Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the use of computer models in participatory integrated assessment – experiences and recommendations for further steps

  • Published:
Integrated Assessment

Abstract

Integrated assessment (IA) can be defined as a structured process of dealing with complex issues, using knowledge from various scientific disciplines and/or stakeholders, such that integrated insights are made available to decision makers (J. Rotmans, Enviromental Modelling and Assessment 3 (1998) 155). There is a growing recognition that the participation of stakeholders is a vital element of IA. However, only little is known about methodological requirements for such participatory IA and possible insights to be gained from these approaches. This paper summarizes some of the experiences gathered in the ULYSSES project, which aims at developing procedures that are able to bridge the gap between environmental science and democratic policy making for the issue of climate change. The discussion is based on a total of 52 IA focus groups with citizens, run in six European and one US city. In these groups, different computer models were used, ranging from complex and dynamic global models to simple accounting tools. The analysis in this paper focuses on the role of the computer models. The findings suggest that the computer models were successful at conveying to participants the temporal and spatial scale of climate change, the complexity of the system and the uncertainties in our understanding of it. However, most participants felt that the computer models were less instrumental for the exploration of policy options. Furthermore, both research teams and participants agreed that despite considerable efforts, most models were not sufficiently user-friendly and transparent for being accessed in an IA focus group. With that background, some methodological conclusions are drawn about the inclusion of the computer models in the deliberation process. Furthermore, some suggestions are made about how given models should be adapted and new ones developed in order to be helpful for participatory IA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Rotmans, Environmental Modelling and Assessment 3 (1998) 155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S.O. Funtovicz and J.R. Ravetz, Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. F.L. Toth and E. Hizsnyik, Environmental Modelling and Assessment 3 (1998) 193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E.A. Parson, Environmental Modelling and Assessment 2 (1997) 267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. http://www.zit.th-darmstadt.de/ulysses

  6. J. Jäger, Environmental Modelling and Assessment 3 (1998) 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R.S.J. Tol, Vellinga and Pier, Environmental Modelling and Assessment 3 (1998) 181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Kasemir, Behringer, Jeannette, De Marchi, Bruna, Deuker, Christoph, Dürrenberger, Gregor, Funtowicz, Silvio, Gerger, Asa, Giaoutzi, Maria, Haffner, Yvonne, Nilsson, Mans, Querol, Cristina, Schüle, Ralf, Tabara, David, van Asselt, Marjolein, Vassilarou and W. Demetra, Focus Groups in Integrated Assessment – The ULYSSES pilot Experience, Technical University of Darmstadt, ZIT Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, Darmstadt (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  9. U. Dahinden, Querol, Cristina, Jäger, Jill, Nilsson and Mans, Using computer models in participatory integrated assessment – Experiences gathered in the ULYSSES project and recommendations for further steps, ULYSSES working paper WP-99-2, Technical University of Darmstadt, Sociological Institute, Darmstadt (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Dürrenberger, Behringer, Jeannette, Dahinden, Urs, Gerger, Asa, Kasemir, Bernd, Querol, Cristina, Schüle, Ralf, Tabara, David, Toth, Ferenc, van Asselt, Marjolein, Vassilarou, Demetra, Willi, Nicole, Jaeger and Carlo (1997), Focus Groups in Integrated Assessment. A manual for a participatory tool, ULYSSES working paperWP-97-2, Technical University of Darmstadt, ZIT Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, Darmstadt, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ULYSSES, Technical University of Darmstadt, ZIT Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, Darmstadt, 1998.

  12. http://hdgc.epp.cmu.edu/public/icam/icam.html

  13. http://CLEAR.eawag.ch/models/impactsE.html

  14. C. Schlumpf, Behringer, Jeannette, Dürrenberger, Gregor, Pahl-Wostl and Claudia, Environmental Modelling and Assessment 4 (1998) 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. http://CLEAR.eawag.ch/models/cozweiE.html

  16. B. De Marchi, S. Funtowicz, C. Gough, A. Guimarães Pereira and E. Rota, The ULYSSES Voyage: The ULYSSES project at the JRC. EUR 17760EN (Joint Research Centre – European Commission, Ispra, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. van der Sluijs, Jaeger and Jill, Towards a Typology for Computer Tools for participatory Integrated Assessment, Working paper, University of Utrecht, Utrecht (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Stocks, Citizen discussions of computer models in global climate change focus groups, Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.G. Morgan, Smuts, Tom, Dowlatabadi, Hadi, Fischhoff, Baruch, Lave, Lester, Rubin, eds., Brochure: Global Warming and Climate Change (Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Nilsson, Computer Tool Experiences in ULYSSES (Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D.H. Meadows, D.L. Meadows, J. Randers and W.W. Behrens, The Limits to Growth (Universe Books, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Oakhill, Mental Models in Cognitive Science (Taylor and Francis, London, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Bostrom, M.G. Morgan, B. Fischhoff and D. Read, Risk Analysis 14 (1994) 959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. P.N. Johnson-Laird, Mental Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Kahneman, Slovic, Paul, Tversky and Amos, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, 1991) (first published: 1982).

  26. G. Gigerenzer, Todd and M. Peter, Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart (Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Guimaraes, Gough, Clair, De Marchi and Bruna, International Journal of Environment and Pollution (1998), accepted.

  28. E. Darier, Schuele and Ralf, “Think Globally, Act Locally?” Climate Change and Public Participation in Manchester and Frankfurt, Local Environment (1998), submitted.

  29. E. Darier, Gough, Clair, De Marchi, Bruna, Funtowicz, Silvio, R. Grove-White, Kitchener, Dryan, Pereira, Angela, Wynne and Brian, Between Democracy and Expertise? Citizens' Participation and Environmental Integrated Assessment in Venice (Italy) and St. Helens (UK), Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning (1998), submitted.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahinden, U., Querol, C., Jäger, J. et al. Exploring the use of computer models in participatory integrated assessment – experiences and recommendations for further steps. Integrated Assessment 1, 253–266 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018901603136

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018901603136

Navigation