Skip to main content
Log in

An intensive field trial to assess hazards to birds and mammals from the use of methiocarb as a bird repellent on ripening cherries

  • Paper
  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A field trial was carried out in Kent, UK, in 1980, to assess the possible hazards to wildlife of methiocarb used as a spray to protect ripening cherries from damage by birds. A broad range of studies was undertaken on a single site subjected to a series of five applications. Ground deposition was measured by analysis of strips of chromatography paper and petri dishes placed between lines of trees. Airborne drift was measured on targets up to 11 m above the ground, and methiocarb residues were measured in samples of cherries. Birds were captured by intensive mist-netting throughout the trial, and breeding success was monitored in nest boxes and natural nest sites. Livetraps were set to catch small mammals in the orchard on five occasions during the trial. Systematic searches for possible casualties were made, resulting in the discovery of 21 birds found dead or incapacitated. Levels of activity of plasma, liver and brain esterases were measured in samples taken from several species, and liver slices from House Sparrows, Starlings and Thrushes were examined histologically for signs of cell damage. Samples of breast muscle tissue from Starlings and House Sparrows were analysed by GLC for residues of methiocarb and its principal breakdown product, methiocarb sulfoxide. Overall, the trial revealed that many birds and mammals were exposed to methiocarb, but its effects were largely transient and sublethal. Even a heavy repeated programme of spray applications did not cause any serious hazard to wildlife populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brewer, L.W., Driver, C.J., Kendall, R.J., Lacher, T.E.Jr. and Galindo, J.C. (1988) Avian response to a turf application of Triumph 4E. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 7, 391–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.M., Fletcher, M.R. and Stanley, P.I. (1979) Field surveillance of the wildlife hazard presented by the use of bendiocarb on maize seed. ADAS, Pest Control Chemistry Department Report No. 47.

  • Bunyan, P.J. and Stanley, P.I. (1979) Assessment of the environmental impact of new pesticides for regulation purposes. Proceedings of the 1979 British Crop Protection Conference-Pests and Diseases, Vol. 3, pp. 881–91.

  • Bunyan, P.J., Van denHeuvel, M.J., Stanley, P.I. and Wright, E.N. (1981) An intensive field trial and a multi-site surveillance exercise on the use of aldicarb to investigate methods for the assessment of possible environmental hazards presented by new pesticides. Agro-Ecosystems 7, 239–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, G.B. and Southern, H.N. (1977) The Handbook of British Mammals, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellman, G.L., Courtney, K.D., Andrews, V.Jr. and Featherstone, R.M. (1961) A new rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 7, 88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency (1987) Guidance for the re-registration of pesticide products containing methiocarb as the active ingredient. Washington, DC: Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feare, C.J. (1984) The Starling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D.L. (1990) Problems in the estimation of percent mortality in carcass searching studies. In Somerville, L. and Walker, C.H. eds Pesticide Effects on Terrestrial Wildlife, pp. 285–90. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, R., Marshall, W.D. and King, R.R. (1976) Trifluoroacetylation of Mesurol (4-methylthio-3,5-xylyl-N-methylcarbamate), its sulfoxide, sulfone and phenol analogs for analysis by gas chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 24, 266–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith, P.W. (1990) Intensive study versus extensive monitoring in pesticide field trials. In Somerville, L. and Walker, C.H. eds Pesticide Effects on Terrestrial Wildlife, pp. 217–39. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith, P.W. and Westlake, G.E. (1988) Approaches to hazard assessment for small mammals in cereal fields. In Greaves, M.P., Smith, B.D. and Greig-Smith, P.W. eds Field Methods for the Study of Environmental Effects of Pesticides, p. 303–11. Monograph No. 40. Croydon, UK: British Crop Protection Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, A.R. (1989) Estimating exposure: the identification of species at risk and routes of exposure. In Somerville, L. and Walker, C.H., eds Pesticide Effects on Terrestrial Wildlife, pp. 81–97. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, A.R., Stanley, P.I. and Greig-Smith, P.W. (1987) Birds as indicators of the intensity of use of agricultural pesticides in the UK. In Diamond, A.W. and Filion, F.L. eds The Value of Birds, pp. 119–32. ICBP Technical Publication 7. Cambridge: ICBP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegdal, P.L. and Colvin, B. (1988) Potential hazard to Eastern Screech-owls and other raptors of brodifacoum bait used for vole control in orchards. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 7, 245–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hothem, R.L., Mott, D.F., DeHaven, R.W. and Guarino, J.L. (1981) Mesurol as a bird repellent on wine grapes in Oregon and California. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 32, 150–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, C.E. and Wales, P.J. (1970) Liver esterases of Rhesus Monkey: inhibition and activation of selected pesticides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 18, 503–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineau, P. and Peakall, D.B. (1987) An evaluation of avian impact assessment techniques following broad-scale forest insecticide sprays. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 6, 781–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineau, P. and Collins, B.T. (1988) Avian mortality in agro-ecosystems. 2. Methods of detection. In Greaves, M.P., Smith, B.D. and Greig-Smith, P.W. eds Field Methods for the Study of Environmental Effects of Pesticides, pp. 12–27. Monograph No. 40. Croydon, UK: British Crop Protection Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, C.R. (1985) A Pasteur pipette mini-column technique for the clean-up of sample extracts in trace organic analysis. Lab. Practice, August 1985.

  • O'Connor, R.J. and Shrubb, M. (1986) Farming and Birds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, L. and Walker, C.H. (1989) Pesticide Effects on Terrestrial Wildlife. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C.P., Shake, W.F. and Langowski, D.J. (1974) Reducing bird damage to highbush blueberries with a carbamate repellent. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 2, 135–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R.W. (1985) The effect of scarers on the presence of Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in cherry orchards. Crop Protection 4, 520–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrant, K.A. (1988) Histological identification of the effects of pesticides on non-target species. In Greaves, M.P., Smith, B.D. and Greig-Smith, P.W. eds Field Methods for the Study of Environmental Effects of Pesticides, pp. 313–7. Monograph No. 40. Croydon, UK: British Crop Protection Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrant, K.A. and Westlke, G.E. (1988) Laboratory evaluation of the hazard to Wood Mice Apodemus sylvaticus, from the agricultural use of methiocarb molluscicide pellets. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 40, 147–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, H.M. (1991) Serum ‘B’ esterases as indicators of exposure to pesticides. In Mineau, P. ed. Cholinesterase-inhibiting Insecticides: Their Impact on Wildlife and the Environment, pp. 109–25. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, M.E. and Dolbeer, R.A. (1987) Status of mesurol as a bird repellent for cherries and for other fruit crops. Proceedings for the 3rd Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference, pp. 149–58.

  • Twigg, G.I. (1975) Catching mammals. Mammal Rev. 5, 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D.J. (1990) The use of terrestrial field data in the practical application of ecological risk assessment principles. In Somerville, L. and Walker, C.H. eds Pesticide Effects on Terrestrial Wildlife, pp. 319–33. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake, G.E., Blunden, C.A., Brown, P.M., Bunyan, P.J., Martin, A.D., Sayers, P.E., Stanley, P.I. and Tarrant, K.A. (1980) Residues and effects in mice after drilling wheat treated with chlorfenvinphos and an organomercurial fungicide. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 4, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake, G.E., Bunyan, P.J., Martin, A.D., Stanley, P.I. and Steed, L.C. (1981) Carbamate poisoning. Effects of selected carbamate pesticides on plasma enzymes and brain esterases of Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). J. Agric. Food Chem. 29, 779–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteoak, R.J., Reary, J.B. and Overton, K.C. (1978) ‘Bendiocarb’. In Zweig, G. and Sherma, J., eds Analytical Methods for Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators, Vol. X, New and Updated Methods, pp. 10–7. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E.N., Inglis, I.R. and Feare, C.J. (1980) Bird Problems in Agriculture. Croydon, UK: British Crop Protection Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinkl, J.G., Henny, C.H. and Shea, P.J. (1979) Brain cholinesterase activities of passerine birds in forests sprayed with cholinesterase inhibiting insecticides. In Animals as Monitors of Environmental Pollution: Proceedings of a Symposium on Pathobiology of Environmental Pollutants 1977, pp. 356–65. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hardy, A.R., Westlake, G.E., Lloyd, G.A. et al. An intensive field trial to assess hazards to birds and mammals from the use of methiocarb as a bird repellent on ripening cherries. Ecotoxicology 2, 1–31 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058211

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058211

Keywords

Navigation