Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of structure-localized mercury in Ottawa river sediments by scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive x-ray microanalysis technique

  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

Sediment samples of Ottawa River were examined using a relatively new technique, electron microscopy/energy dispersive (EM/ED) microanalyzer, to identify and document the binding sites for mercury on sediments and biota. Samples were deposited on a Nucleopore filter, dried, and then mounted on an aluminum stub for EM/ED analysis. Better images for documentation were obtained by depositing the samples directly on a carbon planchet, thus eliminating the insulation from the filter and the x-ray emmission from the aluminum stub. The salient features of ED x-ray microanalyzer, such as identification of most major and minor elements in a single analysis, and simple spectrum of x-ray energies versus atomic number of elements, are listed. Pitfalls in the methodology of the positive identification of elements resulting from peak shifting and peak overlap in the complex spectra of environmental samples are discussed. Remedies for successful resolution of broad spectra into individual elemental peaks are clearly outlined. Analyses of sediment samples revealed the presence of a variety of structures in aquatic environments with varying elemental compositions. Data gathered on mercury-bearing structures in the present study showed that mercury binding is on sulfur sites but never in a stoichiometric ratio; not all sulfur sites accumulated mercury. Possible reasons for sulfur sites void of mercury are (1) uneven distribution of binding sites, (2) concentrations of mercury too low to saturate all the binding sites, or (3) possible desorption of mercury from the binding sites by either chemical or biologic processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrland, S., 1966, Reports on soft acids and bases—Factors contributing to (b) behavior in acceptors: Struct. Bonding, v. 1, p. 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akagi, H., Fujita, Y., and E. Takabatake, 1977, Methyl mercury: Photochemical transformation of mercuric sulfide into methyl mercury in aqueous solutions: Photochem. and photobiol., v. 26, p. 363–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brydon, J. E., and L. M. Patry, 1961, Mineralogy of Champlain sea sediments and a Rideau clay soil profile: Can. Jour. Soil Sci., v. 41, p. 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheremisinoff, P. N., and Y. H. Habib, 1972, Cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury: a plenary account for water pollution, Part 1—Occurrence, toxicity, and detection: Water and Sewage Works, v. 119, no. 7, p. 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Itri, F. M., 1972, The environmental mercury problem: Ohio, Chemical Rubber Co. Press, 124 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, L., 1972, Natural non-nutrient substances in the food chain: Sci. Total Environ., v. 1, no. 3, p. 211–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavis, J., and J. F. Ferguson, 1972, The cycling of mercury through the environment: Water Res., v. 6, p. 989–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, S. R., and A. Jernelov, 1969, Biological methylation of mercury in aquatic organisms: Nature, v. 223, p. 753–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson, I. R., 1970, Mercury in the natural environment: A review of recent work: Geol. Survey of Canada Paper, p. 70–57.

  • Kudo, A., and J. S. Hart, 1974, Uptake of inorganic mercury by bed sediments: Jour. Environ. Quality, v. 3, p. 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landner, L. 1971, Biochemical Model for the biological methylation of mercury suggested from methylation studiesin vivo withNeurospora crassa: Nature, v. 230, p. 452–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamoorthy, S., and B. R. Rust, 1976, Mercury sorption and desorption characteristics of some Ottawa river sediments: Can. Jour. Earth. Sci., v. 13, no. 4, p. 530–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, B. R., and D. G. Waslenchuk, 1976, Mercury and bed sediment in the Ottawa River, Canada: Jour. Sedimen. Petrol., v. 46, no. 3, p. 563–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillen, L. G., and A. E. Martell, 1971, Stability constants of metal-ion complexes: London, The Chemical Society, Supplement no. 1, Special Pub no. 25.

  • Walsh, C. J., 1975, Modern X-ray analysis—III; energy dispersive analysis of X-rays and the electron microscope: EDAX Internationl Inc., P.O. Box 135, Prairie View, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, J., 1967, Analystika aspeckter pa uslapp till vattendrag av mettalliskt och oorganiskt kvicksilver: Analysdager, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodke, N. F., Jr., and F. Schamber, 1976, NS-885, Super ML; operation and program description: Middleton, Wisconsin, Tracor-Northern, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. M., F. S. Kennedy, and C. G. Rosen, 1968, Synthesis of methyl mercury compounds by extracts of a methanogenic bacterium: Nature, v. 220, p. 173–174.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramamoorthy, S., Massalski, A. Analysis of structure-localized mercury in Ottawa river sediments by scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive x-ray microanalysis technique. Geo 2, 351–357 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380509

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380509

Keywords

Navigation