Skip to main content
Log in

Developmental Isolation and Subsequent Adult Behavior of Drosophila paulistorum.IV. Courtship

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early social experiences play important roles in adult Drosophila paulistorummate selection. Differences in courtship between control males and wholly socially isolated males were observed in chambers. Socially isolated males displayed more courtship toward virgin females than did controls. Socially isolated males were more successful in competing for mates. Yet socially isolated males from all six semispecies also displayed notable frequencies of homosexual behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bastock, M., and Manning, A. (1955). The courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour 8:85-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burla, H., Da Cunha, A. B., Cordeiro, A. R., Dobzhansky, Th., Malogolowkin, C., and Pavan, C. (1949). The willistonigroup of sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 3:300-314.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, M., Connolly, K., and Burnet, B. (1985). Courtship behavior in the melanogasterspecies subgroup of Drosophila. Behaviour 95:203-231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., and Spassky, B. (1959). Drosophila paulistorum, a cluster of species in status nascendi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 45:419-428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th., Ehrman, L., Pavlovsky, O., and Spassky, B. (1964). The superspecies Drosophila paulistorum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 51:3-9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1965). Direct observation of sexual isolation between allopatric and sympatric strains of the different Drosophila paulistorumraces. Evolution 19:459-464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., and Kim, Y.-K. (1995). Influence of developmental isolation on Drosophila paulistorumrare male mating advantages. Dros. Info. Serv. 76:125-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., and Kim, Y.-K. (1997). Courtship. In Greenberg, G., and Haraway, M. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Comparative Psychology, Garland, New York, pp. 1469-1497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., and Powell, J. R. (1982). The Drosophila willistonispecies group. In Ashburner, M., Carson, H. L., and Thompson, J. M., Jr. (eds.), The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3b, Academic Press, New York, pp. 193-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L., Somerson, N., and Gottlieb, F. J. (1986). Reproductive isolation in a neotropical insect: Behavior and microbiology. In Huettel, M. (ed.), Evolutionary Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior: Progress and Prospects, Plenum, New York, pp. 97-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einon, D., and Morgan, M. (1976). Habituation of object contact in socially-reared and isolated rats (Rattus norvegicus). Anim. Behav. 24:415-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. B., and Kessler, S. (1975). Differential posteclosion housing experiences and reproduction in Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 23:949-952.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groothuis, T., and Mulekom, L. V. (1991). The influence of social experience on the ontogenetic change in the relation between aggression, fear and display behavior in black-headed gulls. Anim. Behav. 42:873-881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, H. F., and Harlow, M. K. (1969). Effects of various mother-infant relationships on rhesus monkey behaviors. In Foss, B. (ed.), Determinants of Infant Behavior, Vol. 4, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, M., Heusipp, M., and Wanke, C. (1995). Structural plasticity in the Drosophilabrain. J. Neurosci. 15(3):1951-1960.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoikkala, A., and Aspi, J. (1993). Criteria of female mate choice in Drosophila littoralis, Drosophila montana, and Drosophila ezoana. Evolution 47:768-777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-K., Ehrman, L., and Koepfer, H. R. (1992). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. I. Survey of the six semispecies. Behav. Genet. 22:545-556.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-K., Ehrman, L., and Koepfer, H. R. (1996a). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. II. Prior experience. Behav. Genet. 26:15-25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-K., Koepfer, H. R., and Ehrman, L. (1996b). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. III. Alternative rearing. Behav. Genet. 26:27-37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koref-Santibañez, S. (1972a). Courtship behavior in the semispecies of the superspecies Drosophila paulistorum. Evolution 26:108-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koref-Santibañez, S. (1972b). Courtship interaction in the semispecies of Drosophila paulistorum. Evolution 26:326-333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruijt, J. P. (1971). Early experience and the development of social behavior in junglefowl. Psychiat. Neurol. Neurochir. 74:7-20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1956). Fertility, mating behavior and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. J. Genet. 54:261-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H. E. H. (1985). The recognition concept of species. In Vrba, E. S. (ed.), Species and Speciation, Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, pp. 21-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, C., and Ehrman, L. (1969). Sexual selection in Drosophila. In Dobzhansky, Th., Hecht, M. K., and Steere, W. C. (eds.), Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 3, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 177-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W., and Reeve, E. (1952). Studies in quantitative inheritance. I. The effects of selection on wing and thorax length in D. melanogaster. J. Genet. 50:414-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1991). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6.03, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sene, F. (1977). Effect of social isolation on behavior of Drosophila silvestrisfrom Hawaii. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 22:469-474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerson, N., Ehrman, L., and Kocka, J. (1984a). Induction by streptococcal L-forms of two reproductive isolating mechanisms in Drosophila paulistorum. Israeli J. Med. Sci. 20:1009-1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerson, N., Ehrman, L., Kocka, J., and Gottlieb, F. L. (1984b). Streptococcal L-forms isolated from Drosophila paulistorumsemispecies cause sterility in male progeny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:282-285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, E. B. (1987). Discrimination among prospective mates in Drosophila. In Fletcher, D. J. C., and Michener, C. D. (eds.), Kin Recognition in Animals, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 75-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T. (1968). Evolutionary implications of sexual behavior in Drosophila. Evol. Biol. 2:157-193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, YK., Ehrman, L. Developmental Isolation and Subsequent Adult Behavior of Drosophila paulistorum.IV. Courtship. Behav Genet 28, 57–65 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021460832378

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021460832378

Navigation