Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity Analysis of Kernel Estimates: Implications in Nonlinear Physiological System Identification

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many techniques have been developed for the estimation of the Volterra/Wiener kernels of nonlinear systems, and have found extensive application in the study of various physiological systems. To date, however, we are not aware of methods for estimating the reliability of these kernels from single data records. In this study, we develop a formal analysis of variance for least-squares based nonlinear system identification algorithms. Expressions are developed for the variance of the estimated kernel coefficients and are used to place confidence bounds around both kernel estimates and output predictions. Specific bounds are developed for two such identification algorithms: Korenberg's fast orthogonal algorithm and the Laguerre expansion technique. Simulations, employing a model representative of the peripheral auditory system, are used to validate the theoretical derivations, and to explore their sensitivity to assumptions regarding the system and data. The simulations show excellent agreement between the variances of kernel coefficients and output predictions as estimated from the results of a single trial compared to the same quantities computed from an ensemble of 1000 Monte Carlo runs. These techniques were validated with white and nonwhite Gaussian inputs and with white Gaussian and nonwhite non-Gaussian measurement noise on the output, provided that the output noise source was independent of the test input.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Amorocho, J., and A. Brandstetter. Determination of nonlinear functional response functions in rainfall runoff processes. Water Resour. Res.7:1087-1101, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beck, J. V., and K. J. Arnold. Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science. New York: Wiley, 1977, pp. 213- 333.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Billings, S. A., and W. S. F. Voon. Correlation based model validity tests for non-linear models. Int. J. Control44:235- 244, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd, S., and L. O. Chua. Fading memory and the problem of approximating nonlinear operators with Volterra series. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst.CAS-32:1150-1161, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chon, K. H., Y. M. Chen, V. Z. Marmarelis, D. J. Marsh, and N. H. Holstein-Rathlou. Detection of interactions between myogenic and TGF mechanisms using nonlinear analysis. Am. J. Physiol.267:F160-F173, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chon, K. H., N.-H. Holstein-Rathlou, D. J. Marsh, and V. Z. Marmarelis. Parametric and nonparametric nonlinear modeling of renal autoregulation dynamics. In: Advanced Methods of Physiological System Modeling, Vol. 3, edited by V. Z. Marmarelis. New York: Plenum, 1994, pp. 195-210.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Efron, B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1982, pp. 29-35.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Emerson, R. C., M. J. Korenberg, and M. C. Citron. Identi-fication of complex-cell intensive nonlinearities in a cascade model of cat visual cortex. Biol. Cybern.66:291-300, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. French, A. S., and M. J. Korenberg. Disection of a nonlinear cascade model for sensory encoding. Ann. Biomed. Eng.19:473-484, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. French, A. S., A. E. C. Pece, and M. J. Korenberg. Nonlinear models of transduction and adaptation in Locust photoreceptors. In: Advanced Methods of Physiological System Modeling, Vol. 2, edited by V. Z. Marmarelis. New York: Plenum, 1989, pp. 81-95.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hunter, I. W., and M. J. Korenberg. The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Wiener and Hammerstein cascade models. Biol. Cybern.55:135-144, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Korenberg, M. J. Functional expansions, parallel cascades, and nonlinear difference equations. In: Advanced Methods of Physiological System Modeling, Vol. 1, edited by V. Z. Marmarelis. New York: Plenum, 1987, pp. 221-240.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Korenberg, M. J. Identifying nonlinear difference equation and functional expansion representations: The fast orthogonal algorithm. Ann. Biomed. Eng.16:123-142, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Korenberg, M. J. Parallel cascade identification and kernel estimation for nonlinear systems. Ann. Biomed. Eng.19:429- 455, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Korenberg, M. J., and I. W. Hunter. The identification of nonlinear biological systems: LNL cascade models. Biol. Cybern.55:125-134, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Korenberg, M. J., and I. W. Hunter. The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Wiener kernel approaches. Ann. Biomed. Eng.18:629-654, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Korenberg, M. J., and I. W. Hunter. The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Volterra kernel approaches. Ann. Biomed. Eng.24:250-268, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Korenberg, M. J., H. M. Sakai, and K.-I. Naka. Dissection of the neuron network in the catfish inner retina. III interpretation of spike kernels. J. Neurophysiol.61:1110-1120, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee Y. W., and M. Schetzen. Measurement of the Wiener kernels of a non-linear system by cross-correlation. Int. J. Control2:237-254, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ljung, L. System Identification: Theory for the User. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1987, pp. 434-456.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marmarelis, V. Z. Identification of nonlinear biological systems using Laguerre expansions of kernels. Ann. Biomed. Eng.21:573-589, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marmarelis, V. Z., K. H. Chon, Y. M. Chen, D. J. Marsh, and N. H. Holstein-Rathlou. Nonlinear analysis of renal autoregulation under broadband forcing conditions. Ann. Biomed. Eng.21:591-603, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marmarelis, P. Z., and V. Z. Marmarelis. Analysis of Physiological Systems. New York: Plenum, 1978, pp. 1-487.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pfeiffer, R. R. A model for two-tone inhibition of single cochlear nerve fibres. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.48:1373-1378, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sakuranaga, M., S. Sato, E. Hida, and K-I. Naka. Nonlinear analysis: mathematical theory and biological applications. CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng.14:127-184, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Swerup, C. On the choice of noise for the analysis of the peripheral auditory system. Biol. Cybern.29:97-104, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Watanabe, A., and L. Stark. Kernel method for nonlinear analysis: identification of a biological control system. Math. Biosci.27:99-108, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, Q., B. Suki, D. T. Westwick, and K. R. Lutchen. Factors affecting Volterra kernel estimation: Emphasis on lung tissue viscoelasticity. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 26:103-116.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westwick, D.T., Suki, B. & Lutchen, K.R. Sensitivity Analysis of Kernel Estimates: Implications in Nonlinear Physiological System Identification. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 26, 488–501 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.40

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.40

Navigation