Skip to main content
Log in

Stable resistance in barley to Pyrenophora teres f. teres isolates from the Nordic-Baltic region after increase on standard host genotypes

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Results from tests of a mixture of Finnish net blotch, Pyrenophora teres Drechs. f. teres Smedeg., isolates on a differential series of barley seedlings, comprising 17genotypes, indicated that patterns of infection response (IR)and percentage leaf area damaged (PLAD) were unaffected by differences in seedling size. Variation of the concentration of inoculum between 1,250 conidia ml-1 and 20,000 conidia ml-1 produced similar patterns of IR and PLAD on the differential series. IR and PLAD scored on the second seedling leaf differentiated resistance to P. teres f. teresamong the genotypes better than on the first seedling leaf. Ina second experiment, 120 single-spore P. teres f. teres isolates from Finland, Sweden, Norway, Latvia, Estonia and Ireland were used in tests conducted in the greenhouse to differentiate them in terms of virulence reaction on seedlings of six differential barley genotypes. Each isolate was tested directly following isolation from the leaf material and after having passaged each through barley cvs. Arve or Pohto, to produce 360 isolates in total. Virulence of the isolates differed significantly on the members of the differential series, but differences associated with country of origin and passaging, and interactions, were small. It is concluded that little variation between virulence of P. teres f. teres isolates is evident over a large geographic area, incorporating Nordic and Baltic countries, and Ireland. Barley genotype response to P. teres f. teres appeared to be of more significance than relative virulence of the pathogen isolates. This could simplify breeding barley for improved resistance to this phytopathogen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Finlay, K.W. & G.N. Wilkinson, 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust J Agri Res 14: 742–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalli, M. & J. Robinson, 1997. Effect of host barley cultivar on virulence of Drechslera teres. J Appl Genet 38B: 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W.C., 1971. An illustrated series of assessment keys for plant diseases: their preparation and usage. Can Plant Disease Survey 51: 39–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, R., 1996. A virulence survey of Swedish net blotch isolates (Drechslera teres) and identification of resistant barley lines. In: A. Slinkard, G. Scoles & B. Rossnagel (Eds.), Proceedings of V International Oat Conference & VII International Barley Genetics Symposium, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Jul. 30–Aug. 6, 1996. pp. 732–734.

  • Jonsson, R., T. Bryngelsson & M. Gustafsson, 1997. Virulence studies of Swedish net blotch isolates (Drechslera teres) and classification of resistant barley lines. Euphytica 94: 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, T.N., 1969. Inheritance of resistance to net blotch in barley. I. Factors affecting the penetrance and expressivity of gene(s) conditioning host resistance. Can J Genet Cytol 11: 587–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell, R.C., R.J. Freund & P.C. Spector, 1991. SAS System for Linear Models, Third Edition, Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc., 329 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell, R.C., G.A. Milliken, W.W. Stroup & R.D. Wolfinger, 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models, Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc., 633 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osbourn, A.E., P.R. Scot & C.E. Caten, 1986. The effects of passaging on the adaptation of Septoria nodorum to wheat and barley. Plant Path 35: 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen, S., M. Jalli, K. Kammiovirta & R. Karjalainen, 1996. Genetic variation in Drechslera teres populations as indicated by RAPD markers. Ann Appl Biol 128: 465–477.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. & M. Jalli, 1996. Diversity among Finnish net blotch isolates and resistance in barley. Euphytica 92: 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. & M. Jalli, 1997. Quantitative resistance to Pyrenophora teres in six Nordic spring barley accessions. Euphytica 94: 201–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Fourth Edition, Volume 2, Cary, NC, 1686 pp.

  • Sato, K. & K. Takeda, 1993. Pathogenic variation of Pyrenophora teres isolates collected from Japanese and Canadian spring barley. Bull Res Inst Bioresour Okayama Univ 1: 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipton, W.A., T.N. Khan & W.J.R. Boyd, 1973. Net blotch of barley. Rev of Plant Pathol 52: 269–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffenson, B.J. & R.K. Webster, 1992. Pathotype diversity of Pyrenophora teres f. teres on barley. Phytopathology 2: 170–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekauz, A., 1985. A numerical scale to classify reactions of barley to Pyrenophora teres. Can J Plant Pathol 7: 181–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekauz, A., 1990. Characterization and distribution of pathogenic variation in Pyrenophora teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata from western Canada. Can J Plant Path 12: 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tottman, D.R. & R.J. Makepeace, 1979. An explanation of the decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations. Ann Appl Biol 93: 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jalli, M., Robinson, J. Stable resistance in barley to Pyrenophora teres f. teres isolates from the Nordic-Baltic region after increase on standard host genotypes. Euphytica 113, 71–77 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003912825455

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003912825455

Navigation