Skip to main content
Log in

The HUMP-shaped behavior of macroeconomic fluctuations

  • Structural Change Analysis
  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze the nature of persistence in macroeconomic fluctuations. The current view is that shocks to macroeconomic variables (in particular realGNP) have effects that endure over an indefinite horizon. This conclusion is drawn from the presence of a unit root in the univariate time series representation. Following Perron (1989), we challenge this assessment arguing that most macroeconomic variables are better construed as stationary fluctuations around a breaking trend function. The trend function is linear in time except for a sudden change in its intercept in 1929 (The Great Crash) and a change in slope after 1973 (following the oil price shock). Using a measure of persistence suggested by Cochrane (1988) we find that shocks have small permanent effects, if any. To analyze the effects of shocks at finite horizon, we select a member of theARMA(p, q) class applied to the appropriately detrended series. For the majority of the variables analyzed the implied weights of the moving-average representation have the once familiar humped shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews DWK (1991) Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation. Econometrica 59:817–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC 19:716–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1976) Canonical correlation analysis in time series and the use of an information criterion. In: System identification: Advances and case studies Mehra RK, Lainiotis DG (eds) New York: Academic Press 52–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Balke NS, Gordon RJ (1986) Historical data appendix. In: The American business cycle: Continuity and change, Gordon RJ (ed) Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 781–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard OJ (1981) What is left of the multiplier accelerator?. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 71:150–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard OJ, Quah D (1989) The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review 79:655–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder AS (1981) Retail inventory behavior and business fluctuations. Brookings Paper on Economic Activity 2:443–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder AS (1986) Can the production smoothing model of inventory behavior be saved?. Quarterly Journal of Economics 101:431–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder AS, Holtz-Eakin D (1986) Inventory fluctuations in the United States since 1929. In: The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change, Gordon RJ (ed) Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 183–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1970) Time series analysis: Forecasting and Control, Holden Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Tiao GC (1975) Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70:70–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JY, Mankiw NG (1987a) Are output fluctuations transitory?. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102:857–880

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JY, Mankiw NG (1987b) Permanent and transitory components in macroeconomic fluctuations. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 77:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell JY, Mankiw NG (1989) International evidence on the persistence of economic fluctuations. Journal of Monetary Economics 23:319–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti SG, Lam P-S (1991) What do we learn from variance ratio statistics? A study of stationary and nonstationary models with breaking trends. Mimeo

  • Clark PK (1987) The cyclical component of US economic activity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102:798–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane JH (1988) How big is the random walk inGNP. Journal of Political Economy 96:893–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:427–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans GW (1989) Output and unemployment dynamics in the United States: 1950–1985. Journal of Applied Econometrics 4:213–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M, Schwartz AJ (1982) Monetary trends in the United States and the United Kingdom: Their relation to income, prices and interest rates 1867–1975 Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR, Plosser CI (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Monetary Economics 10:139–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57:1361–1401

    Google Scholar 

  • Perron P (1990) Testing for a unit root in a time series with a changing mean. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 8:153–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Perron P (1991) Further evidence of breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. Mimeo, Princeton University

  • Perron P, Ng S (1992) The exact error in estimating the spectral density at the origin. Mimeo, Princeton University

  • Perron P, Phillips PCB (1987) DoesGNP have a unit root? A reevaluation. Economics Letters 23:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Ouliaris S (1988) Testing for cointegration using principal components methods. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12:205–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestly MB (1981) Spectral analysis and time series. Academic Press: New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj B (1992) International evidence on persistence in output in the presence of an episodic change. Journal of Applied Econometrics 7:281–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj B (1993) The size of the random walk in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Macroeconomics 15:139–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6:461–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Watson MW (1986) DoesGNP have a unit root?. Economics Letters 22:147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson MW (1986) Univariate detrending methods with stochastic trends. Journal of Monetary Economics 18:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Zivot E, Andrews DWK (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10:251–270

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to thank Christian Dea and Serena Ng for research assistance as well as Charles Nelson and John Campbell who kindly provided some of the data used in this study. Research support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l'Aide à la Recherche du Québec is acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perron, P. The HUMP-shaped behavior of macroeconomic fluctuations. Empirical Economics 18, 707–727 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205417

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205417

Key words

JEL Classification System-Numbers

Navigation