Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid tests for esculin hydrolysis by anaerobic bacteria

  • Laboratory Methods
  • Published:
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Esculin hydrolysis is one of the biochemical tests used in the identification of anaerobic microorganisms. The conventional method by use of growing microbial cells requires 24–48 hours of incubation. On the other hand, growth independent methods like the buffered esculin test, the spot test, and the PathoTec strip test utilize the presence of constitutive enzymes and, therefore, yield results in 1–4 hours. A total of 817 anaerobic organisms were used in this study to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the three rapid methods. All three rapid methods gave excellent correlation with the standard conventional method. Over 99% of the organisms gave comparable results with the spot test and the buffered esculin test within one hour; the PathoTec strip test required up to 4 hours. The former two were not only more rapid but also more economical than the PathoTec strip test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Deibel, R. H. andSeeley, H. W. Jr. 1974. Streptococcaceae. p. 490–509.In R. E. Buchanan and N. E. Gibbons (eds), Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. -The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, V. R. andHawkins, T. M. 1974. Laboratory methods in anaerobic bacteriology. -Center for Disease Control. Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edberg, S. C., Gam, K., Bottenbley, C. J. andSinger, J. M. 1976. Rapid spot test for the determination of esculin hydrolysis. -J. Clin. Microbiol.4: 180–184.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edberg, S. C., Pittman, S. andSinger, J. M. 1977. Esculin hydrolysis by Enterobacteriaceae. -J. Clin. Microbiol.6: 111–116.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Facklam, R. 1973. Comparison of several laboratory media for presumptive identification of enterococci and group D streptococci. -Appl. Microbiol.26: 138–145.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Facklam, R., andMoody, M. 1970. Presumptive identification of group D streptococci: The bile-esculin test. -Appl. Microbiol.20: 245–250.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M. L. andKillinger, A. H. 1966.Listeria monocytogenes and listeric infections. -Bacteriol. Rev.30: 309–382.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, H. D., Goldberg, D. andSampson, J. 1970. Laboratory studies with a selective enterococcus medium. -Appl. Microbiol.20: 433–436.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qadri, S. M. H., Desilva, M. I. andZubairi, S. 1980. Rapid test for determination of esculin hydrolysis. -J. Clin. Microbiol.12: 472–474.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qadri, S. M. H., Johnson, S., Smith, J. C., Zubairi, S. andGillum, R. L. 1981. Comparison of spot esculin hydrolysis with the PathoTec strip test for rapid differentiation of anaerobic bacteria. — J. Clin. Microbiol.13: (in press).

  • Smith, P. B., Rhoden, D. L. andTomforhrde, K. M. 1975. Evaluation of the PathoTec Rapid I-D System for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. -J. Clin. Microbiol.1: 359–362.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, R. H. andLevine M. 1942. Differentiation of the “intermediate” coli-like bacteria. -J. Bacteriol.44: 487–505.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Husain Qadri, S.M., Johnson, S. Rapid tests for esculin hydrolysis by anaerobic bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 47, 371–379 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350787

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350787

Keywords

Navigation