Skip to main content
Log in

Factors that effect leaf regeneration efficiency in apple, and effect of antibiotics in morphogenesis

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several factors that affect the frequency of organogenesis in apple leaf explants were examined for the scion cultivars ‘Empire’, ‘Freedom’, ‘Golden Delicious’, ‘Liberty’, ‘McIntosh’, and ‘Mutsu’ and for the rootstocks Malling 7A and Malling 26. The main factors affecting morphogenesis were BA concentration, basal medium, leaf explant origin and maturity, explant orientation, and photosynthetic photon flux. Depending on the genotype, optimal regeneration was obtained using either 22.2 or 31.1 μM BA and the N6 basal medium, with the exception of ‘Golden Delicious’ which regenerated better on MS medium. After 6 weeks, the average number of shoots per segment varied from 5 to 16, and the percentage of regeneration between 70 and 100%, depending on the genotype tested and the maturity of the explant. Regeneration capacity increased dramatically from the tip towards the base of the leaf, and was higher from the middle to the proximal end.

Cefotaxime and carbenicillin, two antibiotics commonly used during transformation studies to eliminate Agrobacterium tumefaciens from plant tissue, were tested to determine their effect on morphogenesis. Cefotaxime at a dose of 250 mg 1-1 enhanced regeneration and shoot development, whereas carbenicillin at a dose of 500 mg l-1 induced abundant callus formation and inhibited regeneration. Kanamycin, a widely used selection agent for plant transformation, strongly inhibited regeneration even at very low doses. Schemes for selection and recovery of transgenic apple plants when kanamycin is used as the selection agent are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BA:

benzyladenine

Cef:

cefotaxime

Crb:

carbenicillin

IBA:

indolebutyric acid

Kan:

kanamycin

LS:

Linsmaier and Skoog (1965) medium

M:

Malling

MS:

Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium

NAA:

naphthaleneacetic acid

N6 medium (Chu et al. 1975):

as modified by Welander (1988)

PPF:

photosynthetic photon flux

References

  • Barbieri C & Morini S (1987) In vitro regeneration from somatic tissues and seed explants of apple. Adv. Hort. Sci. 1: 8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Blancke MM & Belcher AR (1989) Stomata of apple leaves cultured in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 19: 85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu CC, Wang CC, Sung CS, Hsü C, Yin KC, Chu CY & Bi FY (1975) Establishment of an efficient medium for anther culture of rice through comparative experiments on the nitrogen sources. Scientia Sin. 18: 659–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandekar AM (1992) Transformation. In: Hammerschlag FA & Litz RE (Eds) Biotechnology of Perennial Fruit Crops (pp 141–168). C.A.B International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour M (1988) Callogénèse et organogénèse in vitro chez des variétés greffons de pommier cultivé (Malus x domestica Borkh.) et des variétés porte-greffes (Malus spp.). PhD thesis, Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, Montpellier, France (p 193)

  • Dufour M (1990) Improving yield of adventitious shoots in apple. Acta Hort. 280: 51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasolo F, Zimmerman RH & Fordham I (1989) Adventitious shoot formation on excised leaves of in vitro grown shoots of apple cultivars. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 16: 75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiola JA, Hassan MA, Swartz HJ, Bors RH & McNicols R (1990) Effect of thidiazuron, light influence rates and kanamycin on in vitro shoot organogenesis from excised Rubus cotyledons and leaves. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 20: 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray DJ & Meredith CP (1992) Grape. In: Hammerschlag FA & Litz RE (Eds) Biotechnology of Perennial Fruit Crops (pp 229–262). C.A.B International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • James DJ & Dandekar AM (1991) Regeneration and transformation of apple Malus pumila Mill.). In: Lindsey K (Ed) Plant Tissue Culture Manual (pp B8: 1–18). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • James DJ, Passey AJ & Malhotra SB (1984) Organogenesis in callus derived from stem and leaf tissues of apple and cherry rootstocks. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 3: 333–341

    Google Scholar 

  • James DJ, Passey AJ & Rugini E (1988) Factors affecting high frequency plant regeneration from apple leaf tissues cultured in vitro. J. Plant Physiol. 132: 148–154

    Google Scholar 

  • James DJ, Passey AJ, Barbara DJ & Bevan M (1989) Genetic transformation of apple (Malus pumila Mill.) using a disarmed Tibinary vector. Plant Cell Rep. 7: 658–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Klee HJ & Rogers SG (1989) Plant genetic vectors and transformation: plant transformation systems based on the use of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. In: Schell J & Vasil IK (Eds) Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol 6, Molecular Biology of Plant Nuclear Genes (pp 2–25). Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Korban SS, O'Connor PA & Elobeidy A (1992) Effect of thidiazuron, naphthalene acetic acid, dark incubation and genotype on shoot organogenesis of Malus leaves. J. Hort. Sci. 67: 341–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsmaier EM & Skoog F (1965) Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 18: 100–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Litz RE & Gray DJ (1992) Organogenesis and somatic embryogements. In: Hammerschlag FA & Litz RE (Eds) Biotechnology of Perennial Fruit Crops (pp 3–34). C.A.B International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JR, Sink KC & Dennis FGJr (1983a) Adventive embryogenesis from leaf explants of apple seedlings. HortScience 18: 871–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JR, Sink KC & Dennis FG (1983b) Plant regeneration from apple seedling explants and callus cultures, Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 2: 293–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZR (1987) Regeneration and genetic transformation of apple and strawberry. MS Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (p 106)

  • Mathias RJ & Boyd LA (1986) Cefotaxime stimulates callus growth, embryogenesis and regeneration in hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. EM. Thell). Plant Sci. 46: 217–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Norelli JL & Aldwinckle HS (1993) The role of aminoglycoside antibiotics in the regeneration and selection of neomycin phosphotransferase-transgenic apple tissue. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 118: 311–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens LD (1979) Kanamycin promotes morphogenesis of plant tissues. Plant Sci. Lett. 16: 225–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson KE (1983) Polarity of regeneration in excised leaves of Crassula argenta. I. A role of auxin. Can. J. Bot. 61: 1058–1063

    Google Scholar 

  • Pius J, George G, Eapen S & Rao PS (1993) Enhanced plant regeneration in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum) by ethylene inhibitors and cefotaxime. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 32: 91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Predieri S & Fasolo Fabbri Malavasi F (1989) High-frequency shoot regeneration from leaves of the apple rootstock M26 (Malus pumila Mill.). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 17: 133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Predieri S, Fasolo Fabbri Malavasi F, Passey AJ & James DJ (1989) Regeneration from in vitro leaves of the pear cultivar Conference (Pyrus communis L.). J. Hort. Sci. 64: 553–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford JC, Smith FD & Russell JA (1993) Optimizing the biolistic process for different biological applications. In: Wu R (Ed) Methods in Enzymology, Vol 217 (pp 483–509), Academic Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriskandarajah S, Skirvin RM, Abu-Qaoud H & Korban SS (1990) Factors involved in shoot elongation and growth of adventitious and axillary shoots of three apple scion cultivars. J. Hort. Sci. 65: 113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz HJ, Bors R, Mohamed F & Naess SK (1990) The effect of in vitro pretreatments on subsequent shoot organogenesis from excised Rubus and Malus leaves. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 21: 179–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Welander M (1988) Plant regeneration from leaf and stem segments of shoots raised in vitro from mature apple trees. J. Plant Physiol, 132: 738–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Welander M & Maheswaran G (1992) Shoot regeneration from leaf explants of dwarfing apple rootstocks. J. Plant Physiol. 140: 223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Yepes-Martínez LM (1990) Genetic transformation of apple and techniques for in vitro selection of regenerants resistant to Venturia inae qualis. PhD Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (p 277)

  • Yepes LM & Aldwinckle HS (1994) Micropropagation of thirteen Malus cultivars and rootstocks, and effect of antibiotics on proliferation. Plant Growth Regulation 15: 55–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman R H (1983) Factors affecting in vitro propagation of apple cultivars. Acta Hort. 131: 171–178

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yepes, L.M., Aldwinekle, H.S. Factors that effect leaf regeneration efficiency in apple, and effect of antibiotics in morphogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 37, 257–269 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042339

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042339

Key words

Navigation