Skip to main content
Log in

A family of homogeneous analysis models for the design of scalable structures

  • Originals
  • Published:
Structural optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research in optimum structural design has shown that mathematical programming techniques can be employed efficiently only in conjunction with explicit approximate constraints. In the course of time a well-established approximation for homogeneous functions (scalable structures) has emerged based on the linear Taylor expansion of the displacement functions in the compliance design space (Reciprocal approximation). It has been shown that the quality of this approximation is based on the property that homogeneity of the constraints is maintained and consequently the approximation is exact along the scaling line.

The present paper presents a new family of approximations of homogenous functions which have the same properties as the Reciprocal approximation and which produce more accurate models in most of the tested cases. The approximations are obtained by mapping the direct linear Taylor expansion of the constraints unto a space spanned by intervening variables (original design variables to a powerm). Taking the envelope of these constraints along the scaling line yields a new family of approximations governed by the parameterm. It is shown that the Reciprocal approximation is a particular member of this family of approximations (m = −1).

The new technique is illustrated with classical examples of truss optimization. An optimal plate design is also reported. A parametric study of the results for various values of the exponentm is presented. It is shown that for special values of the exponentm the new approximations usually yield better models than those based on the Reciprocal approximation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armand, J.L.; Lodier, B. 1978: Optimal design of bending elements.J. Num. Meth. Eng. 13, 373–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C. 1979: A unified approach to structural weight minimization.J. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 20, 17–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C.; Sander, G. 1981: Dual methods for optimizing finite element flexural systems.Report SA-87, Aerospace Laboratory Liège, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M.B. 1980: Linearized homogeneous constraints in structural design.Int. J. Mech. Sci. 22, 33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M.B. 1982: Explicit optimum design.Int. J. Solids and Struct. 18, 13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, M.B. 1983: Explicit optimum design technique for linear elastic trusses.J. Eng. Opt. 6, 213–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Haj Ali, R.M. 1989:Generalized approximations of homogeneous constraints in optimal structural design. M.Sc. Thesis, Dept. Solid Mechanics, Materials and Structures, Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University (in Hebrew)

  • Haug, E.J.; Arora, J.S. 1979:Applied optimal design. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K. 1977: Configuration optmization of trusses by the multiplier method.UCLA-ENG-7842, School of Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, U. 1984: Approximate behaviour models for optimum structural design. In: Attrek, E.et al. (eds.)New directions in optimum structural design, Chapter 17, pp. 365–384. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, R.; Ovdia, E.L. 1987: Recent developments in structural optimization.J. Struct. Eng. 113, 1939–1962

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, B 1983: Explicit constraint approximation forms in structural optimization. Part I: analysis and projections.J. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 40, 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, B.; Haftka, R.T. 1979: Optimal structural design with plate finite elements.J. Struct. Div. ASCE 105, 2367–2382

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, L.A. 1960: Structural design by systematic synthesis.Proc. Second Conf. Electronic Computation, ASCE (held in Pittsburgh, Pa.), pp. 105–132

  • Schmit, L.A. 1981: Structural synthesis — its genesis and development.AIAA J. 16, 1249–1262

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, L.A.; Farshi, B. 1974: Some approximation concepts for structural synthesis.AIAA J. 12, 692–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Starnes, J.H.; Haftka, R.T. 1979: Preliminary design of composite wings for buckling, stress and displacement constraints.J. Aircraft 16, 564–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderplaats, G.N. 1984: ADS — A Fortran program for automated design synthesis.NASA-CR 172460

  • Venkayya, V.B. 1971: Design of optimum structures.J. Comp. Struct. 1, 265–309

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuchs, M.B., Haj Ali, R.M. A family of homogeneous analysis models for the design of scalable structures. Structural Optimization 2, 143–152 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01836563

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01836563

Keywords

Navigation