Skip to main content
Log in

A reexamination of the negative assortative mating phenomenon and its underlying mechanism inDrosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Averhoff and Richardson [(1974)Behav. Genet. 4:207–225] reported a trend toward negative assortative mating inDrosophila melanogaster during the course of inbreeding. These authors proposed that the underlying mechanism was based on pheromone polymorphism and male selection. Mass mating experiments were carried out to verify their hypothesis, detailed behavior observations were made to identify the underlying mechanism, and sex pheromone composition and variation were examined by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. The results showed that negative assortative mating is not a general phenomenon. Although male pheromones are probably polymorphic, female pheromones are not. We found no evidence for male selection as predicted by Averhoff and Richardson. It is argued that the most parsimonious mechanism underlying negative assortative mating is similar to one proposed by Bryant [(1979)Behav. Genet. 9:249–256], which was based on interstrain differences in female reluctancy and male vigor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antony, C., and Jallon, J. M. (1982). The chemical basis for sex recognition inDrosophila melanogaster.J. Insect Physiol. 28:873–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averhoff, W. W., and Richardson, R. H. (1974). Pheromonal control of mating patterns inDrosophila melanogaster, Behav. Genet. 4:207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, E. H. (1979). Inbreeding and heterogamic mating: An alternative to A and R.Behav. Genet. 9:249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijlsma, R., and Van Delden, W. (1977). Polymorphism at the G6PD and 6PGD loci inDrosophila melanogaster.Genet. Res. 30:221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1972). A factor influencing the rare-male advantage inDrosophila.Behav. Genet. 2:69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elens, A. A., and Wattiaux, J. M. (1964). Direct observation of sexual isolation.Dros. Inform. Serv. 39:118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kence, A., and Bryant, E. H. (1978). A model of mating behavior in flies.Am. Nat. 112:1047–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. (1974).The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. (1959). The sexual behaviour of two siblingDrosophila species.Behavior 15:123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, H. H., and Bartell, R. J. (1970). Role of a volatile sex pheromone in stimulating male courtship behaviour inDrosophila melanogaster.Anim. Behav. 18:159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, L., Hall, J. C., and Hall, L. M. (1980). Courtship-stimulating volatile compounds from normal and mutantDrosophila.J. Insect Physiol. 26:689–697.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van den Berg, M.J., Thomas, G., Hendriks, H. et al. A reexamination of the negative assortative mating phenomenon and its underlying mechanism inDrosophila melanogaster . Behav Genet 14, 45–61 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066068

Key Words

Navigation