Skip to main content
Log in

Philantropic motives and contribution policy: A note

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This note analyzes the results of Ben-Zion and Spiegel regarding different forms of transfer from rich persons to poor ones. Assuming a more general utility function, not necessarily additive or homothetic, this note shows that a combined policy of income transfer with specific subsidy to the poor consumer can lead to an optimal solution (first best) from the donor's point of view. If it is not possible to differentiate between consumers, a system of subsidy to all consumers can achieve a second best solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Zion, U., and Spiegel, U. (1983). Philantropic motives and contribution policy. Public Choice 40(2): 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F.M. (1977). On donor sovereignty and united charities. The American Economic Review 67(April): 632–638.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This essay was written during my visit at the University of Pennsylvania.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deutsch, J. Philantropic motives and contribution policy: A note. Public Choice 44, 501–505 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119696

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119696

Keywords

Navigation