Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Electricity and emission-permits trade as a means of curbing CO2 emissions in the Nordic countries

  • Published:
Integrated Assessment

Abstract

The four Nordic countries Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Norway have fully integrated electricity grids, implying that electricity trade hitherto has accounted for a crucial part of each country’s power balance. Electricity trade also provides cost-efficient opportunities for the Nordic countries to either jointly or separately fulfil their CO2 obligations. Assuming the targets that were agreed upon in (the aftermath of) the Kyoto negotiations in 1997, and establishing scenarios where CO2-emission-permits trade among the Nordic countries is allowed, it is shown that the value of emission trading is somewhat larger than the corresponding value of electricity trade. Furthermore, if both electricity and emission permits can be traded on a common Nordic market this can lead to amplified economic benefits yielding a gain that exceeds the sum of the separate values of electricity and emission permits trade. It is also shown that the additional costs of fulfilling the Kyoto protocol are small compared to the total costs of the Nordic energy system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FCCC, Report of the conference of the parties on its third session, held at Kyoto from 1 to 11 December 1997, FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add. 1.

  2. Bahn et al., Advanced mathematical programming modeling to assess the benefits from international CO2 abatement cooperation, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 3 (1998) 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Larsson, Grohnheit and Unander, Common action and electricity trade in Northern Europe, International Transactions in Operational Research 5(1) (1998).

  4. NORDEL,Årsberättelse 1997 (in Nordic languages).

  5. Dansk Elforsyning Statistik 1996, Danske Elvaerkers Forening (in Danish).

  6. Energy Statistics 1996, Statistics Finland.

  7. W. Marcuse et al., A dynamic time dependant model for the analysis of alternate energy policies, in: Operational Research '75, ed. K.B. Haley (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1976) pp. 647–667.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fishbone and Abilock, MARKAL - A linear programming model for energy system analysis - technical description of the BNL version, Energy Research, Vol. 5 (1981).

  9. P. Andersen and P. Fuglsang, Vurdering av udviklingsforløb for vindkraftteknologien, RISØ-R-829(DA) (Forskningscenter RISØ, Roskilde, 1996) (in Danish).

    Google Scholar 

  10. IPCC, 2nd National Communications for Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Finland.

  11. W.D. Nordhaus, The Swedish Dilemma - Nuclear energy vs. the Environment, SNS No 74 Occasional Paper (Nov-95).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. EST, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96, Göteborg, Sweden

    T. Unger

  2. Institute for Energy Technology, PO Box 2007, Kjeller, Norway

    L. Alm

Authors
  1. T. Unger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Alm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Unger, T., Alm, L. Electricity and emission-permits trade as a means of curbing CO2 emissions in the Nordic countries. Integrated Assessment 1, 229–240 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019135900303

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019135900303

Keywords

Search

Navigation