Abstract
To understand the accumulation of inorganic mercury and methylmercury at the base of the estuarine food chain, phytoplankton (Thalassiosira weissflogii) uptake and mercury speciation experiments were conducted. Complexation of methylmercury as methylmercury-bisulfide decreased the phytoplankton uptake rate while the uptake rate of the methylmercury-cysteine and -thiourea complexes increased with increasing complexation by these ligands. Furthermore, our results indicated that while different ligands influenced inorganic mercury/methylmercury uptake by phytoplankton cells, the ligand complex had no major influence on either where the mercury was sequestered within the phytoplankton cell nor the assimilation efficiency of the mercury by copepods. The assimilation efficiency of inorganic mercury/methylmercury by copepods and amphipods feeding on algal cells was compared and both organisms assimilated methylmercury much more efficiently; the relative assimilation efficiency of methylmercury to inorganic mercury was 2.0 for copepods and 2.8 for amphipods. The relative assimilation is somewhat concentration dependent as experiments showed that as exposure concentration increased, a greater percentage of methylmercury was found in the cytoplasm of phytoplankton cells, resulting in a higher concentration in the copepods feeding on these cells. Additionally, food quality influenced assimilation by invertebrates. During decay of a T. weissflogii culture, which served as food for the invertebrates, copepods were increasingly less able to assimilate the methylmercury from the food, while even at advanced stages of decay, amphipods were able to assimilate mercury from their food to a high degree. Finally, fish feeding on copepods assimilated methylmercury more efficiently than inorganic mercury owing to the larger fraction of methylmercury found in the soft tissues of the copepods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloom NS & Crecelius EA (1983) Determination of mercury in seawater at sub-nanogram per liter levels. Mar. Chem. 14: 49–59
Bloom NS & Fitzgerald WF (1988) Determination of volatile mercury species at the picogram level by low temperature gas chromatography with cold-vapour atomic fluorescence detector. Anal. Chim. Acta. 208: 151–161
Clarkson TW (1990) Human health risks from methylmercury in fish. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 9: 957–961
Fitzgerald WF & Clarkson TW (1991) Mercury and monomethylmercury: Present and future concerns. Environ. Health Perspect. 96: 159–166
Harvey RH, Tuttle JH, & Bell JT (1995) Kinetics of phytoplankton decay during simulated sedimentation: Changes in biochemical composition and microbial activity under oxic and anoxic conditions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59: 3367–3377
Lindqvist O (Ed), Johansson K, Aastrup M, Andersson A, Bringmark L, Hovsenius G, Hakanson L, Iverfeldt A, Meili M & Timm B (1991) Mercury in the Swedish environment – Recent research on causes, consequences, and corrective methods: Special volume. Water Air Soil Poll. 55
Mason RP, Reinfelder JR & Morel FMM (1996) Uptake, toxicity, and trophic transfer of mercury in a coastal diatom. Environ. Sci. and Tech. 30: 1835–1845
Mason RP & Sullivan KA (1997) Mercury in Lake Michigan. Environ. Sci. and Tech. 31: 942–947
Reinfelder JR & Fisher NS (1991) The assimilation of elements by marine copepod. Science 251: 794–796
Reinfelder JR & Fisher NS (1994) Retention of elements absorbed by juvenile fish (Menidia menidia, Menidia beryllina) from zooplankton prey. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39: 1783–1789
Stumm W & Morgan JJ (1981) Aquatic Chemistry, 2nd edn. (pp 471–472). John Wiley & Sons, NY
Watras CJ & Bloom NS (1992) Mercury and methylmercury in individual zooplankton: Implications for bioaccumulation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37: 1313–1318
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lawson, N.M., Mason, R.P. Accumulation of mercury in estuarine food chains. Biogeochemistry 40, 235–247 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005959211768
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005959211768