Abstract
The chemical shift ofμ −O in water, ice and in aqueous hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was examined using μ−O resonance. Two distinct signals are obtained in water and ice. Usingμ + resonance signal as a standard, the observed shiftsδg are −7.0×10−4 (signal A) and −12.1×10−4 (signal B) respectively. The intensity of the two fractions are almost equivalent in water; however, in ice, the intensity of signal B decreases with increase of signal A. After the addition of hydrogen peroxide to the water signal B disappears, A increases, and the total amplitude is increased.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K.W. Ford, V.W. Hughes and J.G. Wills, Phys. Rev.129 (1963) 194.
A.A. Dzhuraev, V.S. Evseev, Yu.V. Obukhov and V.S. Roganov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz62 (1972) 2210; Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.66 (1974) 433; A.A. Dzhuraev and V.S. Evseev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.62 (1972) 1166.
D.P. Huchinson, J. Menes, G. Saphiros, A.M. Patlach and S. Penman, Phys. Rev. Lett.7 (1961) 129; D.P. Huchinson, J. Menes, G. Saphiros and A.M. Patlach, Phys. Rev.131 (1963) 1362.
N. Nishidaet al., contribution to this conference; K. Nishiyama, K. Nagamine, H. Kitazawa, E. Torikai, K. Kojima and I. Tanaka, Hyperfine Interactions65 (1990) 1015.
K. Nishiyama, T. Azuma, K. Ishida, T. Matsuzaki, J. Imazato, Y. Yamazaki and K. Nagamine, Hyperfine Interactions32 (1986) 887.
W. Kutzelnigg, U. Fleischer and M. Schindler,NMR Basic Principles and Progress, Vol23 (1990) 165.
R.J. Knight and H.C. Seddon, Trans. Faraday Soc.63 (1967) 2628.
Y. Katsumura, private communication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nishiyama, K., Azuma, T., Dawson, W.K. et al. Redox reaction of μ−O in water determined by the chemical shift. Hyperfine Interact 87, 929–934 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02068485
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02068485