Skip to main content
Log in

Nuclear orientation of thermally prepared114mInCu by the brute-force method

  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report the results of brute-force orientation experiments on several alloys of114mInCu prepared by different thermal methods, with the goal of clarifying the origins of the deviations from the theoretical nuclear orientation effect reported by several groups for this system. In particular, using thin diffused samples we obtain essentially the same attenuation as previously reported for both114mIn and111In implanted into Cu crystals and foils. Thicker diffused or melted samples show less or more attenuation, respectively. We find no evidence for thermal gradients between samples and thermometers as a cause for the observed deviations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.D. Brewer, J. Low Temp. Phys. 27 (1977) 651.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Kaindl, F. Bacon and D.A. Shirley, Phys. Rev. C8 (1973) 315.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.A. Konter and R. Hunik, in Proc. LT 14, ed. M. Krusius and M. Vuorio (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975) vol. 4, p.52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.T. Callaghan, W.M. Lattimer and N.J. Stone, Proc. III Int. Conf. on hyperfine interactions, ed. E. Karlsson and R. Wäppling (Upplands Grafiska AB, Uppsala, 1974) p.272.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W.D. Brewer and M. Kopp, Hyp. Int. 2 (1976) 299.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Marest, R. Haroutunian and I. Berkes, Phys. Rev. C17 (1978) 287.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Nuytten, J. Geenen, D. Vandeplassche, L. Vanneste and E. van Walle, Hyp. Int. 10 (1981) 1195.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Nuytten, D. Vandeplassche, E. van Walle and L. Vanneste, Physica 107B (1981) 367, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 347.

    Google Scholar 

  9. O. Echt, E. Recknagel, A. Weidinger and T. Wichert, Z. Phys. B32 (1978) 59;

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Deicher, O. Echt, E. Recknagel and T. Wichert, Hyp. Int. 10 (1981) 667.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W.M. Lattimer and N.J. Stone, Hyp. Int. 7 (1979) 61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Materials Research Corp., “MARZ” grade copper, nom. 99.999% purity.

  13. L.H. Bennett, R.W. Mebs and R.E. Watson, Phys. Rev. 171 (1968) 611.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Haroutunian, M. Meyer and R. Coussement, Phys. Rev. C17 (1978) 292.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Hohenemser, A.R. Arends, H. de Waard, H.G. Devare, F. Pleiter and S.A. Drentie, Hyp. Int. 3 (1977) 297.

    Google Scholar 

  16. see e.g. J. Flouquet, Ann. de Phys. 8 (1974) 5;

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.C. Chaplin, C.G. Don and G.V.H. Wilson, Phys. Lett. 32A (1970) 137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boysen, J., Brewer, W.D. & Kettschau, A. Nuclear orientation of thermally prepared114mInCu by the brute-force method. Hyperfine Interact 13, 249–255 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027254

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027254

Keywords

Navigation