Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariate analysis of experimental and computational descriptors of molecular lipophilicity

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two experimental (log P, RMw) and 17 calculation descriptors for molecular lipophilicity (fragmental, atom-based or based on molecular properties) were investigated by multivariate analysis for a database of 159 compounds including both simple structures as well as more complex drug molecules. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the entire database exhibits a clustering of chemical groups; preciseness of clustering corresponds to chemical similarity. Thus, diversity searching in databases might effectively be performed by PCA on the basis of calculated log P. The comparative validity check of experimental and computational procedures by regression analysis and PCA was performed with a chemically balanced, reduced data set (n=55) representing 11 chemical groups with 5 members each. Regression of experimental descriptors (log Poct versus RMw) proves that chromatographic data, obtained under well-defined experimental conditions, can be used as valid substitutes for log P. Regression of calculated versus experimental lipophilicity data shows a superiority of fragmental over atom-based methods and approaches based on molecular properties, as indicated by correlation coefficients, slopes and intercepts. In addition, PCA revealed that fragmental methods (Rekker-type, KOWWIN, KLOGP) sense the compound ranking in log P data to almost the same extent as experimental approaches. For atom-based procedures and CLOGP, both the comparability of absolute values and the sensing of the compound ranking in the database are slightly less. This trend is more pronounced for the methods based on molecular properties, with the exception of BLOGP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hansch, C., Leo, A. and Hoekman, D., Exploring QSAR. Hydrophobic, Electronic, and Steric Constants. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mannhold, R., Dross, K. and Rekker, R.F., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 9 (1990) 21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mannhold, R., Rekker, R.F., Sonntag, C., ter Laak, A.M., Dross, K. and Polymeropoulos, E.E., J. Pharm. Sci., 84 (1995) 1410.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor, P.J. and Cruickshank, J.M., J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 37 (1985) 143.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dross, K., Sonntag, Ch. and Mannhold, R., J. Chromatogr., A 638 (1993) 287.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dross, K., Sonntag, Ch. and Mannhold, R., J. Chromatogr., A 673 (1994) 113.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rekker, R.F., The Hydrophobic Fragmental Constant. Pharmacochemistry Library, Vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rekker, R.F. and Mannhold, R., Calculation of Drug Lipophilicity, VCH, Weinheim, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leo, A., Jow, P.Y.C., Silipo, C. and Hansch, C., J. Med. Chem., 18 (1975) 865.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hansch, C. and Leo, A.J., Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology, Wiley, New York, NY, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klopman, G., Li, J.-Y., Wang, S. and Dimayuga, M., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34 (1994) 752.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meylan, W. and Howard, P., J. Pharm. Sci., 84 (1995) 83.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ghose, A.K. and Crippen, G.M., J. Comput. Chem., 7 (1986) 565.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghose, A.K. and Crippen, G.M., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 27 (1987) 21.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghose, A.K., Pritchett, A. and Crippen, G.M., J. Comput. Chem., 9 (1988) 80.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Viswanadhan, V.N., Ghose, A.K., Revankar, G.R. and Robins, R.K., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29 (1989) 163.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brickmann, J. and Waldherr-Teschner, M., Informationstechnik, 33 (1991) 83.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Suzuki, T. and Kudo, Y., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 4 (1990) 155.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Convard, T., Dubost, J.-P., Le Solleu, H. and Kummer, E. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 13 (1994) 34.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kellogg, G.E. and Abraham, D., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 5 (1991) 545.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van de Waterbeemd, H., Karajiannis, H., Kansy, M., Obrecht, D., Mueller, K. and Lehmann, Ch., Conformation-lipophilicity relationships of peptides and peptide mimetics. In Sanz, F. (Ed.) Trends in QSAR and Molecular Modeling 94, Prous, Barcelona (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wold, S., Esbensen, K. and Geladi, P., Chem. Intell. Lab. System, 2 (1987) 37.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Baroni, M., Costantino, G., Cruciani, G., Riganelli, D., Valigi, R. and Clementi, S., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 12 (1993) 9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wold, S., University of Umeå, 1983.

  25. Lipophilicity in Drug Action and Toxicology (eds. V. Pliska, B. Testa and H. van de Waterbeemd), in: Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry, VCH Publishers, Weinheim, 1996.

  26. Leo, A., Chem. Rev., 93 (1993) 1281.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pixner, P., Heiden, W., Merx, H., Moeckel, G., Möller, A. and Brickmann, J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34 (1994) 1309.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heiden, W., Moeckel, G. and Brickmann, J., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 7 (1993) 503.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gaillard, P., Carrupt, P.-A., Testa, B. and Boudon, A., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 83.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Richards, N.G.J. and Williams, P.B., Chem. Design Automat. News, 9 (1994) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kim, K. H., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 308.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kellogg, G.E., Joshi, G.S. and Abraham, D.J., Med. Chem. Res., 1 (1992) 444.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Abraham, D. and Kellogg, G.E., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 8 (1994) 41.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cruciani, G., Clementi, S., Fravolini, A., Cecchetti, V., Tabarrini, O. and Filipponi, E., XIII meeting of the Italian Pharm. Chemistry Society, Paestum, Italy, 1996, abstr. book P 126.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mannhold, R. and Dross, K., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 15 (1996) 403.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mannhold, R., Cruciani, G., Dross, K. et al. Multivariate analysis of experimental and computational descriptors of molecular lipophilicity. J Comput Aided Mol Des 12, 573–581 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008060415622

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008060415622

Navigation