Abstract
Ranking of scientific periodicals by the method of citation counting provides valueable information about the degree of importance of the ranked periodicals. But such lists suffer from some inherent limitations. This paper discusses various pitfalls of traditional ranking lists and suggests, as a remedial measure, three new bibliometric parameters, namely, (1) scientific interest of a journal in relation to total number of articles published; (2) compactness of information content in a scientific periodical; and (3) scientific value of the papers in relation to compactness of presentation. It is believed that these new parameters, whenever applied to any traditional ranking list, will help to identify the accurate positions of different scientific journals of the parent list in order of their usefulness and importance. As a case study these parameters have been applied to the first ten core journals of biochemistry identified earlier and a revised reranked order of the titles presented and discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. PRITCHARD, Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?Journal of Documentation, 25 (1969) 348.
E. W. HULME,Statistical bibliography in relation to the growth of modern civilization. Grafton, London, 1923, p. 44.
E. J. COLE, N. Y. EALES, The history of comparative anatomy. A statistical analysis of the literature,Science Progress, 11 (1917) 578.
P. L. K. GROSS, E. M. GROSS, College libraries and chemical education,Science, N. Y., 66 (1927) 385.
E. S. ALLAN, Periodicals for mathematics,Science, N. Y., 70 (1929) 592.
J. K. McNEELY C. D. CROSNO, Publications for electrical engineers,Science, N. Y., 72 (1930) 81.
P. L. K. GROSS, A. C. WOODFORD, Serial literature used by American geologists,Science, N. Y., 73 (1931) 660.
R. JENKINS, Periodicals for medical libraries,American Medical Association Journal, 97 (1931) 608.
R. H. HOOKER, A study of scientific periodicalsReview of Scientific Instruments, 6 (1935) 333.
J. GREGORY, An evaluation of medical periodicals,Medical Library Association Bulletin 25 (1937) 172.
H. N. HENKLE, The periodical literature of biochemistry,Medical Library Association Bulletin, 27 (1938) 139.
E. BRODMAN, Choosing physiology journals,Medical Library Association Bulletin, 32 (1944) 479.
F. B. JENKINS, The acquisition of scientific and technical material,Library Trends, 3 (1955) 414.
J. E. LANCASTER, Evaluation of scientific and technical periodicals,Ass. Spl. Libr. Infn. Bureaux, Rep. Proc. 15 (1955) 72.
R. W. ORR, A new aspect of acquiring serials.Library Trends, 3 (1955) 393.
C. H. BROWN,Scientific Serials: Characteristics and List of Most Cited Publications in Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, Geology, Physiology, Botany, Zoology and Entomology. Association of college and Reference Libraries, Chicago, Monograph No. 16, pp. 1–15, 1956. USA.
I. N. SENGUPTA, Ranking of periodicals in the field of medical sciences from the Indian Scientists', point of view: Analysis of data for 1954–1958,IASLIC Bulletin, 15 (1970) 120–144.
I. N. SENGUPTA, Ranking of periodicals in the field of biomedical sciences from the Indian Scientists' point of view: Analysis of data for 1959–1968,UNESCO Bulletin for Libraries, 24 (1970) 143–152.
I. N. SENGUPTA, Impact of scientific serials on the advancement of medical knowledge: An objective method of analysis,International Library Review, 4 (1972) 169.
I. N. SENGUPTA, Identification of periodicals for the Third World Countries. Part II: Core periodicals in the field of biochemistry,International Library Review, (accepted for publication).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sengupta, I.N. Three new parameters in bibliometric research and their application to rerank periodicals in the field of biochemistry. Scientometrics 10, 235–242 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016772
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016772