Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological distance between australopithecine, human and ape skulls

  • Published:
Human Evolution

Abstract

This paper attempts to quantify the morphological difference between fossil and living species of hominoids. The comparison is based upon a balanced list of craniodental characters corrected for size (Wood & Chamberlain, 1986). The conclusions are: craniodentally the australopithecine species are a unique and rather uniform group, much nearer to the great apes than to humans; overall, their skull and dentition do not resemble the human more than the chimpanzee’s do.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bown T.M., Holroyd P.A. and Rose K.D., 1994. Mammal extinctions, body size, and paleotemperature.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 91: 10403–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Brul, E.L., 1977. Early hominid feeding mechanisms.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 47: 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelstein S.J., 1987. An alternative paradigm for hominoid evolution.Human Evolution, 2: 169–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson W.W., 1989. A new species of the genusAustralopithecus Primates-Hominidae from the Plio/ Pleistocene deposits West of Lake Turkana in Kenya.Primates, 30: 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, H.L. and Grant P.R., 1987. Oscillating selection on Darwin’s finches.Nature, 327: 511–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman M., 1982. Biomolecular evidence on human origins from the standpoint of Darwinian theory.Human Biology, 54: 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribbin J. and Cherfas J., 1983.The Monkey Puzzle. London: Triad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa M., Kishino H. and Yano T., 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.Journal of Molecular Evolution, 2: 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horai S., Hayasaka K., Kondo R., Tsugane K. and Takahata N., 1995. Recent African origin of modern humans revealed by complete sequences of hominoid mitochondrial DNAs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92: 532–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleindienst M.R., 1975. On new perspectives on ape and human evolution.Current Anthropology, 16: 644–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxnard C.E., 1984.The Order of Man. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puech P.-F., 1992. Microwear studies of early African hominid teeth.Scanning Microscopy, 6: 1083–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seger J., 1987. El Niño and Darwin’s finches.Nature, 327: 461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silson R.G., 1988.Additive Genes in Evolution and Selection. Tring: Greenfield Pubblications

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhaegen M., 1990. African ape ancestry.Human Evolution, 5: 295–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhaegen M., 1992. Did robust australopithecines partly feed on hard parts of Gramineae?Human Evolution, 7: 63–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhaegen M., 1993. Aquaticversus savanna: comparative and paleo-environmental evidence.Nutrition and Health, 9: 165–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhaegen M., 1994. Australopithecines: ancestors of the African apes?Human Evolution, 9: 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White T.D. and Harris J.M., 1977. Suid evolution and correlation of African hominid localities.Science, 198: 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood B.A. and Chamberlain A.T., 1986.Australopithecus: grade or clade? In (B.A. Wood, L. Martin and P. Andrews, eds).Major Topics in Primate and Human Evolution, pp. 220–248, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verhaegen, M. Morphological distance between australopithecine, human and ape skulls. Hum. Evol. 11, 35–41 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02456987

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02456987

Key Words

Navigation