Skip to main content
Log in

Foreign investors' activities in the context of East German privatisation: Motivations and strategies

  • Foreign Investment
  • Published:
MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies

4. Conclusions

Privatisation in East Germany has not been a closed-shop event but has successfully set the stage for international integration of the East German economy. The degree of foreign participation, though fairly modest in the beginning, has risen considerably over the course of time. Foreign investors, who have proved to be sensitive both to market signals and to policy created incentives, will contribute a good deal to restructuring and modernising the East German economy. However, the importance of foreigners' participation has to be assessed in qualitative terms. Its main merit in privatisation has been to strengthen competition. In many cases, bidding among potential investors became more competitive when the Treuhand Agency succeeded in inviting foreigners to participate. However, investors' competition has been low in cases where maintaining old production sites was politically pre-determined. Political decisions to maintain production were motivated mainly by the need to secure employment. This policy has had a high cost which it has not been possible to shift to foreign investors — or to Germans — but which has had to be covered by the Treuhand Agency and other public bodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brander S., Hilpert H.G. and E. Yamaguchi (1992), ‘Potentials of Eastern Germany as a Future Location of Foreign Investment — An Empirical Study with regard to Japanese Investors',ifo Studien zur Strukturforschung, no. 16, ifo Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. Munich.

  • Branson W.H. (1970), ‘Monetary Policy and the New View of International Capital Movements’,Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 2, pp. 235–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesanstalt für vereinigungsbedingte Sonderaufgaben (BVS) (1995),Abschluβstatistik der Treuhandanstalt per 31.12.1994 — internal report, Berlin.

  • Casson M.C. (1987),The Firm and the Market. Studies on Multinational Enterprise and the Scope of the Firm, Oxford.

  • Deutsche Bundesbank (1994, 1995),Kapitalverflechtung mit dem Ausland, Frankfurt am Main.

  • Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW) Berlin and Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW) Kiel (1992), ‘Gesamtwirtschaftliche und unternehmerische Anpassungsprozesse in Ostdeutschland — Siebter Bericht’,Kiel Discussion Papers, no. 198–199, Kiel.

  • Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW) Berlin, Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW) Kiel and Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH) (1994), ‘Gesamtwirtschaftliche und unternehmerische Anpassungsfortschritte in Ostdeutschland — Zehnter Bericht’,Kiel Discussion Papers, no. 231, Kiel.

  • Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW) Berlin, Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW) Kiel and Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH) (1995), ‘Gesamtwirtschaftliche und unternehmerische Anpassungsfortschritte in Ostdeutschland — Dreizehnter Bericht’,Kiel Discussion Paper, no. 256–257, Kiel.

  • Dunning J.H. (1977), ‘Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the Multinational Enterprise: A Search for an Eclectic Approach’, in Ohlin B., Hasselbom P.O. and P.M. Wijkman (eds.),The International Allocation of Economic Activity, London, pp. 395–418.

  • Dunning J.H. (1981),International Production and the Multinational Enterprise, London.

  • Dunning, J.H. (1988), ‘The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions’,Journal of International Business Studies, no. 19(1), pp. 1–31.

  • Dunning J.H. (1995), ‘The Role of Foreign Direct Investment in a Globalizing Econorny’,Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 48, no. 193, pp. 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd J.E. (1969), ‘International Capital Movements and Monetary Equilibrium’,The American Economic Review, no. 59, pp. 472–492.

  • Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (1992), ‘Sorgen um den Standort Deutschland’, Frankfurt, 26 June.

  • Haas B. (1995), ‘Market Entry of Foreign Enterprises in East Germany during the Privatization Process’. in Quaisser W. et al.,Privatization in Poland and East Germany: A Comparison, vol. II, Working Paper no. 182/183, Osteuropa-Institut Munich, pp. 419–435.

  • Härtel H.-H., Krüger R., Seeler J. and M. Weinhold (1991), ‘Beobachtung und Analyse des Wettbewerbs in den neuen Bundesländern. Zweiter Zwischenbericht gemäβ dem Forschungsauftrag des Bundeswirtschaftsministeriums’, no. 2, HWWA-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Härtel H.-H., Krüger R. et al. (1995),Die Entwicklung des Wettbewerbs in den neuen Bundesländern, Baden-Baden.

  • Hymer S.H. (1976),The International Operation of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Kindleberger C.P. (1969).American Business Abroad: Six Lectures on Direct Investment, New Haven.

  • Krüger R. (1992), ‘Privatisierung ostdeutscher Unternehmen in EG-koordinierten Krisenbranchen’,Wirtschaftsdienst, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 594–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naujoks P., Sander B. and K.-D. Schmidt (1992), ‘Von der Privatisierung zur Sanierung — Kursänderung bei der Treuhandanstalt’,Die Weltwirtschaft, no. 4, Kiel, pp. 425–451.

  • Pindyck R.S. (1991), ‘Irreversibility, Uncertainty and Investment’,Journal of Economic Literature, no. 2(3), pp. 1110–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman A.M. (1980), ‘Internalization as a General Theory of Foreign Direct Investment: A Re-appraisal of the Literature’,Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, no. 116, pp. 365–379.

  • Rugman A.M. (1986), ‘New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: An Assessment of Internalization Theory’Bulletin of Economic Research, no. 38, pp. 101–118.

  • Sander B. (1992), ‘Foreign Investors' Activities in Eastern Germany — Motivations and Strategies’,Kiel Working Paper, no. 550.

  • Schmidt K.-D. (1992), ‘Ownership Structure and Enterprise Performance in the Transition Process: Evidence from Eastern Germany’,Kiel Working Paper, no. 530.

  • Schmidt K.-D. (1994), ‘Treuhandanstalt and Investment Acquisitions: How to Ensure that Contracts are Kept?’,Kiel Working Paper, no. 632.

  • Schmidt K.-D. (1995), ‘Motives of Large Multinationals Investing in Small Transition Countries: A Literature Review’,Kiel Working Paper, no. 668.

  • Siebert H. (1990), ‘The Economic Integration of Germany — An Update’,Kiel Discussion Papers, no. 160a, Kiel.

  • Stehn J. (1992), ‘Ausländische Direktinvestitionen in Industrieländern — Theoretische Erklärungsansätze und empirische Evidenz’,Kieler Studien, no. 245, Tübingen.

  • Treuhand Agency (Treuhandanstalt) (1992–1994a),Monatsinformationen. Mimeo, Berlin, various issues.

  • Treuhand Agency (Treuhandanstalt) (1992–1994b),Verzeichnis der ausländischen Investoren. Mimeo, Berlin, various issues.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sander, B. Foreign investors' activities in the context of East German privatisation: Motivations and strategies. MOCT-MOST 5, 109–132 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00996597

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00996597

Keywords

Navigation