Skip to main content
Log in

Variation and inheritance of response to acetochlor among maize inbred lines and hybrids

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The variation of response to acetochlor was studied in a two-year experiment carried out by subjecting 18 maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines to three herbicide rates (0, 2.5 and 5 l a.i./ha). In both years some inbred lines consistently exhibited an evident susceptibility, with symptoms consisting of the seedling curling up below the soil surface and causing impaired field emergence. The results were poor plant density and lower grain yield in comparison to control. In contrast, other lines showed a satisfactory level of tolerance.

Then, to gather data on the inheritance of response to acetochlor, four tolerant inbreds (T) and four susceptible inbreds (S) were crossed to obtain four T×T, four S×S, four S×T and the corresponding four T×S two-way hybrids. These hybrids were studied together with parental lines by applying the same herbicide rates used in the previous trial. The S×S hybrids showed susceptibility to the herbicide and the T×T were tolerant, whereas the S×T and the T× S hybrids showed a tolerance very close to that of the T×T hybrids. No difference was found between S×T and the corresponding T×S hybrids as to herbicide response. On average, the 16 hybrids exhibited greater tolerance than the eight parental lines, with each hybrid group being more tolerant than its parental line group. These results indicate that tolerance to acetochlor is prevailingly dominant, that action of extranuclear genes should be ruled out, and that the level of plant vigour can affect herbicide reactiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous, 1985. A look at world pesticide market. Farm Chem. 148, 9: 26–34.

  • Burt B.W., 1976. Factors affecting thiocarbamate injury to corn. II. Soil incorporation, seed placement, cultivar, leaching and breakdown. Weed Sci. 24: 327–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis T.R. & A.S. Hamill, 1980. Inheritance of maize tolerance to alachlor. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60: 1045–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grogan C.O., F.E. Emory & R.D. Palmer, 1963. Inheritance of susceptibility of a line of maize to simazine and atrazine. Crop Sci. 3: 451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horny, P.E., W.F. Meggitt & M. Barret, 1983. The effect of soil applied herbicides on corn roots and shoots. Proc. North Central Weed Control Conf. 104.

  • Jugenheimer R.W., F.W. Slife & R.F. Fuelleman, 1948. Stalk lodging in inbred lines of corn caused by 2,4-D spray during flowering. North Central Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 3: 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komives, V., T. Komives & F. Dutka, 1984. Influence of herbicides on the glutathione — S — transferase level of maize seedlings. (In Hungarian, English summary). Acta Biochim. et Bioph. Acad. Scient. 19, 1/2, p. 130.

  • Landi P., P. Catizone & S. Conti, 1981. Comportamento differenziale di linee e ibridi di mais sottoposti a trattamenti diserbanti con Eradicane 6E (EPTC+R 25788). Rivista di Agronomia 15, 2: 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt J.R.C. & D. Penner, 1978. Protection of corn (Zea mays) from acetoanilide herbicidal injury with the antidote R-25788. Weed Sci. 26: 653–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng E.R. & F.W. Slife, 1948. Differential seedling response of corn inbred lines to 2,4-D treatment. Fifth North Central Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 8: 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn L.B., 1980. Performance of acetochlor in corn and potatoes in the northeastern United States. Proc. Northeastern Weed Sci. Soc. 34: 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklos D., 1981. Comparative analysis of acetochlor and metolachlor based herbicides in the weed control of maize. I. (In Hungarian, English summary). Novenytermeles 30, 2: 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narsaiah B.D. & R.G. Harvey, 1977. Differential responses of corn inbreds and hybrids to alachlor. Crop Sci. 17: 657–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poneleit C.G., 1974. Review of thiocarbamate herbicide research and genetic resistance studies. Proc. Annual Corn and Sorghum Res. Conf. 29: 142–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reick C.E. & T.H. Wright, 1973. Differential butylate injury to corn hybrids. Weed Sci. 21: 194–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagaral E.C. & C.L. Foy, 1982. Responses of several corn (Zea mays L.) cultivars and weed species to EPTC with or without antidote R-25788. Weed Sci. 30: 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A.J. & M. Knott, 1974. A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 30, 3: 507–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkins G.S., L.J. Moshier & O.G. Russ, 1980. Influence of acetamide herbicide applications on efficacy of the protectant CGA-43089 in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Sci. 28: 646–649.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landi, P., Frascaroli, E. & Catizone, P. Variation and inheritance of response to acetochlor among maize inbred lines and hybrids. Euphytica 45, 131–137 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00033280

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00033280

Key words

Navigation