Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond Rock and Roll: The Economic Impact of the Grateful Dead on a Local Economy

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For-profit popular music concerts, a seldom studied event, may create sizeable economic impacts in a local economy. Using information from a survey of more than 1,000 concert goers to a Grateful Dead performance in Las Vegas and RIMS II multipliers, we estimate income and employment impacts. We conclude that the potential large spill-overs effects of such an event should not be ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • The American Assembly (1984) The Arts and Public Policy in the United States. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balfe, Judith H. (1993) Paying the Piper: Causes and Consequences of Art Patronage. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, Stephen (1991) Public Money and the Muse. W. W. Norton & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Judith R., Newman, Laurie, and Schwartz, Joseph E. (1986) “Internal Economies of Scale in Performing Arts Organizations”, Journal of Cultural Economics 10: 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, Mark (1976) The Economics of the Arts. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, Mark (1980) “A Postscript to the Edinburgh Conference on Cultural Economics”, in William S. Hendon, James L. Shanahan, and Alice J. MacDonald (eds.), Economic Policy for the Arts. Abt Books, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Milton C. and Katz, Richard S. (1987) The Patron State: Government and the Arts in Europe, North America, and Japan. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cwi, David and Lydall, Katherine (1977) Economic Impact of the Arts and Cultural Institutions: A Model for Assessment and a Case Study in Baltimore. Research Division, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deboer, Larry (1985) “Is Rock'n'Roll a Symptom of Bumol's Disease?”, Journal of Cultural Economics 9: 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J. (1986) Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiNoto, Michael J. and Merk, Lawrence H. (1993) “Small Economy Estimates on the Impact of the Arts”, Journal of Cultural Economics 17: 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno (1986) “The Salzburg Festival: An Economic Point of View”, Journal of Cultural Economics 10: 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno (1994) “The Economics of Music Festivals”, Journal of Cultural Economics 18: 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno and Pommerehne, Werner W. (1989) Muses and Markets: Explorations in the Economics of the Arts. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillard, Jean-Pierre (1985) “The Symphony as a Public Service: The Orchestra of Paris”, Journal of Cultural Economics 9: 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, Henry (1986) “Nonprofit Enterprise in the Performing Arts”, in Paul J. DiMaggio (ed.), Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Justin (1990) Arts, Culture, and Enterprise: The Politics of Art and the Cultural Industries. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Michael (1994) Free Expression, Public Support, and Censorship. University Press of America, Lanham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Clare J. A. (1993) “Economic Impact of the Arts: Theater Festivals in Small Ontario Communities”, Journal of Cultural Economics 17: 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, Kevin V. (1986) “The Arts and Their Economic Impact: The Values of Utility”, The Journal of Arts Management and Law 16: 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netzer, Dick (1978) The Subsidized Muse: Public Support for the Arts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankratz, David B. (1989) “Arts Policy and Older Adults”, Journal of Arts Management and Law 18: 13–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankratz, David B. and Morris, Valerie B. (1990) The Future of the Arts: Public Policy and Arts Research. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickman, Dan and R. Keith Schwer (1995) “A Comparison of the Multipliers of IMPLAN, REMI, and RIMS II: Benchmarking Ready-Made Models for Comparison”, The Annals of Regional Science 29: 363–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, David and Withers, Glenn (1985) “What Price Culture?”, Journal of Cultural Economics 9: 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce (1992) Regional Multipliers: A User Handbook for the Regional Input-Output Modeling System (RIMS II). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcook, George (1985) The State and the Arts in Canada. Douglas & McIntyre Ltd., Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler, Joseph W. (1994) Arts in Crisis. Chicago Review Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gazel, R.C., Schwer, R.K. Beyond Rock and Roll: The Economic Impact of the Grateful Dead on a Local Economy. Journal of Cultural Economics 21, 41–55 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007372721259

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007372721259

Navigation