) Equivalence of Lanoxin tablets. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3: 514–515
Duncan AM, Belfield A (1978) Enzyme multiplied immunoassay of serum digoxin using the LKB 2074 Calculating Absorptionmeter. In: Enzymes in health and disease. Inaug Scient Meet Int Soc Clin Enzymol London 1977. Karger, Basel, pp 115–117
Fraser EJ, Leach RH, Poston JW, Bold AM, Calank LS, Lepede AB (1973) Dissolution rates and bioavailability of digoxin tablets. Lancet 1: 1393
Hayward RP, Greenwood H, Hamer J (1978) Comparison of digoxin and medigoxin in normal subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 6: 81–86
Jelliffe RW, Brooker G (1974) A nomogram for digoxin therapy. Am J Med 57: 63–68
Johnson BF, Bye CE, Jones GE, Sabey GA (1976) The pharmacokinetics of beta-methyl digoxin compared with digoxin tablets and capsules. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 10: 231–236
Johnson BF, Greer H, McCrerie J, Bye CE, Fowle A (1973) Rate of dissolution of digoxin tablets as a predictor of absorption. Lancet 1: 1473–1475
Kuhlmann J, Abshagen U, Rietbrock N (1973) Cleavage of glycoside bonds of digoxin and derivatives as a function of pH and time. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 276: 149–56
Editorial (1978) Medigoxin. Lancet 2: 1135
Marinow J, Olcay A, Schaumann W, Weiss W (1977) Serum glycoside concentrations after single or repeated intravenous doses of beta-methyl digoxin and digoxin. Br J Clin Pharmacol 11: 213–218
Nicholson PW, Dobbs SM, McGill APJ, Rodgers EM (1978) A score for prescribing digoxin. Br Heart J 40: 177–183
Nicholson PW, Dobbs SM, Rodgers EM (1980) Ideal sampling time for drug assays. Br J Clin Pharmacol 9: 467–470
Redfors A (1972) Plasma digoxin concentration — its relation to digoxin dosage and clinical effects in patients with atrial fibrillation. Br Heart J 34: 383–391
Rodgers EM, Dobbs SM, Kenyon WI, Poston J (1977) Evaluation of digoxin capsules in outpatients. Br Med J 2: 234–235
Rosenthal AF, Vargas MG, Klass CS (1976) Evaluation of enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) for determination of serum digoxin. Clin Chem 22: 1899–1902
Scheffé H (1967) The analysis of variance. Wiley, New York
Siersbaek-Nielsen K, Hansen JM, Kampmann U, Kristensen M (1971) Rapid evaluation of creatinine clearance. Lancet 1: 1133–1134
Smith TW, Haber EJ (1970) Digoxin intoxication: the relationship of clinical presentation to serum digoxin concentration. J Clin Invest 49: 2377–2386
Sun L, Spiehler V (1976) Radioimmunoassay and enzyme immunoassay compared for determination of digoxin. Clin Chem 22: 2029–2031
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, W.R.D., Rodgers, E.M., Nicholson, P.W. et al. Evaluation of medigoxin in outpatients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 19, 251–258 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00562801
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00562801