Abstract
Data on seismic background noise are collected, amongst others, for assessing the suitability of sites for temporary or permanent seismic recordings. Site quality requirements depend on the task of seismic observations and thus on their resolution, dynamic range, bandwidth and frequency range. Till now noise data are collected with a wide range of instruments, both analog and digital, of different bandwidth, resolution and transfer functions. Accordingly, noise appearence in seismic records, amplitude- and frequency-wise, differs and the various kinds of noise spectra derived therefrom vary too. They are not easily comparable amongst each other and with older presentations of noise ‘spectra’ derived from analog records. Also, when having determined noise power density spectra from digital records it is not so obvious what this means in terms of noise ground motion amplitudes or noise appearance in records of different bandwidth and vice versa. The paper does not aim at serving as a guide to station site selection but rather to present and comment the relationships to be used for the conversion of power and amplitude spectra into different kinematic units and for calculating from the spectral representations of seismic noise the related frequency dependent RMS or average peak amplitudes of different bandwidth and vice versa. For the new global high (NHNM) and low-noise model (NLNM) given by Peterson (1993) in dB of acceleration power density the related velocity and displacement power spectral densities are presented both graphically and tabulated. Examples for the application of the conversion relationships and the effect of bandwidth on noise and signal amplitudes are given. For a selected data set from a site-selection noise survey in NW Iran the suitability of some potential sites is assessed by comparison with the NLNM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aki, K. and Richards, P. G., 1980. Quantitative seismology – theory and methods. Vol. 1, W.H.Freeman and Company, San Francisco.
Berckhemer, H., 1971. The concept of wide band seismometry. In: Van Gils, J.M. (ed.), Proceedings of the XIIe Assemblée Générale de la Commission Séismologique Européenne, Luxembourg, 2129 Septembre 1970, Observatoire Royal de Belgique, Communications, Série A – No. 13, Série Géophysique No. 101, 214–220.
Bormann, P., Wylegalla, K. and Klinge, K.D., 1997. Analysis of broadband seismic noise at the German Regional Seismic Network and search for improved alternative sites. J. Seismology 1: 357–381.
Brune, J. N. and Oliver, J., 1959. The seismic noise of the Earth's surface. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 49, 4, 349–353.
Field, E. H., Clement, A. C., Jacob, K. H., Aharonian, V., Hough, S. E., Friberg, P. A., Babaian, T. O., Karapetian, S. S., Hovanessian, S. M. and Abramian, H. A., 1995. Earthquake siteresponse study in Giumri (formerly Leninakan), Armenia, using ambient noise observations. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 1, 349–353.
Fix, J. E., 1972. Ambient Earth motion in the period range from 0.1 to 2560 sec. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 62, 1753–1760.
Lachet, C. and Bard, P.Y., 1994. Numerical and theoretical investigations on the possibilities and limitations of the ‘Nakamura's’ technique. J. Physics of the Earth 42, 377–397.
Melton, B. S., 1978. The sensitivity and dynamic range of inertial seismographs. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 14, 93–116.
Nakamura, Y., 1989. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Q. Rep. Railway Tech. Res. Inst. 30, 1.
Peterson, J., 1993. Observations and modeling of seismic background noise. U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Report 93322, 95 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bormann, P. Conversion and comparability of data presentations on seismic background noise. Journal of Seismology 2, 37–45 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009780205669
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009780205669