Skip to main content
Log in

Genotype x environment interactions in a 10 × 10 diallel cross of quality protein maize (Zea mays L.)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A 10×10 diallel cross experiment involving white modified opaque-2 maize inbred lines was grown at four sites. A stability analysis, based on both a combining ability and a heterotic pattern model, was developed. The stability analysis provided valuable information on the genotype x environment interaction properties of the 10 inbred lines. The Gail & Simon (1985) test for qualitative interactions provided a means of determining the nature of these interactions. The inbred, SO507W(M), is shown to have the best potential for use in a hybrid breeding programme, in terms of having the highest weighted general combining ability and line heterosis, and the best general adaptability to all four sites. The single cross, SO713W(P) x PO558W(F), has been identified as one of the genotypes to be used in a recurrent selection programme that favours specific combining ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azzalini, A. & D.R. Cox, 1984. Two new tests associated with the analysis of variance. J.R. Statistics Society B. 46:335–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.J., 1988a. Analysis of genotype-environmental interactions in crops. ISI Atlas of Animal and Plant Sci. 1:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.J., 1988b. Differential response to environmental stress. In: B.S. Weir, E.J. Eisen, M.M. Goodman & G. Namkoong (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Quantitative Genetics. Sinauer and Associates. Sunderland. Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.J., 1988c. Tests for cross over genotype — environmental interactions. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R.E., H.F. Robinson & P.H. Harvey, 1949. A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability. Agronomy J. 41:360–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curnow, R.N., 1980. Selecting crosses using information from a diallel cross. Biometrics 36:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, S.A. & W.A. Russel, 1996. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, K.W. & G.N. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14:742–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G.H., 1973. Statistical methods for the analysis of genotype-environment interactions. Heredity 31:339–354.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G.H. & J.M. Perkins, 1971. Environmental and genotypeenvironmental components of variability VIII. Relation between genotypes grown in different environments and measures of these environments. Heredity 27:15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gail, M. & R. Simon, 1985. Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets. Biometrics 41:361–372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, H.O., 1972. Breeding for improved protein quality in maize. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Afr. 40:81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, H.O. & I.V. Whythe, 1987. Patterns of heterosis in South African maize breeding material. p. 21–26. In: Proc. Seventh S. Afr. Maize Breeding Symp. Potchefstroom. 1986. Tech. Commun. Dept. of Agric. and Water Supply. R.S.A. no. 212.

  • Gregorius, H.R. & G. Namkoong, 1986. Joint analysis of genotypic and environmental effects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 72:413–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardwick, R.C. & J.T. Wood, 1972. Regression methods for studying genotype-environment interactions. Heredity 28:209–222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J., 1976. Genotype-environment interactions — a challenge for plant breeding. J. Agric. Sci. 85:477–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohls, T., G.P.Y. Clarke & H.O. Gevers, 1994. Weighted diallel analysis across environments: combining ability and heterotic pattern models. Biometrical J. 36(8):963–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, F.H., 1945. Recurrent selection for specific combining ability in corn. Agonomy J. 37:134–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.S., M.R. Binns & L.P. Lefkovitch, 1986. Stability analysis. Where do we stand? Crop Sci. 26:894–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.S., M.R. Binns & B.K. Thompson, 1977. The use of regression methods to study genotype-environmentinteractions. Heredity 38:309–319.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, J.M. & J.L. Jinks, 1968. Environmental and genotypeenvironmental components of variability III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23:339–356.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peto, R., 1982. Statistical aspects of cancer trials. p. 867–871. In: E.E. Halnan (Ed). Treatment of Cancer. Chapman and Hall. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla. G.K., 1971. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29:237–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G.W. & W.G. Cochran, 1989. Statistical methods. Eighth edition. lowa State University Press.

  • Virk, D.S. & B.K. Mangat, 1991. Detection of cross over genotype x environment interactions in pearl millet. Euphytica 52:193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westcott, B., 1986. Some methods of analysing genotypeenvironment interaction. Heredity 56:243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A.J., 1971. The analysis and prediction of some two factor interactions in grass breeding. J. Agric. Sci. 76:301–306.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hohls, T., Shanahan, P.E., Peter Clarke, G. et al. Genotype x environment interactions in a 10 × 10 diallel cross of quality protein maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica 84, 209–218 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01681813

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01681813

Key words

Navigation