Skip to main content
Log in

EMAP Design and River Reach File 3 (RF3) as a Sample Frame in the Central Valley, California

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Central Valley, California, R-EMAP project assessed the effects of highly modified, agriculturally dominated landuse on the aquatic resources of the lower portion of the Central Valley watersheds. The focus of this paper is to assess the utility of the EMAP design and the River Reach File version 3 (RF3) 1:100,000 scale Digital Line Graph (DLG) as a sampling frame. The study area is 34,099 mi2(88,316 km2) and comprises the lower reaches of the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River watersheds to the 1000 ft. (305 m) elevation. Sampling sites are selected using a tessellation stratified design to represent the two main populations of interest: natural streams and man-made waterways. Sites are selected to represent 13,226 miles of streams and sloughs, and 14,648 miles of irrigation canals, ditches and drains. To achieve an approximately equal sample size across stream orders and basins, the sample design was weighted by Strahler order categories to ensure sampling occurred in the higher order streams. Based on office and field reconnaissance, the study provided information on the quality of RF3 as a sampling frame. Site selection using RF3 had a success rate of approximately 44%. The RF3 database has an error rate of approximately 7%. When human influence factors were included, the error rate increased to 16%. There was an 11% error rate when selecting sites for natural streams, and approximately a 14% error rate for man-made waterways. The reconnaissance information indicated that presence or absence of irrigation ditches and return drains depends on changing agricultural uses. Some of the error in the RF3 for natural streams and man-made waterways can be attributed to rapid urban expansion, especially in the San Joaquin basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hall, R.K., Husby, P., Wolinsky, G., Hansen, O. and Mares, M.: 1998, ‘Site access and sample frame issues for R-EMAP CentralValley, California, stream assessment’ Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 15, 357–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B. et al.: 1986a, Final Report on Development and Preliminary Tests of Indices of Biotic Integrity for CaliforniaFinal Report to the U.S. EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle, P.B. et al.: 1986b, Evaluating the Condition of California's Streams using Indices of Biotic Integrity: Evidence for Continuing Decline, Technical Completion Report W-659, Water Resources Center, UC-Davis, Davis, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiki, M.K.: 1984, ‘Environmental Conditions and Fish Faunas in Low Elevation Rivers on the Irrigated San Joaquin Valley Floor, California’ California Department of Fish & Game 70(3), 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Don L., Jr. and Olsen, Anthony R.: 1999 submitted, ‘spatially restricted surveys over time for aquatic resources’ Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics.

  • Stevens, Don L., Jr.: 1997, ‘Variable density grid-based sampling designs for continuous spatial populations’ Environmetrics167–95.

  • SWRCB.: 1991, California Inland Surface Waters Plan: Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters of CaliforniaCalifornia State Water Resources Control Board, 91–13 WQ, Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, R.K., Olsen, A., Stevens, D. et al. EMAP Design and River Reach File 3 (RF3) as a Sample Frame in the Central Valley, California. Environ Monit Assess 64, 69–80 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006494602405

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006494602405

Keywords

Navigation