Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does public support make a difference, and for whom?

The impact of gender on the income level and public support of artists in different art forms

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper discusses the impact of gender on the income level and public support of artists in Finland. The empirical data is based on a research project carried out in the Arts Council of Finland. The data discussed in this paper indicated that the average income level of women artists is lower than their male colleagues. There was, however, no significant evidence of a gender bias in the distribution of public support for artists. The variation in the economic situation of artists seems to be notably stronger according to art form than according to gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australia Council (1984) Women in the Arts: A Strategy for Action. Australia Council, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australia Council (1988) Women in the Arts: Further Strategy for Action. Australia Council, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J. (1991) “Decentralisation of Arts Funding from the Federal Government to the States”, in S. Benedict, ed., Public Money and the Muse. Norton, New York, pp. 216–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstad, J.I. and Pedersen, K.R. (1996) Kunstnernes Økonomiske vilkår. Rapport fra Inntekts-og yrkesundersøkelsen blant kunstnere 1993–94. INAS Rapport 1996: 1. Institutt for sosialforskning, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. and Pommerehne, W.W. (1989) Muses and Markets. Explorations in Economics of the Arts. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen, M.(1995) “Evaluating the Effects of Direct Support on the Economic Situation of Artists”. Journal of Cultural Economics 19: 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen, M. and Karhunen, P. (1994) “The Focus and Functions of Public Support for Artists in Finland”. The Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society 24: 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen, I. (1995) “Development of Finnish Cultural Policy: An Outline”, in Cultural Policy in Finland. National Report. Helsinki: Council of Europe and the Arts Council of Finland, Research and Information Unit, Helsinki, pp. 29–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irjala, A. (1992) A Minority in Music. Women as Professional Composers and Musicians. Working Papers Nr 17/1992. Arts Council of Finland, Research and Information Unit, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Arts Council (1992) Occupation: Artist. A Profile of the Demographic, Economic and Employment Characteristics of Artists in Ontario. OAC Arts Occupation Series.

  • Throsby, D. and Thompson B. (1994) But What Do You Do for a Living? A New Economic Study of Australian Artists. School of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney. Australia Council.

  • Throsby, D. and Thompson, B. (1995) The Artist at Work. Some Further Results from the 1988 Survey of Individual Artists. School of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney. Australia Council.

  • Towse, R. (1994) “Achieving Public Policy Objectives in the Arts Heritage”, in A. Peacock and I. Rizzo, eds, Cultural Economics and Cultural Policies. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 143–167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heikkinen, M., Karhunen, P. Does public support make a difference, and for whom?. J Cult Econ 20, 341–358 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-005-1358-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-005-1358-x

Key words

Navigation