Abstract
This paper investigates the impact of union coverage on sectoral wages in the Netherlands. The semi-elasticity of the wage rate with respect to union coverage appears to be around 0.05; it is higher in the industrial than in the other sectors. The impact of union coverage on wages appears to be lower in the Netherlands than in the US and the UK. Union coverage increases the weight of internal (sector-specific) factors in wage determination and decreases the weight of external (labour market) factors. Apparently, unions increase the role of rent sharing in wage formation and stabilize employment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arellano M, Bond S (1988) Dynamic panel data estimation using DPD: A guide for users. Working paper 88/15, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London
Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58:277–297
Bakker K, Prince YM (1992) DUMA: Industriebestand 1974–1986, drie-digit bedrijfsgroepen. Data research 2, EIM, Zoetermeer
Calmfors L (1993) Centralisation of wage bargaining and macroeconomic performance: A survey. Working paper 131, Economics Department, OECD, Paris
Calmfors L, Driffill J (1988) Bargaining structure, corporatism and macroeconomic performance. Economic Policy 6:13–62
Freeman RB, Medoff JL (1981) The impact of the percentage organized on union and nonunion wages. The Review of Economics and Statistics 63:561–572
Graafland JJ, Lever MHC (1996) Internal and external forces in sectoral wage formation: evidence from the Netherlands. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 58:241–252
Hamermesh DS (1993) Labor demand. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hartog J, Teulings CN (1994) Markets, institutions and wages. Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, the Hague, forthcoming
Layard PRG, Metcalf D, Nickell SJ (1978) The effect of collective bargaining on relative and absolute wages. British Journal of Industrial Relations 16(3):287–301
Layard PRG, Nickell SJ, Jackman R (1991) Unemployment: Macroeconomic performance and the labour market. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lever MHC (1995a) Insider-outsider effects in wage formation: An empirical survey. Bulletin of Economic Research 47(4):257–274
Lever MHC (1995b) Firm size and employment determination in Dutch manufacturing industries. Research report 9509/E, EIM, Zoetermeer; forthcoming in Small Business Economics
Lever MHC, Van Werkhooven JM (1996) Insider power, market power, firm size and wages: Evidence from Dutch manufacturing industries. Forthcoming in Labour Economics 3(1)
Lewis HG (1986) Union relative wage effects. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Moene KO, Wallerstein M, Hoel M (1993) Bargaining structure and economic performance. In: Flanagan RJ, Moene KO, Wallerstein M. Trade union behaviour, pay-bargaining, and economic performance, Clarendon Press, Oxford
Nickell SJ, Wadhwani S (1990) Insider forces and wage determination. The Economic Journal 100:496–509
Nickell SJ, Vainiomaki J, Wadhwani S (1994) Wages and product market power. Economica 61:457–473
OECD (1994a) Employment outlook. OECD, Paris
OECD (1994b) The OECD jobs study: Evidence and explanations, part II, chapter 5. OECD, Paris
OECD (1994c) Economic surveys 1993–1994: Netherlands. OECD, Paris
Podgursky M (1986) Unions, establishment size, and intra-industry threat effects. Industrial and Labour Relations Review 39(2):277–284
Stewart MB (1991) Union wage differentials in the face of changes in the economic and legal environment. Economica 58:155–172
Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal (1993) Algemeen verbindend verklaren van caobepalingen. Vergaderjaar 1993–1994, kamerstuk 23.532, no. 2, bijlage
Van Opstal R, Wiggers G (1996) Cao en avv leiden niet tot lagere lonen. Economisch Statistische Berichten 4040:35–38
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lever, M.H.C., Marquering, W.A. Union coverage and sectoral wages: Evidence from the Netherlands. Empirical Economics 21, 483–499 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01180697
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01180697