Abstract
Early social experiences play important roles in adult Drosophila paulistorummate selection. Differences in courtship between control males and wholly socially isolated males were observed in chambers. Socially isolated males displayed more courtship toward virgin females than did controls. Socially isolated males were more successful in competing for mates. Yet socially isolated males from all six semispecies also displayed notable frequencies of homosexual behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bastock, M., and Manning, A. (1955). The courtship of Drosophila melanogaster. Behaviour 8:85-112.
Burla, H., Da Cunha, A. B., Cordeiro, A. R., Dobzhansky, Th., Malogolowkin, C., and Pavan, C. (1949). The willistonigroup of sibling species of Drosophila. Evolution 3:300-314.
Cobb, M., Connolly, K., and Burnet, B. (1985). Courtship behavior in the melanogasterspecies subgroup of Drosophila. Behaviour 95:203-231.
Dobzhansky, Th., and Spassky, B. (1959). Drosophila paulistorum, a cluster of species in status nascendi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 45:419-428.
Dobzhansky, Th., Ehrman, L., Pavlovsky, O., and Spassky, B. (1964). The superspecies Drosophila paulistorum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 51:3-9.
Ehrman, L. (1965). Direct observation of sexual isolation between allopatric and sympatric strains of the different Drosophila paulistorumraces. Evolution 19:459-464.
Ehrman, L., and Kim, Y.-K. (1995). Influence of developmental isolation on Drosophila paulistorumrare male mating advantages. Dros. Info. Serv. 76:125-126.
Ehrman, L., and Kim, Y.-K. (1997). Courtship. In Greenberg, G., and Haraway, M. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Comparative Psychology, Garland, New York, pp. 1469-1497.
Ehrman, L., and Powell, J. R. (1982). The Drosophila willistonispecies group. In Ashburner, M., Carson, H. L., and Thompson, J. M., Jr. (eds.), The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3b, Academic Press, New York, pp. 193-225.
Ehrman, L., Somerson, N., and Gottlieb, F. J. (1986). Reproductive isolation in a neotropical insect: Behavior and microbiology. In Huettel, M. (ed.), Evolutionary Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior: Progress and Prospects, Plenum, New York, pp. 97-108.
Einon, D., and Morgan, M. (1976). Habituation of object contact in socially-reared and isolated rats (Rattus norvegicus). Anim. Behav. 24:415-420.
Ellis, L. B., and Kessler, S. (1975). Differential posteclosion housing experiences and reproduction in Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 23:949-952.
Groothuis, T., and Mulekom, L. V. (1991). The influence of social experience on the ontogenetic change in the relation between aggression, fear and display behavior in black-headed gulls. Anim. Behav. 42:873-881.
Harlow, H. F., and Harlow, M. K. (1969). Effects of various mother-infant relationships on rhesus monkey behaviors. In Foss, B. (ed.), Determinants of Infant Behavior, Vol. 4, Methuen, London.
Heisenberg, M., Heusipp, M., and Wanke, C. (1995). Structural plasticity in the Drosophilabrain. J. Neurosci. 15(3):1951-1960.
Hoikkala, A., and Aspi, J. (1993). Criteria of female mate choice in Drosophila littoralis, Drosophila montana, and Drosophila ezoana. Evolution 47:768-777.
Kim, Y.-K., Ehrman, L., and Koepfer, H. R. (1992). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. I. Survey of the six semispecies. Behav. Genet. 22:545-556.
Kim, Y.-K., Ehrman, L., and Koepfer, H. R. (1996a). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. II. Prior experience. Behav. Genet. 26:15-25.
Kim, Y.-K., Koepfer, H. R., and Ehrman, L. (1996b). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. III. Alternative rearing. Behav. Genet. 26:27-37.
Koref-Santibañez, S. (1972a). Courtship behavior in the semispecies of the superspecies Drosophila paulistorum. Evolution 26:108-115.
Koref-Santibañez, S. (1972b). Courtship interaction in the semispecies of Drosophila paulistorum. Evolution 26:326-333.
Kruijt, J. P. (1971). Early experience and the development of social behavior in junglefowl. Psychiat. Neurol. Neurochir. 74:7-20.
Maynard Smith, J. (1956). Fertility, mating behavior and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. J. Genet. 54:261-279.
Paterson, H. E. H. (1985). The recognition concept of species. In Vrba, E. S. (ed.), Species and Speciation, Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, pp. 21-29.
Petit, C., and Ehrman, L. (1969). Sexual selection in Drosophila. In Dobzhansky, Th., Hecht, M. K., and Steere, W. C. (eds.), Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 3, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 177-217.
Robertson, F. W., and Reeve, E. (1952). Studies in quantitative inheritance. I. The effects of selection on wing and thorax length in D. melanogaster. J. Genet. 50:414-448.
SAS Institute Inc. (1991). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6.03, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Sene, F. (1977). Effect of social isolation on behavior of Drosophila silvestrisfrom Hawaii. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 22:469-474.
Somerson, N., Ehrman, L., and Kocka, J. (1984a). Induction by streptococcal L-forms of two reproductive isolating mechanisms in Drosophila paulistorum. Israeli J. Med. Sci. 20:1009-1012.
Somerson, N., Ehrman, L., Kocka, J., and Gottlieb, F. L. (1984b). Streptococcal L-forms isolated from Drosophila paulistorumsemispecies cause sterility in male progeny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:282-285.
Spiess, E. B. (1987). Discrimination among prospective mates in Drosophila. In Fletcher, D. J. C., and Michener, C. D. (eds.), Kin Recognition in Animals, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 75-119.
Spieth, H. T. (1968). Evolutionary implications of sexual behavior in Drosophila. Evol. Biol. 2:157-193.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, YK., Ehrman, L. Developmental Isolation and Subsequent Adult Behavior of Drosophila paulistorum.IV. Courtship. Behav Genet 28, 57–65 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021460832378
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021460832378