Skip to main content
Log in

Cryopreservation of pollen from two rose cultivars

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An investigation was undertaken on the storage characteristics of pollen collected from two English rose cultivars. A rapid decline in viability was observed in pollen stored at +4° C and −20° C, whereas the viability of pollen, stored at ultra-low temperature (−196° C), remained constant. Cryopreserved pollen was shown to retain its ability for fertilisation. The effects of the stage of flower development and anther dehiscence were assessed on both pre-and post-cryopreservation viabilities. Successful long-term storage of pollen will facilitate hybridisation of rose species and cultivars that do not flower synchronously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, D., 1988. The Heritage of the Rose. The Antique Collectors Club, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnabas, B. & E. Rajki, 1976. Storage of maize (Zea mays L.) pollen at −196° C in liquid nitrogen. Euphytica 25: 747–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnabas, B., 1983. Freeze preservation of pollen. Les Colloques de l'INRA 21: 429–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beales, P., 1992. Roses, Harper Collins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes, S.A., 1990. Long term storage of Narcissus anthers and pollen in liquid nitrogen. Euphytica 48: 275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D.B., 1975. t-tests and intervals for comparisons suggested by data. Biom. 31: 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudin, S., L. Arene & C. Bulard, 1991. Influence of season on rose quality. Sex. Plant Reprod. 4: 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosh-Khui, M., A. Bassrii & M. Niknejad, 1976. Effects of temperature and humidity on pollen viability of six rose species. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56: 517–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.W., J.A. Thomas & S.L. Buchmann, 1985. Factors affecting in vitro germination and storage of Jojoba pollen. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110: 671–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luza, J.G. & V.S. Polito, 1988. Cryopreservation of English Walnut (Juglans regia L.) pollen. Euphytica 37: 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzur, P., 1984. Freezing of living cells: mechanisms and implications. Am. J. Physiol. 247: 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt, D.E. & A.A. Almehdi, 1984. Liquid nitrogen storage of pollen from five cultivated Prunus species. HortSci. 19: 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, H.M. & P.M. Harney, 1984. Pollen viability in Rosa. HortSci. 19: 710–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, K.C. & A.V. Roberts, 1991. Rosa sp. (roses): in vitro culture, micropropagation and the production of secondary products. In: Y.P.S. Bajaj (Ed). Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry Volume 15, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants III, pp. 377–397, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towill, L.E., 1985. Low temperature and freeze/vacuum-drying preservation of pollen. In: K.K. Kartha (Ed). Cryopreservation of Plant Cells and Organs, pp. 171–198. CRC Press Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towill, L.E., 1991. Cryopreservation. In: J.H. Dodds (Ed). In vitro Methods for Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources, pp. 41–70. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, T., D.P. De Vries, G.W.H. Welles & J.A.M. Scheurink, 1977. Hybrid Tea-rose pollen. I. Germination and storage. Euphytica 26: 721–728.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marchant, R., Power, J.B., Davey, M.R. et al. Cryopreservation of pollen from two rose cultivars. Euphytica 66, 235–241 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025309

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025309

Key words

Navigation