Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of mesencephalic stimulation on responses to nociceptive stimulation of the dental pulp

  • Physiology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Chronic experiments on cats showed that stimulation of certain zones of the mesencephalon reduces or completely suppresses responses to pain caused by stimulation of the dental pulp. Depending on the parameters of brain stimulation the antinociceptive effect was manifested as differential changes in individual motor, autonomic, emotional, and behavioral components of the integral nociceptive response. After-analgesia was found and the dynamics of the return of the various manifestations of pain after cessation of brain stimulation was noted. The possible mechanisms of the antinociceptive effect are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. A. V. Val'dman, The Neoropharmacology of Narcotic Analgesics [in Russian], Leningrad (1972).

  2. Yu. N. Vasil'ev, “Effect of analgesics and narcotics on presynaptic inhibition of afferents of different modalities at the segmental level and at the level of the nucleus of the trigeminal nerve,” Author's Abstract of Candidate' Dissertation, Leningrad (1975).

  3. Yu. D. Ignatov, “The effect of analgesics and narcotics on the neuronal system of the segmental afferent input and its descending regulation”, Author's Abstract of Candidate's Dissertation, Leningrad (1975).

  4. Yu. D. Ignatov and Yu. N. Vasil'ev, Proceedings of the 12th All-Union Congress of the Academician I. P. Pavlov Physiological Society [in Russian], Vol. 1, Leningrad (1975), p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. M. Kozlovskaya and A. V. Val'dman, in: Current Problems in the Pharmacology of the Reticular Formation and Synaptic Transmission [in Russian], Leningrad (1963), pp. 116–164.

  6. H. Akil and D. J. Mayer, Brain Res.,44, 692 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Balagura and T. Ralph, Brain Res.,60, 369 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. M. Broockhart, W. K. Livingston, and F. P. Haugen, J. Neurophysiol.,16, 634 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. C. Liebeskind, G. Guilbaud, J. M. Besson, et al., Brain Res.,50, 441 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. J. Mayer and J. C. Liebeskind, Brain Res.,68, 73 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Melzack and D. R. Melinkoff, Exp. Neurol.,43, 369 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. L. Oliveras, A. Woda, G. Guilbaud, et al., C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris),276, 2705 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. V. Reynolds, Science164, 444 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. J. Scott and G. G. Stewart, Oral Surg.,20, 784 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. S. Snider and W. T. Niemer, A. Stereotaxic Atlas of the Cat Brain, Chicago (1961).

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ignatov, Y.D., Dmitriev, A.V. Effect of mesencephalic stimulation on responses to nociceptive stimulation of the dental pulp. Bull Exp Biol Med 82, 1445–1448 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00799772

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00799772

Key Words

Navigation