Abstract
In this contribution we suggest a heuristic molecular lipophilicitypotential (HMLP), which is a structure-based technique requiring noempirical indices of atomic lipophilicity. The input data used in thisapproach are molecular geometries and molecular surfaces. The HMLP is amodified electrostatic potential, combined with the averaged influences fromthe molecular environment. Quantum mechanics is used to calculate theelectron density function ρ(r) and the electrostatic potential V(r), andfrom this information a lipophilicity potential L(r) is generated. The HMLPis a unified lipophilicity and hydrophilicity potential. The interactions ofdipole and multipole moments, hydrogen bonds, and charged atoms in amolecule are included in the hydrophilic interactions in this model. TheHMLP is used to study hydrogen bonds and water–octanol partitioncoefficients in several examples. The calculated results show that the HMLPgives qualitatively and quantitatively correct, as well as chemicallyreasonable, results in cases where comparisons are available. Thesecomparisons indicate that the HMLP has advantages over the empiricallipophilicity potential in many aspects. The HMLP is a three-dimensional andeasily visualizable representation of molecular lipophilicity, suggested asa potential tool in computer-aided three-dimensional drug design.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hansch, C., In Ariens, E.J. (Ed.) Drug Design, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, NY, U.S.A., 1971, p. 271.
Loew, G.H., Villar, H.O. and Alkorta, I., Pharm. Res., 10 (1993) 475.
Klebe, G., Abraham, U. and Mietzner, T., J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 4130.
Jain, A.N., Koile, K. and Chapman, D., J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 2315.
Kellogg, G.E. and Abraham, D.J., J. Mol. Graph., 10 (1992) 212.
Forsman, J. and Jönsson, B., J. Chem. Phys., 101 (1994) 5116.
Guillot, B., Guissani, Y. and Bratos, S., J. Chem. Phys., 95 (1991) 3643.
Tanaka, H. and Nakanishi, K., J. Chem. Phys., 95 (1991) 3719.
Haile, J.M., Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Wiley, New York, NY, U.S.A, 1992.
Smith, D.E. and Haymet, A.D.J., J. Chem. Phys., 98 (1992) 6444.
Miertus, S. and Tomasi, J., Chem. Phys., 65 (1982) 239.
Miertus, S. and Moravek, R., Coll. Czech-Slov. Chem. Commun., 55 (1990) 2430.
Wong, M.W., Frisch, M.J. and Wiberg, K.B., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113 (1991) 4776.
Bonaccorsi, R., Floris, F., Palla, P. and Tomasi, J., Thermochim. Acta, 162 (1990) 213.
Cramer, C.J. and Truhlar, D.G., J. Comput. Chem., 13 (1992) 1089.
Field, M.J., Bash, P.A. and Karplus, M., J. Comput. Chem., 11 (1990) 700.
Leo, A., Hansch, C. and Elkins, D., Chem. Rev., 71 (1971) 525.
Eisenberg, D., Weiss, R.M. and Terwilliger, T.C., Nature, 299 (1982) 371.
Eisenberg, D. and McLachlan, A.D., Nature, 319 (1986) 199.
Heiden, W., Moeckel, G. and Brickmann, J., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 7 (1993) 503.
Náray-Szabó, G. and Nagy, P., Int. J. Quantum Chem., 35 (1989) 215.
Náray-Szabó, G., J. Mol. Graph., 7 (1989) 76.
Náray-Szabó, G., J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 138 (1986) 197.
Croizet, F., Langlois, M.H., Dubost, J.P., Braquet, P., Audry, E., Dallet, Ph. and Colleter, J.C., J. Mol. Graph., 8 (1990) 153.
Furet, P., Sele, A. and Cohen, N.C., J. Mol. Graph., 6 (1988) 182.
Ghose, A.K. and Crippen, G.M., J. Comput. Chem., 7 (1986) 565.
Viswanadhan, V.N., Ghose, A.K., Revankar, G.R. and Robins, R.K., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29 (1989) 163.
Audry, E., Dubost, J.-P., Colleter, J.-C. and Dallet, P., Eur. J. Med. Chem.-Chim. Thér., 21 (1986) 71.
Audry, E., Dubost, J.-P., Dallet, P., Langlois, M.H. and Colleter, J.-C., Eur. J. Med. Chem.-Chim. Thér., 24 (1989) 155.
Goodford, P.J., J. Med. Chem., 28 (1985) 849.
Kantola, A., Villar, H.O. and Loew, G.H., J. Comput. Chem., 12 (1991) 681.
Bodor, N., Gabanyi, Z. and Wong, C.K., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111 (1989) 3783.
Politzer, P. and Truhlar, D.G. (Eds.) Chemical Applications of Atomic and Molecular Electrostatic Potentials, Plenum, New York, NY, U.S.A., 1981.
Politzer, P. and Murray, J.S., In Lipkowitz, K.B. and Boyd, D.B. (Eds.) Reviews in Computational Chemistry, VCH, New York, NY, U.S.A., 1991.
Rozas, I., Du, Q. and Arteca, G.A., J. Mol. Graph., 13 (1995) 98.
Murray, J.S., Brinck, T., Lane, P., Paulsen, K. and Politzer, P., J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 307 (1993) 55.
Politzer, P., Lane, P., Murray, J.S. and Brinck, T., J. Phys. Chem., 96 (1992) 7938.
Murray, J.S., Brinck, T. and Politzer, P., J. Phys. Chem., 97 (1993) 13807.
Binck, T., Murray, J.S. and Politzer, P., J. Org. Chem., 58 (1993) 7070.
Du, Q. and Arteca, G.A., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 10 (1996) 133.
Israelachvili, J.N., Intermolecular and Surface Forces, Academic Press, London, U.K., 1992.
Head-Gordon, T., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117 (1995) 501.
Dogonadze, R.R., Kornyshev, A.A. and Ulstrup, J., In Dogonadze, R.R., Kálmán, E., Kornyshev, A.A. and Ulstrup, J. (Eds.) The Chemical Physics of Solvation, Part A: Theory of Solvation, Plenum, New York, NY, U.S.A., 1985.
Frank, H. and Evans, M., J. Chem. Phys., 13 (1945) 507.
Murray, J.S., Ranganathan, S. and Politzer, P., J. Org. Chem., 56 (1991) 3734.
Gao, J., In Smith, D.A. (Ed.) Modeling the Hydrogen Bond, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, U.S.A., 1994.
Mishra, P.C. and Kumar, A., In Sen, K. (Ed.), Topics in Current Chemistry (174), Molecular similarity II, Springer, New York, NY, U.S.A., 1995.
Mezey, P.G., In Lipkowitz, K.B. and Boyd, D.B. (Eds.) Reviews of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 1, VCH, New York, NY, U.S.A., 1990.
Mezey, P.G., Int. J. Quantum Chem., Quantum Biol. Symp., 12 (1986) 113.
Mezey, P.G., Shape in Chemistry: An Introduction to Molecular Shape and Topology, VCH, New York, NY, U.S.A., 1993.
Walker, P.D. and Mezey, P.G., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115 (1993) 12423.
Walker, P.D. and Mezey, P.G., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116 (1994) 12022.
Mezey, P.G., Struct. Chem., 6 (1995) 261.
Mezey, P.G., J. Math. Chem., 18 (1995) 141.
Du, Q. and Arteca, G.A., J. Comput. Chem., 17 (1996) 1258.
Connolly, M.L., Science, 221 (1983) 709.
Connolly, M.L., J. Appl. Crystallogr., 16 (1983) 548.
Connolly, M.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107 (1985) 1118.
Ooi, T., Oobatake, M., Némethy, G. and Scheraga, H.A., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84 (1987) 3086.
Cabani, S. and Gianni, P., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I, 75 (1979) 1184.
Cabani, S., Gianni, P., Mollica, V. and Lepori, L., J. Solution Chem., 10 (1981) 563.
Klebe, G. and Abraham, U., J. Med. Chem., 36 (1993) 70.
Lee, S.H. and Rossky, P.J., J. Chem. Phys., 100 (1994) 3334.
Piculell, L., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 82 (1986) 387.
Piculell, L. and Halle, B., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 82 (1986) 401.
Halle, B. and Piculell, L., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 82 (1986) 415.
Borman, S., C. & EN, August (1995) 29.
Dean, P.M., Molecular Foundations of Drug–Receptor Interactions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1987.
Frank, R., Theoretical Drug Design Methods, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1984.
Geladi, P. and Kowalski, B., Anal. Chim. Acta, 185 (1986) 1.
Geladi, P. and Kowalski, B., Anal. Chim. Acta, 185 (1986) 19.
Cramer III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5959.
Marshall, G.R. and Cramer III, R.D., Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 9 (1988) 285.
Cramer III, R.D., Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110 (1988) 5959.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Du, Q., Arteca, G.A. & Mezey, P.G. Heuristic lipophilicity potential for computer-aided rational drug design. J Comput Aided Mol Des 11, 503–515 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007949918800
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007949918800