Skip to main content
Log in

Growth, the external terms of trade and endogenous trade liberalization

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the effects of growth and changes in the external terms of trade on protection. There are two sectors, an urban sector and a rural sector, and trade policy is used to redistribute income between them. We show that growth precedes trade liberalization. In addition, we find that trade reform is triggered by falls in the world prices of primary exports or intermediate imports. These results are shown to hold for tariffs and quotas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, K. and Hayami, Y. (Eds.) (1986). The political economy of agricultural protection: East Asia in international perspective. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, D. and Whinston, M. (1986). Menu auctions, resource allocation and economic influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 101: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. (1973). The theory of immiserizing growth: Further applications. InM. Connolly and A. Swoboda (Eds), International trade and money. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. (1988). Export promoting strategies: Issues and evidence. World Bank Research Observer 3: 27–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassing J. and Hillman, A. (1985). Political influence motives and the choice between tariffs and quotas. Journal of International Economics 19: 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassing, J., Hillman, A. and Long, N. (1986). Risk aversion, terms of trade uncertainty and social consensus trade policy. Oxford Economic Papers 38: 234–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W.M. (1974). Trade policy and economic welfare. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougan, W. (1981). The political economy of protection. Ph.D dissertation, Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, M. (1992). Growth, specialization and trade liberalization. Unpublished, Vancouver.

  • Eaton, J. and Grossman, G.M. (1985). Tariffs as insurance: Optimal commercial policy when domestic markets are incomplete. Canadian Journal of Economics 18: 258–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. (1992). Trade orientation, distortions and growth in developing economies. Journal of Developing Economics 39: 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, G.W. and Kimbrough, K. (1992). Tax regimes, tariff revenues and government spending. Economica 59: 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1994). Protection for sale. American Economic Review 84: 833–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E and Grossman, G. (1991). Innovation and growth in the world economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. and Webb, S. (1993). What do we know about the political economy of economic policy reform. World Bank Research Observer 8: 143–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. (1982). Declining industries and political-support protectionist motives. American Economic Review 72: 1180–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. (1988). Tariff-revenue transfers to protectionists interests. Public Choice 58: 169–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. (1989).The political economy of protection. London: Harwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. (1976). Comment on Peltzman. Journal of Law and Economics 19: 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. (1967). The possibility of income losses from increased efficiency or factor accumulation in the presence of tariffs. The Economic Journal76: 151–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, W.S and Marshall, P.J. (1985). Exports growth and causality in developing economies. Journal of Development Economics 18: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight,M. Loayza, N. and Villanueva, D. (1993). Testing the neoclassical theory of economic growth. IMF Staff Papers 40: 512–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1988). The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs Thatcher: Notes on trade in the presence of dynamic scale economies. Journal of Development Economics 27: 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1993). Regionalism versus multilateralism: Analytical notes. In J. De Melo and A. Panagariya (Eds), New dimensions in regional integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N and Vousden, N. (1991). Protectionist responses and declining industries. Journal of International Economics 30: 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, S.P., Brock, W. and Young, L. (1989). Black hole tariffs and endogenous policy theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, W. (1984). Endogenous tariff formation. American Economic Review 74: 970–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Towards a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19: 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1989). The economic theory of regulation after a decade of deregulation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics: 1–41.

  • Rodrik, D. (1994). What does the political economy literature on trade policy (not) tell us that we ought to know. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 4870, September.

  • Sah, R.K. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1984). The economics of the price scissors. The American Economic Review 74: 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, R. and Tabellini, G. (1987). Discretionary trade policy and excessive protection. American Economic Review 77: 823–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeny, R. Tower, E. and Willett, T.D. (1977). The ranking of alternative tariff and quota policies in the presence of domestic monopoly. Journal of International Economics 7: 349–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trela, I. and Whalley, J. (1992). The role of tax policy in Korea's economic growth. In T. Ito and A. Krueger (Eds.), The political economy of tax reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyers, R. and Anderson, K. (1992). Dis-array in world food markets: A quantitative assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD, (1990). Handbook of international trade and development statistics. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1993). World development report. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Devereux, J., Chen, L.L. Growth, the external terms of trade and endogenous trade liberalization. Public Choice 98, 43–57 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026420915038

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026420915038

Keywords

Navigation