Skip to main content
Log in

The use of bioindicators for monitoring the heavy-metal status of the environment

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biomonitoring is a method of observing the impact of external factors on ecosystems and their development over a long period, or of ascertaining differences between one location and another. A monitor suitable for the subject of the investigation must be chosen, and the comparability of the element concentrations thus determined (both within the investigation and with other studies) must be ensured by adhering to precise sampling guidelines. In addition to the small amount of equipment required, the advantages of biomonitoring lie in the ecosystem approach that permits conclusions going beyond the biomonitor itself. Attention has to be given to the factors that may affect element concentrations and which can lead to incorrect statements if ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U. Arndt, W. Nobel, B. Schweitzer, Bioindikatoren, Möglichkeiten, Grenzen und neue Erkenntnisse, Ulmer, Stuttgart, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bettinelli, S. Spezia, G. Bizzarri, At. Spectrosc., 17 (1996) No. 3, 133.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Breuer, Naturw. Rdsch. 50 (1997) No. 2, 74.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Bruns, A. Siebert, R. Baumbach, J. Mirsch, D. Günter, B. Markert, G.-J. Krauss, Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem., 353 (1995) 101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Ernst, Schwermetallvegetation der Erde, Geobotanica Selecta Bd. 5, Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, 1974, p. 472.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. J. Fiedler, H. J. Rösler, Spurenelemente in der Umwelt, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Stuttgart, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Garty, M. Kauppi, A. Kauppi, J. Environ. Qual. 25 (1996) 265.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Gjengedal, E. Steiness, Environ. Monitoring and Assessment 14 (1990) 77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. S. Groet, Oikos, 27 (1976) 445.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. E. I. Hamilton, Sci. Total Environ., 176 (1995) No. 3, 3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. U. Herpin, Moose als Bioindikatoren von Schwermetalleinträgen. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen für flächenhafte und zeitabhängige Aussagen, Dissertation, University of Osnabrück, 1997.

  12. U. Herpin, J. Berlekamp, B. Markert, B. Wolterbeek, K. Grodzinska, U. Siewers, H. Lieth, V. Weckert, The distribution of heavy metals in a transect of the three states the Netherlands, Germany and Poland, determined with the aid of moss monitoring, 1996.

  13. R. Herzig, Multi-Residue Analysis with Passive Biomonitoring, in: Plants as Biomonitors,B. Markert (Ed.), VCH-Verlagsgesellschaft Weinheim, New York, Basel, Cambridge, 1993, p. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  14. U. Kirschbaum, Flechten erkennen—Luftgüte bestimmen, Ulmer, Stuttgart, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Klein, M. Paulus, Umweltproben für die Schadstoffanalytik im Biomonitoring, G. Fischer Verlag, Jena, Stuttgart, 1995, p. 363.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Klein, M. Paulus, G. Wagner, P. Müller, UWSF—Z. Umweltchem. Ökotox. 6 (1994) No. 4, 223.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Markert, J. Oehlmann, M. Roth, General Aspects of Heavy Metal Monitoring by Plants and Animals, in:K. S. Subramanian, G. V. Iyengar, (Eds), Environmental Biomonitoring—Exposure Assessment and Specimen Banking, ACS Symp. Ser. 654, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1997, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Markert, J. Oehlmann, Thesenpapier zur Standort- und Begriffsbestimmung in der Bioindikation; in: Bioindikation: Neue Entwicklungen, Nomenklatur, Synökologische Aspekte, Vol. 1,U. Arndt, A. Fomin, S. Lorenz (Eds), Hohenheimer Workshop zur Bioindikation am Kraftwerk Altbach-Deizisau, Verlag Günter Heimbach, Ostfildern, 1996, p. 281.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Markert, Instrumental element and multielement analysis of plant samples—methods and applications, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Markert, UWSF Z. Umweltchem. Ökotox. 6 (1994) 145.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Markert, Instrumental Analysis of Plants, in: Plants as BiomonitorsB. Markert, (Ed.), VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, New York, Basel, Cambridge, 1993, p. 644.

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. Markert, W. Weckert, Toxicol. Environ. Chem., 40 (1993) 43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Å. Rühling, Atmospheric Heavy Metal Deposition in Europe—Estimation Based on Moss Analysis, Nordic Council of Ministers (NORD 1994:9), 1994.

  24. Å. Rühling, L. Rasmussen, K. Pilegaard, A. Mäkinen, E. Steinnes, Survey of atmospheric heavy metal deposition—monitored by moss analyses (NORD 1987:21) 1987.

  25. Å. Rühling, G. Tyler, Bot. Notiser., 121 (1968) 321.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Wagner, Biomonitoring und Umweltprobenbank als Instrumente einer langfristigen Umweltbeobachtung. Beitrag zum Symposium über Umweltfragen, Luxembourg, 1989.

  27. L. Weissflog, K. Wienhold, K. D. Wenzel, G. Schüürmann, Z. Umweltchem. Ökotox., 6 (1994) No. 2, 75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. H. T. Wolterbeek, P. Kuik, T. G. Verburg, U. Herpin, B. Markert, L. Thöni, Environ. Monit. Assess., 35 (1995) 263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Wyttenbach, S. Bajo, L. Tobler, T. Keller, Plant Soil 85 (1985) 313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markert, B., Wappelhorst, O., Weckert, V. et al. The use of bioindicators for monitoring the heavy-metal status of the environment. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 240, 425–429 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02349387

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02349387

Keywords

Navigation