Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge Creation within Industrial Systems

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intangible resources are the source of competitive advantage in theknowledge economy. Knowledge and intellectual capital within firms havegathered worldwide attention; theories and methods for knowledgecreation management have been developed for organizations and alliances.Economic reality shows the importance of industrial districts becausesocial systems in districts provide dynamic contexts of multifacetedrelationships. These dynamic contexts or district ba (Japanesefor place) enable firms to create and harness knowledge that resides innetwork relationships.

The paper develops a theoretical frame of four kinds of district ba thatsupport four knowledge processes. Organizational networks within andbetween different district ba are conceptualized. The creationof knowledge within district ba is used to analyze differentlevels of interaction between firms in the same or different districtsand in the same or different industries. The case study of the JETROlocal-to-local program between Ishikawa prefecture in Japan and Como andVarese in Italy is used to illustrate the theoretical concepts. Districtba are used to analyze the knowledge creation dynamics withinand between districts and to identify possible strategies for districtgovernance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, N.: 1998, “Manufacturing, Services to be the 'Twin Engines of Growth' - Eight Strategies for Singapore”, The Sunday Times, March 8, p. 27.

  • Becattini, G.: 1987, “Sector and/or Districts: Some Remarks on the Conceptual Foundations of Industrial Economics”, in Goodman and J. Bamford (eds.), Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy(New York: Routledge), pp. 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G.: 1987, “Il distretto industriale marshalliano: cronaca di un ritrovamento”, in G. Beccattini (ed.), Mercato e forze locali: il distretto industriale, Il (Mulino: Bologna), pp. 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, M.: 1990, The New Competition: Institutions of Industrial Restructuring(Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Booz Allen and Hamilton: 1997, Vision Korea - Revitalizing the Korean Economy toward the 21st Century(Seoul: Korea Development Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursi, T., G. Marghi and G. Nardin: 1997, “Trasformazioni organizzative nell'impresa distrettuale: alcune premesse sulla definizione dell'unita di analisi”, in R. Varaldo and L. Ferrucci (eds.), Il distretto industriale tra logiche di impresa e logiche di sistema(Franco Angeli: Milano), pp. 107–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cluster Conocimiento: 1998, “The Strategic Management: Knowledge as a Regional System - the Case of the Basque Country”, Strategic Management Society Annual Conference(Orlando).

  • Corno, F.: 1998, “Value Creation Within Districts”, paper presented at Value Creation Within Districts in a Global Perspective, conference at LIUC, Castellanza, July.

  • Corno, F.: 1989, Sapere imprenditoriale e governo dell'impresa(Egea: Milano).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, F.: 1997, Patrimonio Intangibile e governo dell'impresa(Egea, Milano).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei Ottati, G.: 1991, “The Economic Bases of Diffused Industrialization”, International Studies of Management and Organization21(1): 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa Prefecture Government: 1999, Industries of Ishikawa Prefecture(Kanazawa) (in Japanese).

  • Ishikawa Prefecture Government: 1997, Industry and Commerce Outline(Kanazawa).

  • Larson, A.: 1992, “Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships”, Administrative Science Quarterly(37): 76–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazerson, M.H. and G. Lorenzoni: 1998, The Firms that Feed Industrial Districts: A Return to the Italian Source, unpublished.

  • Lipparini, A.: 1998, “Assetti relazionali per lo sviluppo e l'integrazione delle competenze”, in A. Lipparini (ed.), Le competenze organizzative(Roma: Carocci), pp. 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E.: 1998, “Neither Friends nor Strangers”, in D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations(Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 194–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni, G.: 1997, “Imprese, relazioni tra imprese, distretti industriali nello sviluppo delle P.M.I.”, in R. Varaldo and L. Ferrucci (eds.), Il distretto industriale tra logiche di impresa e logiche di sistema(Franco Angeli: Milano).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Economic Affairs: 1998, Kennis in Beweging(Sdu: The Hague).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi: 1995, The Knowledge Creating Company(New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and N. Konno: 1998, “The Concept of Ba: Building a Foundation for Knowledtge Creation”, California Management Review(Spring) 40(3): 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and P. Reinmoeller: 1998, “Legacy of Learning”, WZB Yearbook(Berlin: Sigma), pp. 401–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., P. Reinmoeller and T. Shibata: 1998, “Knowledge and Regions”, Office Automation19(4): 3–13(in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., P. Reimoeller and D. Senoo: 1998, “The Art of Knowledge: Systems to Capitalize on Market Knowledge”, European Management Journal(December) 16(6): 673–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratti, R, A. Bramanti and R. Gordon: 1997, The Dynamics of Innovative Regions: The GREMI Approach(Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, D. and T. Mandeville: 1998, “The Knowing Nation: A Framework for Public Policy in a Post-Industrial Knowledge Economy”, Prometheus16(4): 453–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullani, E.: 1997, “L'evoluzione dei distretti industriali: un percorso tra de-costruzione e internazionalizzazione”, in R. Varaldo and L. Ferrucci (eds.), Il distretto industriale tra logiche di impresa e logiche di sistema(Franco Angeli: Milano).

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretary of State for Trade and Industry: 1998, Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge Driven Economy(London).

  • Unic: 1999, Intellectual Capital of Nations, www.unic.net

  • Uzzi, B.: 1997, “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: the Paradox of Embeddedness”, Administrative Science Quarterly: 35–67.

  • Von Krogh, G., I. Nonaka and K. Ichijo: 2000, Enabling Knowledge Creation(New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varaldo, R. and L. Ferrucci: 1997, “La natura e la dinamica dell'impresa distrettuale”, in R. Varaldo and L. Ferrucci (eds.), Il distretto industriale tra logiche di impresa e logiche di sistema(Franco Angeli: Milano), pp. 26–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corno, F., Reinmoeller, P. & Nonaka, I. Knowledge Creation within Industrial Systems. Journal of Management & Governance 3, 379–394 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009936712733

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009936712733

Keywords

Navigation