Skip to main content
Log in

The Stability of Self-Organized Rule-Following Work Teams

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-organized rule-following systems are increasingly relevant objects of study in organization theory due to such systems&2018; capacity to maintain control while enabling decentralization of authority. This paper proposes a network model for such systems and examines the stability of the networks&2018; repetitive behavior. The networks examined are Ashby nets, a fundamental class of binary systems: connected aggregates of nodes that individually compute an interaction rule, a binary function of their three inputs. The nodes, which we interpret as workers in a work team, have two network inputs and one self-input. All workers in a given team follow the same interaction rule.

We operationalize the notion of stability of the team&2018;s work routine and determine stability under small perturbations for all possible rules these teams can follow. To study the organizational concomitants of stability, we characterize the rules by their memory, fluency, homogeneity, and autonomy. We relate these measures to work routine stability, and find that stability in ten member teams is enhanced by rules that have low memory, high homogeneity, and low autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benjaafar, S. (1994), “Models for Performance Evaluation of Flexibility in Manufacturing Systems,” International J. of Production Research, 32(3), 1383–1402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and I. Stewart (1995), The Collapse of Chaos. Penguin Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, K. (1995), Personal communication.

  • Dooley, K. (1997), “A Complex Adaptive Systems Model of Organizational Change,” Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and the Life Sciences, 1(1), 69–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson, W. (1994), “Manufacturing Systems Optimization and Control: Adaptation and Innovation Through Artificial Life,” in Proceedings of the Chaos Network Conference, Denver.

  • Gelfand, A.E. and C.C. Walker (1984), Ensemble Modeling. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. (1995), Hidden Order. Addison-Wesley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, B.A. and T. Hogg (1995), “Communities of Practice: Performance and Evolution,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1, 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, L.P. and S. Wolfram (1986), “Table 1: Rule Forms and Equivalences,” in S. Wolfram (Ed.) Theory and Application of Cellular Automata, World Scientific Pub. Co., Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennergren, L.P. (1981), “Decentralization in Organizations,” in P. Nystrom and W. Starbuck (Eds.) Handbook of Organizational Design, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S.A. (1969), “Metabolic Stability and Epigenesis in Randomly Constructed Genetic Nets,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 22, 437–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S.A. (1993), The Origins of Order. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S.A. (1995), At Home in the Universe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. (1992), “Life at the Edge of Chaos,” in C. Langton, C. Taylor, J. Farmer, and S. Rasmussen (Eds.) Artificial Life II, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. and S. Mohrman (1985), “Quality Circles after the Fad,” Harvard Business Review, 63(1), 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, G.Y. and J.J. Solberg (1992), “Integrated Shop Floor Control Using Autonomous Agents,” IIE Transactions, 24, 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. (1994), A Primer on Decision Making. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCMS Newsletter, September 1994, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

  • Prigogine, I. and I. Stengers (1984), Order Out of Chaos. Bantam Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safizadeh, M. (1991), “The Case of Workgroups in Manufacturing Operations,” California Management Review, 33(4), 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1957), Administrative Behavior. MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. (1997), “New Forms of Work Organization,” Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taplin, I. (1995), “Flexible Production, Rigid Jobs: Lessons from the Clothing Industry,” Work Occupations, 22(4), 412–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M. and G. Graen (1998), “Individual Self-Management: Self-Managing Activities in Function and Cross-Functional Work Teams,” Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 340–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, D. (1992), “AFlexible Structure for Computer-Controlled Manufacturing Systems,” Manufacturing Review, 5(1), 58–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C.C. (1971), “Behavior of a Class of Complex Systems: The Effect of System Size on Terminal Cycles,” Journal of Cybernetics, 1, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C.C. (1987), “Stability of Equilibrial States and Limit Cycles in Sparsely Connected, Structurally Complex Boolean Nets,” Complex Systems, 1, 1063–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C.C. (1990), “Attractor Dominance Patterns in Sparsely Connected Boolean Nets,” Physica D, 45, 441–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C.C. and A.A. Aadryan (1971), “Amount of Computation Preceding Externally Detectable Steady-State Behavior in a Class of Complex Systems,” Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 2, 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C.C. and W.R. Ashby (1966), “On Temporal Characteristics of Behavior in Certain Complex Systems,” Kybernetik, 3, 100–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C.C. and S.G. Motwani (1994), “Towards Inherently Useful Theory, a Management Example,” Kybernetes, 23, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S. (1983), “Statistical Mechanics of Cellular Automata,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 55, 601–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S. (1986), “Approaches to Complexity Engineering,” Physica D, 22, 385–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuensche, A. (1992), The Global Dynamics of Cellular Automata. Addison-Wesley, Reading.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, C.C., Dooley, K.J. The Stability of Self-Organized Rule-Following Work Teams. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 5, 5–30 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009689326098

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009689326098

Navigation