Abstract
This paper addresses the topic of validating structural optimization methods by use of experimental results. The paper describes the need for validating the methods as a way of effecting a greater and an accelerated acceptance of formal optimization methods by practicing engineering designers. The range of validation strategies is defined which includes comparison of optimization results with more traditional design approaches, establishing the accuracy of analyses used, and finally experimental validation of the optimization results. The remainder of the paper describes examples of the use of experimental results to validate optimization techniques. The examples include experimental validation of the following: optimum design of a trussed beam; combined control-structure design of a cable-supported beam simulating an actively controlled space structure; minimum weight design of a beam with frequency constraints; minimization of the vibration response of helicopter rotor blade; minimum weight design of a turbine blade disk; aeroelastic optimization of an aircraft vertical fin; airfoil shape optimization for drag minimization; optimization of the shape of a hole in a plate for stress minimization; optimization to minimize beam dynamic response; and structural optimization of a low vibration helicopter rotor.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelman, H.M.; Mantay, W.R. 1991: Integrated multidisciplinary optimization of rotorcraft.J. Aircraft 28, 22–28
Chen, J. 1987: Dynamic structural optimization and experiment. Report No.ISTIC-TR-C-000195, Northwestern Polytechnical University Xian (China), (available as NTI SHC A02/MF A01)
Cullimore, M.S.G.; Larnach, W.J. 1979: The optimum design of a trussed beam. In: Rhodes, J.; Walker, A.C. (eds.)Proceedings of Thin-walled structures, pp. 441–454. New York: John Wiley & Sons
Durelli, A.J.; Azarm, S.; Bhandarkar, S. 1989: Optimized hole shapes in a tall beam.Experimental Mech. 424–431
Haftka, R.T.; Martinovic, Z.N.; Hallauer, W.L., Jr. 1985: Enchanced vibration controllability by minor structural modifications.AIAA J. 23, 1260–1266
Reneaux, J.; and Allongue, M. 1989: Definitions de profiles et de pales d' helicoptere par optimization numerique.Proc. Comp. Meth. Aerodynamic Design (Inverse) and Optimization. (held in Loen, Norway), AGARD-CP-463, 19.1–19.12
Schneider, G.; Honlinger, H.; Guldner, W. 1989: Aeroelastic tailoring validation by wind tunnel model testing.Proc. European Forum on Aeroelasticity and Struct. Dynamics. Aachen, Germany, DGLR-Bericht 89-01, 399–408
Watts, D.; Starkey, J. 1990: Design optimization of response amplitudes in viscously damped structures.J. Vibration and Acoustics 112, 275–280
Weller, W.H.; Davis, M.W. 1988: Experimental verification of helicopter blade designs optimized for minimum vibration.Proc. 44th Annual Forum of AHS. (held in Washington DC.), 263–279
Weller, W.H.; Davis, M.W. 1990: A modal-based procedure for efficiently predicting low vibration rotor designs.Proc. 46th Annual Forum of AHS. (held in Washington DC.), 403–416
Young, D.K.; Tarzanin, Frank J., Jr. 1991: Structural optimization and mach scale test validation of a low vibration Rotor.Proc. 47th Annual Forum of AHS. (held in Phoenix, AZ), pp. 955–968
Yu, X.; Ma, M.; Chen, G. 1989: Optimum shape design of rotating disks and experimental research.ASME paper 89-GT-40. Presented at Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, Toronto, Canada
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by J. Sobieski
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adelman, H.M. Experimental validation of the utility of structural optimization. Structural Optimization 5, 3–11 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01744689
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01744689