Skip to main content
Log in

Host behaviour and its influence on foraging and acceptance by the solitary parasitoid wasp,Venturia canescens (Hym: Ichneumonidae)

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavioural interactions between the solitary koinobiont parasitoid,Venturia canescens, and two of its hosts,Plodia interpunctella andCorcyra cephalonica, were investigated.

The response of both hosts to simulated antennation using a two-haired brush was examined over instars 3 (L3) to 5 (L5). YoungP. interpunctella larvae predominantly adopted escape tactics (writhe, trash) whereas L5P. interpunctella usually froze after the stimulus was applied. L3C. cephalonica larvae were more aggressive (headrear, flick) thanP. interpunctella in response to the application of the stimulus, but olderC. cephalonica responded less aggressively than in earlier instars.

AlthoughV. canescens readily jabbed its ovipositor at both hosts after antennation,P. interpunctella was considerably more susceptible to parasitoid attack thanC. cephalonica, irrespective of size in the final (L5) instar.C. cephalonica, the larger, more aggressive host, actively resisted parasitism whereasP. interpunctella responded much more passively after parasitoid contact. Parasitoids examined and jabbed their ovipositors at dead hosts, but this behaviour was not sustained, implying that host movement stimulates parasitoid attack.

On patches containingV. canescens, L5C. cephalonica andP. interpunctella, mostP. interpunctella larvae responded by freezing after parasitoid contact.P. interpunctella that froze usually avoided parasitism, whereas larvae that attempted to escape by crawling were pursued with vigour byV. canescens and usually parasitized. Irrespective of behaviour after parasitoid contact,C. cephalonia displayed more aggressive behaviour and had much greater success in warding off parasitoid attack.

Host acceptance byV. canescens is clearly affected by the size and species of the host it attacks. The influence of host defensive behaviour is discussed in relation to the evolution of parasitoid counter-defences and oviposition strategies.

Résmé

Les intéractions, sur le plan comportemental, entre le parasitoïde solitaire koïnobionte,Venturia canescens et deux de ses hôtes,Plodia interpunctella etCorcyra cephalonica ont fait l'objet de cette étude. La réponse des deux hôtes à une exploration antennaire simulée à l'aide d'un pinceau à 2 poils différait selon qu'il s'agissait des petites larves du 3e stade ou des grosses larves du 5e stade.

En réponse à ce stimulus, les jeunes larves deP. interpunctella adoptaient principalement un comportement de fuite (en se contorsionnant ou en se débattant) alors que les larves de 3e stade deC. cephalonica se montraient plus agressives (en rejetant la tête en arrière et en donnant des coups de patte). Au stade L5, les larves deP. interpunctella s'immobilisaient après l'application du stimulus, alors que celles deC. cephalonica avaient une réponse moins agressive qu'aux stades précédents.

Alors queV. canescens enfoncait rapidement son ovipositeur dans les 2 hôtes après une exploration antennaire,P. interpunctella était nettement plus sensible à l'attaque du parasitoïde queC. cephalonica, et ce sans tenir compte de la taille du dernier stade (L5).C. cephalonica, l'hôte le plus grand et le plus agressif, résiste activement au parasitisme tandis quePlodia répond de façon beaucoup plus passive au contact du parasitoïde. Les parasitoïdes examinent les hôtes morts et y enfoncent leur ovipositeur, mais les attaques ne sont pas poursuivies et les femelles s'en désintéressent rapidement.

Sur des sites oùV. canescens est en présence de larves du 5e stade deC. cephalonica on deP. interpunctella, la plupart des larves deP. interpunctella répondaient au contact avec le parasitoïde par l'immobilité, alors que les larves deC. cephalonica adoptaient une attitude un peu plus agressive. Les larves deP. interpunctella qui s'immobilisaient échappaient habituellement au parasitisme tandis que celles qui tentaient de fuir étaient poursuivies avec vigueur par le parasitoïde et généralement parasitées. En dépit de leur comportement après le contact,C. cephalonica évitait l'attaque avec plus de succès. L'acceptation de l'hôte parV. canescens est clairement dépendante de la taille et l'espèce de l'hôte qu'il attaque. Le rôle du comportement défensif de l'hôte est discuté en relation avec l'évolution de comportement de contre-défense du parasitoïde et de ses stratégies d'oviposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, G. R. — 1990. Influence of host behavior and host size on the success of oviposition ofCotesia urabae andDolichogenidea eucalypti (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). —J. Insect Behav., 3, 733–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, A. P. — 1981. Host acceptance by parasitoids. In: Semiochemicals (D.A. Nordlund, R.L. Jones &W.J. Lewis, eds). —Wiley and Sons, London, 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askew, R. R. &Shaw, M. R. — 1986. Parasitoids communities: their size, structure, and development. In: Insect parasitoids (J. K. Waage &D. Greathead, eds). —Academic Press, London, 225–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, P., Saunders, J. A. &Waldvogel, M. — 1982. Plant-mediated variation in herbivore suitability and parasitoid fitness. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium of Insect-Plant Relationships (J. H. Visser &A. K. Minks, eds). —Pudoc, Wageningen, 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon, M., Sait, S. M. &Thompson, D. J. — 1995. Persistence of a parasitoid-host system: refuges and generation cycles? —Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 260, 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, D. J. &van den Bosch, R. — 1972. Behavior and biology ofMonoctonus paulensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a prasite of dactynotine aphids. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 65, 773–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, J. C., Stamp, N. E. &Bowers, N. E. — 1987. Developmental change in aggregation, defense and escape behavior of buckmoth caterpillars,Hemileuca lucina (Saturniidae). —Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 20, 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, P. D. & Bell, C. H. — 1991. Biology and ecology of moth pests of stored foods. In: Ecology and management of food industry pests (J. R. Gorham, ed.). —FDA Technical Bulletin, Virginia, 181–193.

  • Dial, C. I. &Adler, P. H. — 1985. Larval behavior and cannibalism inHeliothis zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 83, 258–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doutt, R. L. — 1964. Biological characteristics of entomophagous adults. In: Biological control of insect pests and weeds (P. DeBach, ed.). —Reinhold, N. Y., 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. C. — 1959. Life history and ecology ofHorogenes chrysostictos Gmelin (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) a parasite ofEphestia sericarium (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). —Can. J. Zool., 37, 429–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, S. E. — 1950. Regulation of ovulation and egg disposal in the parasitic Hymenoptera. —Can. Entomol., 82, 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, L. R. — 1975. Cannibalism in natural populations. —Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 6, 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. M., Ward, S. A. &Dixon, A. F. G. — 1984. Limitation of superparasitism byAphidius rhopalosiphi, a consequence of aphid defensive behaviour. —Ecol. Entomol., 9, 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, I. D. — 1988. Evolutionary patterns of host utilization by ichneumonoid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae and Braconidae). —Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 57, 137–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerling, D., Roitberg, B. D. &Mackauer, M. — 1990. Instar-specific defense of the pea aphid,Acrythosiphon pisum: Influence on oviposition success of the parasiteAphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). —J. Insect Behav., 3, 501–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glen, D. M. — 1977. Ecology of the parasites of a predatory bug,Blepharidopterus angulatus (Fall). —Ecol. Entomol., 2, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray, H. C. J. — 1994. Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. —Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, P. — 1993. Insect behavioral and morphological defenses against parasitoids. —Ann. Rev. Entomol., 38, 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, P. &Price, P. W. — 1988. Plant influences on parasitism of two leaf-miners: a test of enemy-free space. —Ecology, 69, 1506–1516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. A., Harvey, I. F. &Thompson, D. J. — 1994. Flexible larval growth allows use of a range of host sizes by a parasitoid wasp. —Ecology, 75, 1420–1428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. A. &Thompson, D. J. — 1995. Developmental interactions between the solitary endoparasitoidVenturia canescens and two of its hosts,Plodia interpunctella andCorcyra cephalonica. —Eur. J. Entomol., 92, 427–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrebout, W. M. — 1969. Some aspects of host selection inEucarcelia rutilla Vill (Diptera: Tachinidae). —Neth. J. Zool., 19, 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, K. R. — 1986. Preference, acceptance, and fitness components ofMicroplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) attacking various instars ofHeliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). —Environ. Entomol., 15, 274–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, M. A. &Kidd, N. A. C. — 1986. Host-feeding strategies in hymenopteran parasitoids. —Biol. Rev., 61, 395–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, M. A. &Kidd, N. A. C. — 1995. Insect Natural Enemies: practical approaches to their study and evaluation. —Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouame, K. L. &Mackauer, M. — 1991. Influence of aphid size, age, and behaviour on host choice by the parasitoid waspEphedrus californicus: a test of host-size models. —Oecologia, 80, 197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loan, C. C. — 1964. Observation on the biology ofCentistes excrucians (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). —Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ont., 94, 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer, M. &Sequeira, R. — 1993. Patterns of development in insects parasites. In: Parasites and Pathogens of Insects Volume 1 (N. E. Beckage, S. N. Thompson &B. A. Frederici, eds.). —Academic Press, New York, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, C. W. &Browning, H. W. — 1985. Life history and reproductive biology ofAllorhogas pyralophagus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasite improted for release againstEoreuma loftini (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). —ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 79, 402–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, T. F. — 1983. The effect of plants on the host relations of a specialist parasitoid ofHeliothis larvae. —Entomol. Exp. Appl., 34, 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, J. V. &DeLoach, C. J. — 1972. Some aspects of host selection byPerilitus coccinellae. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 65, 834–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. J. — 1972. The ichneumon waspVenturia canescens: oviposition and avoidance of superparasitism. —Entomol. Exp. Appl., 15, 190–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotheray, G. E. — 1981. Host searching and oviposition behaviour of some parasitoids of aphidophagous syrphid larvae. —Ecol. Entomol., 6, 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G. — 1975. The fate of an internal parasitoid,Nemeritis canescens, in a variety of insects. —Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond., 127, 141–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. T. — 1974. Host acceptance behaviour ofCampoletis sonorensis towardHeliothis zea. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 67, 835–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slansky, F. Jr. — 1986. Nutritional ecology of endoparasitic insects and their hosts: an overview. —J. Insect Physiol., 32, 255–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smilowitz, Z. &Iwantsch, G. F. — 1975. Relationship between the parasitoidHyposoter exiguae and the cabbage looper,Tricholupsia ni: the effect of host age on ovipositional rate of the parasitoid and successful parasitism. —Can. Entomol., 107, 689–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagi, M. — 1986. The reproductive strategy of the gregarious parasitoid,Pteromalus puparum (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). 2. Host size discrimination and regulation of the number and sex ratio of progeny in a single host. —Oecologia, 70, 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. D. — 1988. Host effects on functional and ovipositional responses ofBracon hebetor. —J. Anim. Ecol., 57, 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Alphen, J. J. M. &Vet, L. E. M. — 1986. An evolutionary approach to host finding and host selection. In: Insect Parasitoids (J. K. Waage &D. Greathead, eds). —Academic Press, London, 23–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vet, L. E. M. &van Alphen, J. J. M. — 1985. A comparative functional approach to the host detection behaviour of parasitic wasps. I. A qualitative study on Eucoilidae and Alysiinae. —Oikos, 44, 478–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S. B. — 1976. Host selection by insect parasitoids. —Ann. Rev. Entomol., 21, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S. B. — 1985. The behavior of parasitoids. In: Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Volume 9 (G. A. Kerkut &L. I. Gilbert, eds). —Pergamon, New York, 417–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S. B. &Iwantsch, G. F. — 1980. Host suitability for insect parasitoids. —Ann. Rev. Entomol., 25, 397–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waage, J. K. — 1978. Arrestment responses of the parasitoid,Nemeritis canescens, to a contact chemical produced by its host. —Physiol. Entomol., 3, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waloff, N. — 1967. Biology of three species ofLeiophron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Euphorinae) parasitic on Miridae on broom. —Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond., 118, 187–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weseloh, R. M. — 1974. Host recognition by the gypsy moth larval parasitoid,Apanteles melanoscelus. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 67, 585–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. R. — 1951. The factors which promote and influence the oviposition ofNemeritis canescens Gravs. —Proc. Roy. Entomol. Soc. Lond. Ser. A., 26, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeargan, K. V. &Braman, S. K. — 1986. Life history of the parasiteDiolcogaster facetosa (Weed) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its behavioral adaptation to the defensive response of a lepidopteran host. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 79, 1029–1033.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeargan, K. V. &Braman, S. K. — 1989. Life history of the hyperparasitoidMesochorus discitergus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) and tactics used to overcome the defensive behavior of the green cloverworn (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 82, 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harvey, J.A., Thompson, D.J. Host behaviour and its influence on foraging and acceptance by the solitary parasitoid wasp,Venturia canescens (Hym: Ichneumonidae) . Entomophaga 40, 193–210 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373068

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373068

Key-Words

Navigation