Abstract
Even though propeller anemometers are found to give outputs which deviate from the desired cosine relationship by an amount which varies with wind speed, their overall performance is consistent with many atmospheric requirements. Their output per unit wind speed is a function of angle of attack, such that when used as sensors of the vertical or horizontal cross-wind components in the atmosphere, calibration factors may differ by as much as 30 % from those obtained in a normal wind-tunnel calibration procedure (in which wind velocity is parallel to the anemometer shaft). These characteristics are sufficiently important that great care should be taken in using these devices inu-v-w orthogonal arrays.
For use in eddy-correlation equipment, it appears that it is best to vane-mount the horizontal sensor to ensure that the appropriate calibration factor is employed.
The response lengths of propeller anemometers also vary with angle of attack. Nearθ=0 °, the axially-referred response length appears to depend linearly on cosθ, but nearθ=90 ° a dependence on cos1/2 θ fits the data. No strong effect of wind speed is found.
Due to their limited response characteristics, these anemometers give rise to underestimates of the Reynolds stress measured near the surface. The extent of the loss is about 8 % when anemometers in good condition are employed at a height of 5m. Operation at a greater height would allow this error to be reduced. After exposure in the atmosphere for some time, the anemometers tend to respond more slowly and greater losses (of the order 25 %) can occur. Some improvement in performance is possible by the choice of a suitable spatial separation of the sensors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Camp, D. W., Turner, R. E., and Gilchrist, L. P.: 1970, ‘Response Tests on Cup, Vane and Propeller Wind Sensors’,J. Geophys. Res. 75, 5265–5269.
Clink, W. L.: 1971, “Comment on ‘Response Tests of Cup, Vane and Propeller Wind Sensors’ by Camp, D. W., Turner, R. E., and Gilchrist, L. P.”,J. Geophys. Res. 76, 2902.
Cramer, H. E., Record, F. A., and Tillman, J. E.: 1962,Studies of the Spectra of the Vertical Fluxes of Momentum. Heat and Moisture in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Mass. Inst. of Technology Final Report under Contract Da-26-039-SC-80209, 112 pp.
Dyer, A. J. and Hicks, B. B.: 1972, ‘The Spatial Variability of Eddy Fluxes in the Constant Flux Layer’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 98, 206–212.
Dyer, A. J., Hicks, B. B., and King, K. M.: 1967, ‘The Fluxatron - A Revised Approach to the Measurement of Eddy Fluxes in the Lower Atmosphere’,J. Appl. Meteor. 6, 408–413.
Dyer, A. J., Hicks, B. B., and Sitaraman, V.: 1970, ‘Minimizing the Levelling Error in Reynolds Stress Measurement by Filtering’,J. Appl. Meteor. 9, 532–534.
Hicks, B. B.: 1970, ‘The Measurement of Atmospheric Fluxes near the Surface: A Generalized Approach’,J. Appl. Meteor. 9, 386–388.
Kaimal, J. C. and Haugen, D. A.: 1969, ‘Some Errors in the Measurement of Reynolds Stress’,J. Appl. Meteor. 8, 460–462.
McDonald, J. W.: 1972,Fluxatron and Sonic Anemometer Measurements of Momentum Flux at a Height of 4 Metres in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, M. Sc. Thesis presented to the Institute of Oceanography, U.B.C., Canada, 68 pp.
Miyake, M., Stewart, R. W., and Burling, R. W.: 1970, ‘Spectra and Cospectra of Turbulence over Water’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 96, 138–143.
Smith, S. D.: 1970, ‘Thrust-Anemometer Measurements of Wind Turbulence, Reynolds Stress, and Drag Coefficient over the Sea’,J. Geophys. Res. 75, 6758–6770.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hicks, B.B. Propeller anemometers as sensors of atmospheric turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 3, 214–228 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033920
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033920