Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing and Monitoring the Health of Western Rangeland Watersheds

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most important function of watersheds in the western U.S. is the capacity to retain soil and water, thereby providing stability in hydrologic head and minimizing stream sediment loads. Long-term soil and water retention varies directly with vegetation cover. Data on ground cover and plant species composition were collected from 129 sites in the Rio Grande drainage of south-central New Mexico. This area was previously assessed by classification of Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometry (AVHRR) imagery. The classification of irreversibly degraded sites failed to identify most of the severely degraded sites based on size of bare patches and 35% of the sites classified as degraded were healthy based on mean bare patch size and vegetation cover. Previous research showed that an index of unvegetated soil (bare patch size and percent of ground without vegetative cover) was the most robust indicator of the soil and water retention function. Although the regression of mean bare patch size on percent bare ground was significant (p < 0.001), percent bare ground accounted for only 11% of the variability in bare patch size. Therefore bare patch size cannot be estimated from data on percent bare ground derived from remote sensing. At sites with less than 25% grass cover, and on sites with more than 15% shrub cover, there were significant relationships between percent bare soil and mean bare patch size (p < 0.05). Several other indicators of ecosystem health were related to mean bare patch size: perennial plant species richness (r = 0.6, p < 0.0001), percent cover of increaser species (r = 0.5, p < 0.0001) and percent cover of forage useable by livestock (r = 0.62, p < 0.0001). There was no relationship between bare patch size and cover of species that are toxic to livestock. In order to assess the ability of western rangeland watersheds to retain soil and water using remote sensing, it will be necessary to detect and estimate sizes of bare patches ranging between at least 0.5 m in diameter to several meters in diameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buffington, L.C. and Herbel, C.H.: 1965, ‘Vegetational changes on a semidesert grassland range from 1858 to 1963’ Ecological Monographs 35, 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canfield, R.H.: 1941, ‘Application of the line interception method in sampling range vegetation’ Journal of Forestry 39, 388–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dregne, H.E.: 1983, ‘Desertification of Arid LandsHarwood Academic Publishers, London. 242 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSoyza, A.G., Whitford,W.G. and Herrick, J.E.: 1997, ‘Sensitivity testing of indicators of ecosystem health’ Ecosystem Health 3, 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSoyza, A.G., Whitford, W.G., Herrick, J.E., Van Zee, J.W. and Havstad, K.M.: 1998, ‘Early warning indicators of desertification: examples of tests in the Chihuahuan Desert’ Journal of Arid Environments 39, 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eve, M.D., Whitford, W.G. and Havstad, K.M.: 1999, ‘Applying satellite imagery to triage assessment of ecosystem health’ Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 54, 205–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff, B.F., Bent, G.C. and Hart, G.E.: 1993, ‘Erosion response of a disturbed sagebrush steppe hillslope’ Journal of Environmental Quality 22, 698–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, J.E., Whitford, W.G., DeSoyza, A.G., Van Zee, J., Havstad, K.M., Seybold, C.A. and Walton, M.: 1999, ‘Soil aggregate stability kit for field-based soil quality and rangeland health evaluations’ Catenain press.

  • Johnson, A.R., Turner, S.J., Whitford, W.G., Van Zee, J.W., DeSoyza, A.G., Neale, A.C., Kay, F. and Eve, M. D.: in review, ‘Accuracy and error in classified AVHRR imagery for regional management of arid lands’ Ecological Applications.

  • Ludwig, J.A.: 1987, ‘Primary productivity in arid lands: myths and reality’ Journal of Arid Environments 13, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council: 1994, Rangeland Health: New Methods to Classify, Inventory, and Monitor RangelandsNational Academy Press, 180 pp.

  • Peters, A.J., Eve, M.D., Holt, E.H. and Whitford, W.G.: 1997, ‘Analysis of desert plant community growth patterns with high temporal resolution satellite spectra’ Journal of Applied Ecology 34, 418–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, E.L.: 1986, ‘Wind erosion control’ Climatic Change 9, 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S.J., Johnson, A.R., Whitford, W.G., de Soyza, A.G. and Van Zee, J.W.: in press, ‘Multivariate characterization of perennial vegetation in the northern Chihuahuan Desert’ Journal of Arid Environments.

  • Whitford, W.G., DeSoyza, A.G., Van Zee, J.W., Herrick, J.E. and Havstad, K.M.: 1998, ‘Vegetation, soil, and animal indicators of rangeland health’ Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 51, 179–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desoyza, A.G., Whitford, W.G., Turner, S.J. et al. Assessing and Monitoring the Health of Western Rangeland Watersheds. Environ Monit Assess 64, 153–166 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006423708707

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006423708707

Navigation