Skip to main content
Log in

Citedness and uncitedness of cancer articles

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a rapid growth of cancer literature. Thousands of papers are being regularly published every year not only in speciality journals, but also in journals of other disciplines. Citation studies are nowadays considered a major basis of science indicators for ascertaining the importance of a scientific journal and that of the published articles on a particular subject. In oncological research the journalCancer is considered as one of the top most journals and is universally well known for its high standard and excellence. In this paper an attempt has been made to find out the importance of all the articles published in it for a particular year. Side by side bibliometric analysis was made to ascertain various other aspects like time lag between publication and first citation of articles, average citation time, subject scattering and identification of most important journals in the field etc. It is believed that this study would be of help to the working oncologists, librarians and information scientists to assess the importance of articles published in a top ranking journal of cancer and also that of different journals publishing oncological research results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Sandor, R.P. Kraft, G. Wagner, R.G. Henzler, M. Wolff-Terroine, Analysis of the structure of cancer literature based on SABIR-C.Zeitschrift für Krebsforschung, 86 (1976) 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Wagner, Die Bedeutung moderner Informationsystem für die Wissenschaft,Medizinische Welt, 26 (1975) 1069–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Wolff-Terroine, Data processing in oncology: Attempts at mechanisation and automation, Methods of Information in Medicine, 5 (1966) 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Stoker, Limits to oncology,Nature, Lond., 254 (1975) 547–548.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I.N. Sengupta, R. Bose, S. Mukhopadhyay, B. Ghosh, Bibliometric evaluation of cancer literature on experimental cytology, IASLIC Spl. Publ 15 (1985) 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Ghosh, M.L. Neufeld, Uncitedness of articles in the Journal of the American Chemical Society,Information Storege and Retrieval, 10 (1974) 365–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Ghosh, Uncitedness of articles in Nature, a multidisciplinary journal,Information Storage and Retrieval, 11 (1975) 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.M. Kessler, F.E. Heart, Concerning the probability that a given paper will be cited. M.I.F., Cambridge (TIP-TM-005), 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I.N. Sengupta, Growth of biochemical literature.Nature, Lond. 244 (5411), (1973) 75–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sengupta, I.N., Henzler, R.G. Citedness and uncitedness of cancer articles. Scientometrics 22, 283–296 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020002

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02020002

Keywords

Navigation