Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of satellite and terrestrial gravity data

  • Published:
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The integral mean values of gravity on the surface W=W0, obtained from satellite observations with the use of harmonic coefficients[3, 7] and from terrestrial gravity measurements[12], are compared. The squares and products of the harmonic coefficients were neglected, with the exception of [J (0)2 ]2, which was taken into account. The Potsdam correction and the geocentric constant are being discussed. The paper ties up with[13–15] and the symbols used are the same. The given problem was treated, e.g., in[2, 4, 6, 8–10]; in the present paper the values of gravity are compared directly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. И. Д. Жонголович: Внещнее гравитационное поле Земли и Фундаменталъные постоянные, связанные с ним. Тр. ИТА, вып. Ш, М.–Л. 1952.

  2. A. Bjerhammar: On a Coalescent World Geodetic System. ETL, Res. Inst. Geod. Sci., Alexandria 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Geodetic Parameters for a 1966 Smithsonian Institution Standard Earth. SAO Sp. Rep. 200, Cambridge 1966.

  4. E. Groten: Ein Vergleich von Gravimetermessungen mit Satellitenbeobachtungsergebnissen. Z. f. Geoph., 34 (1968), 163.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. W. Hobson: The Theory of Spherical and Ellipsoidal Harmonics. Univ. Press, Cambridge 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. M. Kaula: Tests and Combinations of Satellite Determinations of the Gravity Field with Gravimetry. JGR, 71 (1966), 5303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Kozai: New Determination of Zonal Harmonics Coefficients of the Earth's Gravitational Potential. SAO Sp. Rep. 165, Cambridge 1964.

  8. R. H. Rapp: The Geopotential to (14, 14) from a Combination of Satellite and Gravimetric Data. Bull. géod., No 91 (1969), 47.

  9. R. H. Rapp: Analytical and Numerical Differences between two Methods for the Combination of Gravimetric and Satellite Data. Boll. di Geof. Teor. ed Appl., XI (1969), 108.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. H. Rapp: Gravitational Potential of the Earth Determined from a Combination of Satellite, Observed, and Model Anomalies. JGR, 73 (1968), 6555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Tallqvist: Tafeln der abgeleiteten und zugeordneten Kugelfunktionen erster Art. Acta Soc. Sci. Fennicae, XXXIII (1908), No 9.

  12. U. A. Uotila: Harmonic Analysis of World-wide Gravity Material. Isost. Inst. IAG Publ. 39, Helsinki 1962.

  13. M. Burša: Geopotential and Gravity on External Surfaces as Derived from Satellite Observations. Studia geoph. et geod., 14 (1970), 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Burša: Global Geoid Sections Determined by Satellite Orbit Dynamics. Studia geoph. et geod., 14 (1970), 274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Burša: The Differences in Structure of the Gravity Field and the Figure of the Earth in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Studia geoph. et geod., 14 (1970), 363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burša, M. Comparison of satellite and terrestrial gravity data. Stud Geophys Geod 15, 7–23 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01613601

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01613601

Keywords

Navigation