Abstract
In a captive group of subjects, we tested the claim (Jacobus and Loy, 1981) that patas monkeys possess a “grimace and gecker” display that functions as a signal of submission/appeasement. The results show the grimace and gecker to be an ineffective preventive both for supplantation and for the continuation of aggression by dominant animals, which suggests that it is not an important display for patas monkeys. Without the grimace and gecker, it appears that patas monkeys lack “formal dominance.” Therefore, we investigated the effects of such a deficency via interspecific comparisons. They suggest that patas monkeys do not differ from cercopithecine species that possess formal dominance with regard to frequency of fighting, intensity of fighting, or rates of postfight reconciliation. Patas show lower rates of allogrooming and higher fight:groom ratios than formal dominance species do. These results support the view that a lack of formal dominance is likely to be correlated with reduced social cohesion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods.Behaviour 49: 227–267.
Andrew, R. J. (1963). The origin and evolution of the calls and facial expressions of the primates.Behaviour 20: 1–109.
Andrew, R. J. (1965). The origins of facial expressions.Sci. Am. 213(4): 88–94.
Bernstein, I., Williams, L., and Ramsay, M. (1983). The expression of aggression in Old World monkeys.Int. J. Primatol. 4: 113–125.
Bolwig, N. (1978). Communicative signals and social behaviour of some African monkeys: A comparative study.Primates 19: 61–99.
Bramblett, C. A. (1978). Is the concept of “control group” valid? A quantitative comparison of behavior of caged baboon groups.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 49: 217–226.
Bygott, J. D. (1979). Agonistic behavior, dominance, and social structure in wild chimpanzees of the Gombe National Park. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.),The Great Apes, Bejamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 405–427.
Cheney, D. L., and Seyfarth, R. M. (1990).How Monkeys See the World. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Chism, J., and Rowell, T. E. (1988). The natural history of patas monkeys. In Gautier-Hion, A., Bourliere, F., Gautier, J.-P., and Kingdom, J. (eds.),A Primate Radiation: Evolutionary Biology of the African Guenons, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp. 412–438.
Cords, M. (1987). Forest guenons and patas monkeys: Male-male competition in one-male groups. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.)Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 98–111.
Demaria, C., and Thierry, B. (1990). Formal biting in stumptailed macaques (Macaca arctoides).Am. J. Primatol. 20: 133–140.
de Waal, F. B. M. (1982).Chimpanzee Politics, Harper and Row, New York.
de Waal, F. B. M. (1986). The integration of dominance and social bonding in primates.Q. Rev. Biol. 61: 459–479.
de Waal, F. (1989a). Dominance “style” and primate socialorganization. In Standen, V., and Foley, R. A. (eds.),Comparative Socioecology, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 243–263.
de Waal, F. (1989b).Peacemaking Among Primates, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
de Waal, F. B. M., and Luttrell, L. M. (1985). The formal hierarchy of rhesus macaques: An investigation of the bared-teeth display.Am. J. Primatol. 9: 73–85.
de Waal, F. B. M., and Luttrell, L. M. (1989). Toward a comparative socioecology of the genusMacaca: Different dominance styles in rhesus and stumptail monkeys.Am. J. Primatol. 19: 83–109.
de Waal, F. B. M., and Yoshihara, D. (1983). Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys.Behaviour 85: 224–241.
Gouzoules, S., and Gouzoules, H. (1987). Kinship. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.),Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 299–305.
Hall, K. R. L. (1965). Behaviour and ecology of the wild patas monkey,Erythrocebus patas, in Uganda.J. Zool. Lond. 148: 15–87.
Hanby, J. P. (1980). Relationships in six groups of rhesus monkeys. I. Networks.Am. J. Phys. Arthropol. 52: 549–564.
Harding, R. S. O., and Olson, D. K. (1986). Patterns of mating among male patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) in Kenya.Am. J. Primatol. 11: 343–358.
Jacobus, S., and Loy, J. (1981). The grimace and gecker: A submissive display among patas monkeys.Primates 22: 393–398.
Kaplan, J. R. (1987). Dominance and affiliation in the Cercopithecini and Papionini: A comparative examination. In Zucker, E. L. (ed.),Comparative Behavior of African Monkeys, A. R. Liss, New York, pp. 127–150.
Kaplan, J. R., and Zucker, E. (1980). Social organization in a group of free ranging patas monkeys.Folia Primatol. 34: 196–213.
Kummer, H. (1971).Primate Societies: Group Techniques of Ecological Adaptation, Aldine-Atherton, Chicago.
Kummer, H. (1974). Distribution of interindividual distances in patas monkeys and gelada baboons.Folia Primatol. 21: 153–160.
Loy, J. (1970). Behavioral responses of free-ranging rhesus monkeys to food shortage.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 33: 263–272.
Loy, J. (1989). Sex and aggression among patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas).Primate Rep. 23: 35–40.
Loy, J., and Harnois, M. (1988). An assessment of dominance and kinship among patas monkeys.Primates 29: 331–342.
Loy, J. D., Loy, K., Keifer, G., and Conaway, C. (1984).The Behavior of Gonadectomized Rhesus Monkeys, Karger, Basel.
McGuire, M. T. (1974).The St. Kitts Vervet, Karger, Basel.
Nakagawa, N. (1989). Activity budget and diet of patas monkeys in Kala Malou National Park, Cameroon: A preliminary report.Primates 30: 27–34.
Nakagawa, N. (1992). Distribution of affiliative behaviors among adult females within a group of wild patas monkeys in a nonmating, nonbirth season.Int. J. Primatol. 13: 73–96.
Noë, R., de Waal, F. B. M., and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1980). Types of dominance in a chimpanzee colony.Folia Primatol. 34: 90–110.
Redican, W. K. (1975). Facial expressions in nonhuman primates. In Rosenblum, L. A. (ed.),Primate Behavior, Vol. 4. Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, Academic Press, New York, pp. 103–194.
Rowell, T. E. (1967). A quantitative comparison of the behaviour of a wild and a caged baboon group.Anim. Behav. 15: 499–509.
Rowell, T. E. (1971). Organization of caged groups of cercopithecus monkeys.Anim. Behav. 19: 625–645.
Rowell, T. E. (1988). The social system of guenons, compared with baboons, macaques and mangabeys. In Gautier-Hion, A., Bourliere, F., Gautier, J.-P., and Kingdon, J. (eds.),A Primate Radiation: Evolutionary Biology of the African Guenons, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 439–451.
Rowell, T. E., and Hartwell, K. M. (1978). The interaction of behavior and reproductive cycles in patas monkeys.Behav. Biol. 24: 141–167.
Rowell, T. E., and Olson, D. K. (1983). Alternative mechanisms of social organization in monkeys.Behaviour 86: 31–54.
Southwick, C. H. (1969). Aggressive behaviour of rhesus monkeys in natural and captive groups. In Garattini, S., and Sigg, E. B. (eds.),Aggressive Behavior: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Biology of Aggressive Behavior, Milan, May, 1968, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp. 32–43.
Starkey, J., Loy, J., Novak, M., and Goy, R. (1989). Comments on oral grooming by patas monkeys, including a comparison with rhesus macaques.Am. J. Primatol. 18: 327–331.
Struhsaker, T. T. (1967).Behavior of Vervet Monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops), University of California Press, Berkeley.
Teas, J., Richie, T., Taylor, H., and Southwick, C. (1980). Population patterns and behavioral ecology of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in Nepal. In Lindburg, D. G. (ed.),The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 247–262.
van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1967). The facial displays of the catarrhine monkeys and apes. In Morris, D. (ed.),Primate Ethology, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 7–68.
Wallen, K. (1982). Influence of female hormonal state on rhesus sexual behavior varies with space for social interaction.Science 217: 375–377.
York, A. D., and Rowell, T. E. (1988). Reconciliation following aggression in patas monkeys,Erythrocebus patas.Anim. Behav. 36: 502–509.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loy, J., Argo, B., Nestell, GL. et al. A reanalysis of patas monkeys' “grimace and gecker” display and a discussion of their lack of formal dominance. International Journal of Primatology 14, 879–893 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220257
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02220257