Skip to main content
Log in

Characterisation of Cannabis accessions with regard to cannabinoid content in relation to other plant characters

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ninety seven Cannabis accessions were evaluated for cannabinoid content and non-chemical plant characters. Variation within populations for cannabinoid content, and consistency of chemical characters at the population level were investigated. The relationship between chemical and other plant characters was very limited. Leaflet width and phenological data can be used for a rough prediction of the chemical phenotype on a population level. Various combinations of cannabinoid content and other economic plant characters were observed, thus a breeding programme will not be hampered by strict linkage. For a selection programme a direct analysis of cannabinoids will be inevitable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous, 1986. Gemeinschaftsverfahren für die mengenmässige Bestimmung des delta-9-the in bestimmten Hanfsorten. Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr. L 48: 27–30.

  • Avico, U. & P., Zuccaro, 1984. Contenuto di delta-9-THC in varieta' europee di Cannabis sativa. Societa' Agricola e Forestale, Quaderni di Ricerca 2: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredemann, G., Fr., Schwanitz & R., von, Sengbusch, 1957. Aufgaben und Möglichkeiten der modernen Hanfzüchtung mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Problems der Züchtung haschischarmer oder-freier Hanfsorten. Technical Bulletin 4: 1–15, Max-Planck-Institut für Züchtungsforschung, Hamburg-Volksdorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenneisen, R. & T., Kessler, 1987. Psychotrope Drogen: V. Die Variabilität der Cannabinoidführung von Cannabispflanzen aus Schweizer Kulturen in Abhängigkeit von genetischen und ökologischen Faktoren. Pharm. Acta Helv. 62, Nr. 5–6: 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, J.M., 1975. Fiber Crops. University of Florida Press, Gainesville. FL., USA, pp 46–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, P.S., E.S., Keith, C.W., Waller, O., Guerrero, N.J., Doorenbos & M.W., Quimby, 1971. Mississippi-grown Cannabis sativa L.: preliminary observation on chemical definition of phenotype and variations in tetrahydrocannabinol content versus age, sex, and plant part. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 60: 1246–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, G. & M.R., Paris, 1979. Le chanvre papetier (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivé en France: Le point sur les constituants. Plant Med. Phytother. 13: 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorshkova, L.M., G.I. Senchenko & V.G. Virovets, 1988. [Method of evaluating hemp plants for content of cannabinoid compounds] (in Russian). Referativnyi Zhurnal 12.65.322.

  • Gower, J.C., 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27: 857–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, H.A., Y.M. El, Kheir & M.I., Mohamed, 1986. Stability of Cannabis preparations on storage. Fitoterapia 57: 235–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, J.K., J.C., Turner & P.G., Mahlberg, 1980. Cannabinoid content of individual plant organs from different geographical strains of Cannabis sativa L. Journal of Natural Products 43: 112–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krejci, Z., 1970. Changes with maturation in the amounts of biologically interesting substances of Cannabis. In: C.R.B., Joyce & S.H., Curry (Eds). The Botany & Chemistry of Cannabis, J. & A. Churchill London. p. 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, E.P.M., de & L.J.M., van, Soest, 1992. The CPRO Cannabis collection. Euphytica 62: 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murari, G., S., Lombardi, A.M., Puccini & R., de, Sanctis, 1983. Influence of environmental conditions on tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC) in different cultivars of Cannabis sativa L.. Fitoterapia 54: 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petri, G., P., Oroszlan & L., Fridvalszky, 1988. Histochemical detection of hemp trichomes and their correlation with the THG content. Acta Biologica Hungarica 39: 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quimby, M.W., N.J., Doorenbos, C.E., Turner & A., Masoud, 1973. Mississippi-Grown Marihuana-Cannabis sativa Cultivation and observed Morphological Variations. Economic botany 27: 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultes, R.E., 1970. Random thoughts and queries on the botany of Cannabis. In: C.R.B., Joyce & S.H., Curry (Eds), The Botany & Chemistry of Cannabis, J. & A. Churchill-London. p. 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultes, R.E., W.M. Klein, T. Plowman & T.E. Lockwood, 1974. Cannabis: an example of taxonomic neglect. In: Botanical Museum Leaflets Harvard University. 23: 337–367.

  • Small, E., P., Jui & L.P., Lefkovitch, 1976. A numerical taxonomic analysis of Cannabis with special reference to species delimitation. Systematic Botany, 1: 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, E. & H.D., Beckstead, 1973. Common cannabinoid phenotypes in 350 stocks of Cannabis. Lloydia 36: 144–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, E. & A., Cronquist, 1976. A practical and natural taxonomy for Cannabis. Taxon 25: 405–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.C., J.K., Hemphill & P.G., Mahlberg, 1978. Cannabinoid composition and gland distribution in clones of Cannabis sativa L. (Cannabaceae). Bulletin on Narcotics 30: 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virovets, V.G., L.M., Gorshkova, L.T., Rumyantseva & I.M., Laiko, 1987. [Comparative study of a hemp collection in the Poles'e zone of the Ukrainian SSR] (In Russian). Genetike i Selektsii 113: 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Meijer, E.P.M., van der Kamp, H.J. & van Eeuwijk, F.A. Characterisation of Cannabis accessions with regard to cannabinoid content in relation to other plant characters. Euphytica 62, 187–200 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041753

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041753

Key words

Navigation