Skip to main content
Log in

The genetics of plant-virus interactions: implications for plant breeding

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Host resistance is the main means of control of plant virus diseases. This paper reviews the genetics of resistance and matching virulence. Theoretical models of basic compatibility between plant species and their viruses, and of resistance, are described and used to predict features of resistance genetics, and mechanisms. These predictions are compared with a survey of known examples of resistance.

Resistance is mainly controlled at a single genetic locus, although more complex systems are known. About half of the resistance alleles studied were dominant, the remainder were either incompletely dominant or recessive. Doubt is cast on the reliability of assessing resistance genotypes (numbers of loci and dominace relationships) from ‘distant’ phenotypic measurements such as symptom severity or plant growth. A model is proposed to reconcile apparent inconsistencies between genotype and phenotype.

Dominant resistance alleles are strongly associated with virus localising mechanisms normally involving local lesions. Incompletely dominant and recessive alleles allow spread of the virus, but inhibit multiplication or symptom development. Fully recessive alleles may be associated with complete immunity.

Most resistance genes in the survey had been overcome by virulent virus isolates with dominant localising resistance alleles especially vulnerable. Comparatively few resistance genes have proved exceptionally durable. Acquisition of virulence can be associated with loss of general pathogenic fitness, but in some cases this can be restored by further selection of the virus in resistant hosts.

Virulence/avirulence determinants have been mapped to individual base changes in different functional regions of the viral genome. A virus may contain several virulence determinants and may develop a stable gene-for-gene relationship with a host having several resistance genes. It may be possible to design robust, oligogenic resistance systems which will be difficult for the virus to overcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bald, J.G. & T.W., Tinsley, 1967. A quasi-genetic model for plant virus host ranges. II. Differentiation between host ranges. Virology 32: 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, H. & B.D., Harrison, 1984. Expression of genes for resistance to potato virus Y in potato plants and protoplasts. Ann. Appl. Biol. 105: 539–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, V.L. & P., Palukaitis, 1992. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the movement genes of resistance breaking strains of tomato mosaic virus. J. Gen. Virol. 73: 165–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheo, P.C., 1970. Subliminal infection of cotton by tobacco mosaic virus. Phytopathology 60: 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R.H., S., Finch, K., Phelps & A.R., Thompson, 1991. Possible impact of global warming on cabbage root fly (Delia radicum) activity in the UK. Ann. Appl. Biol. 118: 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crute, I.R. & J.M., Norwood, 1986. Gene-dosage effects on the relationship betweenBremia lactucae (downy mildew) andLactuca sativa (lettuce): the relevance to a mechanistic under-standing of host-parasite specificity. Physiol. Molec. Plant Pathol. 29: 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csillery, G., I., Tobias & J., Rusko, 1983. A new pepper strain of tomato mosaic virus. Acta Phytopathol. Acad. Sci. Hung. 18: 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culver, J.N. & W.O., Dawson, 1989. Point mutations in the coat protein gene of tobacco mosaic virus induce hypersensitivity inNicotiana sylvestris. Mol. Plant-Microbe Inter. 2: 209–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, K.L., 1984. Resistance to bean common mosaic virus inPhaseolus vulgaris L. PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, UK.

  • Drijfhout, E., 1978. Genetic interaction betweenPhaseolus vulgaris and bean common mosaic virus with implications for strain identification and breeding for resistance. Agric. Res. Rep. Wageningen 872: 1–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, R.S.S., 1985. Host range control and non-host immunity to viruses. In: R.S.S., Fraser (Ed.), Mechanisms of Resistance to Plant Diseases, pp. 13–28. Nijhoff/Junk, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, R.S.S., 1986. Genes for resistance to plant viruses. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 3: 257–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, R.S.S., 1988. Virus recognition and pathogenicity: implications for resistance mechanisms and breeding. Pestic. Sci. 23: 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, R.S.S., 1990. The genetics of resistance to plant viruses. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 28: 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, R.S.S. & A., Gerwitz, 1987. The genetics of resistance and virulence in plant virus disease. In: P.R., Day & G.J., Jellis (Eds.), Genetics and Plant Pathogenesis, pp. 33–44. Black-well Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, R.S.S., A., Gerwitz & G.E.L., Morris, 1986. Multiple regression analysis of the relationships between tobacco mosaic virus multiplication, the severity of mosaic symptoms, and the growth of tobacco and tomato. Physiol. Molec. Plant Pathol. 29: 239–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, R.S.S. & S.A.R., Loughlin, 1980. Resistance to tobacco mosaic virus in tomato: effects of theTm-1 gene on virus multiplication. J. Gen. Virol. 48: 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, R.S.S. & S.A.R., Loughlin, 1982. Effects of temperature on theTm-1 gene for resistance in tobacco mosaic virus in tomato. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 20: 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, D.W. & B.G., Rolfe, 1990. Working models of specific recognition in plant-microbe interactions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 28: 365–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldbach, R., R., Eggen, C.de, Jager, A.van, Kammen, J.van, Lent, G., Rezelman & J., Wellink, 1990. Genetic organization, evolution and expression of plant viral RNA genomes. In: R.S.S., Fraser (Ed.), Recognition and Response in Plant-Virus Interations, pp. 147–162. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R.J. & K.W., Buck, 1990. Complete replication of a eukaryotic virus RNA in vitro by a purified RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Cell 63: 363–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, F.O., 1938. Inheritance of resistance to tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco. Phytopathology 28: 553–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A.T., 1990. Breeding for resistance to virus vectors. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Pests and Diseases 3: 935–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A.T. & P.L., Catherall, 1970. The relationship between growth rate and the expression of tolerance to barley yellow dwarf virus in barley. Ann. Appl. Biol. 65: 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacser, H. & J.A., Burns, 1981. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97: 639–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenné, J.M. & D., Wood, 1991. Plant diseases and the use of wild germplasm. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 29: 35–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louie, R., W.R., Findley, J.K., Knoke & M.D., McMullen, 1991. Genetic basis of resistance to five maize dwarf mosaic virus strains. Crop Sci. 31: 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, M.D. & R., Louie, 1989. The linkage of molecular markers to a gene controlling the symptom response in maize to maize dwarf mosaic virus. Molec. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2: 309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meshi, T., F., Motoyoshi, A., Adachi, Y., Watanabe, N., Takamatsu & Y., Okada, 1988. Two concomitant base substitutions in the putative replicase genes of tobacco mosaic virus confer the ability to overcome the effects of a tomato resistance gene,Tm-1, EMBO J. 7: 1575–1522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meshi, T., F., Motoyoshi, T., Maeda, S., Yoshiwoka, H., Watanabe & Y., Okada, 1989. Mutations in the tobacco mosaic virus 30-kD protein gene overcomeTm2 resistance in tomato. Plant Cell 1: 515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundry, K.-W., W., Schaible, M., Ellwart-Tschürtz, H., Nitschko & C., Hapke, 1990. Hypersensitivity to tobacco mosaic virus inN′-gene hosts: which viral genes are involved? In: R.S.S., Fraser (Ed.), Recognition and Response in Plant-Virus Interactions, pp. 345–359. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murant, A.F., C.E., Taylor & J., Chambers, 1968. Properties, relationships and transmission of a strain of raspberry ringspot virus infecting raspberry cultivars immune to the common Scottish strain. Ann. Appl. Biol. 61: 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.S., P.A., Powell & R.N., Beachy, 1990. Coat-protein mediated protection against virus infection. In: R.S.S., Fraser (Ed.), Recognition and Response in Plant-Virus Interactions, pp. 427–442. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishiguchi, M. & F., Motoyoshi, 1987. Resistance mechanisms of tobacco mosaic virus strains in tomato and tobacco. In: D., Evered & S., Harnett (Eds.), Plant Resistance to Viruses, pp. 38–56. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehu, E., R.W., Gibson, M.G.K., Jones & A., Karp, 1990. Studies on the genetic basis of resistance to potato leaf roll virus, potato virus Y and potato virus X inSolanum brevidens using somatic hybrids ofSolanum brevidens andSolanum tuberosum. Plant Science 69: 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, J., 1972. Strain-genotype interaction of tobacco mosaic virus in tomato. Ann. Appl. Biol. 71: 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, J., J.T., Fletcher & J.H., Hawkins, 1970. The establishment of a new strain of tobacco mosaic virus resulting from the use of resistant varieties of tomato. Ann. Appl. Biol 65: 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roane, C.W., S.A., Tolin & H.S., Aycock, 1989. Genetics of reaction to maize dwarf mosaic virus strain A in several maize inbred lines. Phytopathology 79: 1364–1368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkranz, E. & G.E., Scott, 1984. Determination of the number of genes for resistance to maize dwarf mosaic virus strain A in five corn inbred lines. Phytopathology 74: 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scowcroft, W.R. & P.J., Larkin, 1982. Somaclonal variation: a new option for plant improvement. In: I.K., Varil, W.R., Scowcroft & K.J., Frey (Eds.), Plant Improvement and Somatic Cell Genetics, pp. 159–178. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzinski, M.A. & M., Zaitlin, 1982. Tobacco mosaic virus replication in resistant and susceptible plants: in some resistant species virus is confined to a small number of initially infected cells. Virology 121: 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, I., R.S.S., Fraser & A., Gerwitz, 1989. The gene-for-gene relationship betweenCapsicum annuum L. and tobacco mosaic virus: effects on virus multiplication, ethylene synthesis and accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 35: 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyoda, H., K., Chatani, Y., Matsuda & S., Ouchi, 1989. Multiplication of tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco callus tissues and in vitro selection for viral disease resistance. Plant Cell Rep. 8: 433–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, L.A., J.L., Sherwood, J.A.M., Rezende & U., Melcher, 1990. Examination of mechanisms of cross protection in non-transgenic plants. In: R.S.S., Fraser (Ed.), Recognition and Response in Plant-Virus Interactions, pp. 415–426. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderplank, J.E., 1984. Disease Resistance in Plants. Second Edition. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaya, J., M., Yoshioka, T., Meshi, Y., Okada & T., Ohno, 1988. Cross protection in transgenic tobacco plants expressing a mild strain of tobacco mosaic virus. Mol. Gen. Genet. 215: 173–175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fraser, R.S.S. The genetics of plant-virus interactions: implications for plant breeding. Euphytica 63, 175–185 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023922

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023922

Key words

Navigation