Skip to main content
Log in

Penalty Function Approach to Linear Trilevel Programming

  • Published:
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study a trilevel decision-making situation in which decisionmaker 1 selects an action, within a specified constraint set, then decisionmaker 2 selects an action within a constraint set determined by the action of decisionmaker 2, and finally decisionmaker 3 selects an action within a constraint set determined by the actions of decisionmakers 1 and 2. Each decisionmaker has an objective function to be optimized within the imposed constraint set. Bard (Ref. 1) presents a five-step algorithm for solving this problem. This paper presents an alternative approach to the key first step of that algorithm, which has some qualitative advantages over it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bard, J. F., An Investigation of the Linear Three-Level Programming Problem, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 14, pp. 711–717, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wen, U. P., and Hsu, S. T., Linear Bilevel Programming Problems: A Review, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 42, pp. 125–134, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vincente, L. N., and Calamai, P., Bilevel and Multilevel Programming: A Bibliography Review, Journal of Global Optimization, Vol. 5, pp. 291–306, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wen, U. P., and Bialas, W., The Hybrid Algorithm for Solving the Three-Level Programming Problem, Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 13, pp. 367–377, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benson, H. P., On the Structure and Properties of a Linear Multilevel Programming Problem, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Vol. 9, pp. 353–373, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bard, J., and Falk, J., An Explicit Solution to the Multilevel Programming Problem, Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 9, pp. 77–100, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cassidy, R. G., Kirby, M. J. L., and Raike, W. M., Efficient Distribution of Resources through Three Levels of Government, Management Science, Vol. 17B, pp. 462–473, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wen, U. P., Mathematical Methods for Multilevel Linear Programming, PhD Dissertation, Department of Industrial Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1981.

  9. Zangwill, W. I., Nonlinear Programming: A Unified Approach, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  10. White, D. J., and Anandalingam, G., A Penalty Function Approach for Solving Bilevel Linear Programs, Journal of Global Optimization, Vol. 3, pp. 397–419, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tuy, H., Concave Programming under Linear Constraints, Soviet Mathematics, Vol. 5, pp. 1437–1440, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sherali, H. D., and Shetty, C. M., A Finitely Convergent Algorithm for Bilinear Programming Problems Using Polar Cuts and Disjunctive Face Cuts, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 12, pp. 14–31, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Konno, H., A Cutting-Plane Algorithm for Solving Bilinear Programs, Mathematical Programming, Vol. 11, pp. 14–27, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, D.J. Penalty Function Approach to Linear Trilevel Programming. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 93, 183–197 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022610103712

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022610103712

Navigation